#MeToo Human rights victim! To President Trump 2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1,

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!

To President Trump

2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists
on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1,
criminal law 60" against "support" of Immigration Act 22-4-4 as "reason for crime".
However, "offense" applies "Article 62 (1) of the Penal Code,
Criminal Code 60" to the Immigration Act 70 "Extracurricular Activities".
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
This is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law! Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?

Dear sirs. "Kin Gungaku" who was considered "accomplice" was the same "punishment" as I was,
but because he admitted his sin,
he became "suspended execution" instead of "punishment for actual labor".
He was "forcibly repatriated" to China at the end of October 2010.
Four Chinese had become "sentence of labor one and a half" and "fine for punishment"
by around August 2010.
They are "deported" to China in "suspended execution".
In case
I and 4 Chinese people and Chinese Kin Gungaku are not protected
by the Constitution of Japan.

Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan (Equality under the Law) Paragraph 1.
"All citizens are equal under the law and are not discriminated against in political,
economic or social relations by race, creed, gender, social status or entrance."

Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan.
"No one shall be deprived of its life
or liberty unless it is in accordance with the procedures prescribed by law,
and no other punishment can be imposed."
"Procedure prescribed by law" refers to the law legislated in the Diet.

It is clearly contrary to "International Covenant
on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan. It is the following article.
Article 2 (1) (3), Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13,
Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17, Article
Article 26,

We have not committed any crime.
This is "False charges".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
Because the Japanese government will not accept it,
"condemnation" of the international community is necessary.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on next week.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano

My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Thank you freedom and democracy【Reply by e-mail from President Trump 2019-01-17】Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.

【Reply by e-mail from President 　Trump 2019-01-17】

January 16, 2019

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/POTD-November-29-2018-1.jpg

● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a 　#MeToo victim 　too.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

#MeToo Human rights victim!Dr. Lee Young-ho, Foreign Minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea 2019-01-17: Prosecutors impersonate the applicable law on the grounds of immigration law 22-4-4 "If you obtain false documents by obtaining fal

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency

Dear sirs. Please "forward" this e-mail to Foreign Minister Lee Yong-Ho.
This mail is sending every day to the world media,
the embassies of various countries, the White House, etc.

Dr. Lee Young-ho, Foreign Minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

2019-01-17: Prosecutors impersonate the applicable law
on the grounds of immigration law 22-4-4 "If you obtain false documents
by obtaining false documents, you will cancel this status of residence".
I will apply "Criminal law Article 62 (1), criminal law 60" to "support" of immigration law 22-4-4.
However, "Penal Code Article 62 (1),
Penal Code 60" can not be applied to administrative punishment "withdrawal of status of residence".
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
It is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law!
Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?

Dear sirs. Even after graduating from college,
the four Chinese who failed to get a job at L company continued working
at a restaurant that worked part-time in school days.
So they were arrested in May to June 2010,
"Illegal employment due to activities outside the status of residence",
Article 70-4 of the Immigration Act.

However,
employers of eating and drinking establishments hiring Chinese people are not arrested
under Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73 (a crime that promotes illegal labor).
Employers have not received any disposition.
In case
Looking at "record of interrogation",
employers who hired Chinese people "stated" they neglected to confirm
that the Chinese were "qualified to work".

I and "Kin Gungaku" which is "the Chinese who took charge
of" Chinese recruitment "do not do the act prescribed in" Immigration law 73-2 clause ".

But the prosecutor says like this.
We offered "Contract documents for false content of employment" to "Chinese who will be recruited".
Therefore, the Chinese easily obtained "qualification of stay" of "technology"
or "humanities international".
The Chinese were able to live in Japan because "staying resident qualification" was obtained.
Because the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to do "illegal labor".

Therefore, "causal relationship" between 'act of providing contract document
of false content of employment' and 'illegal work' is obvious.
Therefore, in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
"Article 60 of the Criminal Code," Crime of Assistance "
of Article 62 of the Criminal Code was applied due to the Immigration Act 22-4-4.
We were arrested in June 2010 and charged in July.

In April 2011, I received a ruling from the Tokyo District Court for "one
and a half years of labor and a fine of 1 million yen".
I appealed to the High Court but was rejected in October 2011.
Although I appealed to the Supreme Court,
"Appeal due to misappropriation of application law is not subject to deliberation pursuant
to the provisions of the" Code of Criminal Procedure "was rejected in February 2012.
And I was imprisoned in Tokyo detention center in March 2012.
And in April 2012 I was imprisoned in a prison in Tochigi prefecture.
And, in March 2013, I was "released" after "the sentence of labor" ended.

I lost all my wealth and credit.
The battle for recovery of my honor and reparation began.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes
of criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano

Request to His Excellency Lee Young Ho ***************************************** *

Please request from the Pyongyang government to the Japanese government.
"The Japanese government should" resolve "the incident of abduction of foreigners" incident.
There are many "victims" of "Koreans" who are "the same ethnic group".
On behalf of "people of Korea" please protest the Japanese government!

I also send the contents of the same to President Donald Trump of the White House.
President Donald Trump sometimes has encouragement reply.
For example, it is a reply like the following. The contents are different every time.

The White House, Washington
November 16, 2018
  In case

There is no greater honor than serving as President of the United States. I especially enjoy hearing from the American people, and I appreciate you emailing your thoughts and suggestions.

"Babe" Ruth, Jr., Elvis Presley, Alan Page, Senator Orrin (Raber Staubach, Justice Antonin Scalia, George Herman) Hatch, and Miriam Adelson. Each of these extraordinary individuals has made an indelible mark on American history through their outstanding achievements and endeavors.

I encourage you to watch today's ceremony honoring these outstanding Americans.

My staff is closely reviewing your correspondence to ensure that your views, questions, questions, questions, questions, and concerns are addressed.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump

The White House, Washington
October 28, 2018
  In case

Thank you for your email. My staff is closely reviewing your correspondence to ensure your views, questions, questions, questions, questions, and concerns are addressed.

As my administration continues to fight the drug and opioid crisis on all fronts, I encourage Americans to participate in National Prescription Drug Take Back Day Saturday, October 27, 2018. Take Back Day is in an opportunity for individuals to safely dispose of expired or unused prescription drugs at one of any of the thousands of drop-off sites.

Ninety percent of these accidental fatalities are due to drug overdose, and the majority of drug poisoning deaths are opioid-related -A problem that most frequently originates inside the family medicine cabinet.

During a hands of prescription drugs for disposal at more than 5,800 collection sites: sufficient pills to fill three Boeing 757 airplanes. We must continue to ensure that these drugs do not end up in the hands of our most vulnerable.

Together, we will defeat this epidemic as one people, one family, and one magnificent Nation under God.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump

From the staff of the White House, I receive a reply every day

November 19, 2018

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.

President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.

Sincerely,

The Office of Presidential Correspondence

I am waiting for a reply from the North Korean government.

My information *********************************************** ****

Yasuhiro Nagano

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

#MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme! À Emmanuel · Président français Macron 2019-01-17: Le procureur est la loi sur l'immigration 22-4-4 Nous falsifierons la loi applicable pour le motif "Soumettre un faux document et obtenir le statut de résidence a

<Courrier public> #MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme!

À Emmanuel · Président français Macron

2019-01-17: Le procureur est la loi sur l'immigration 22-4-4
Nous falsifierons la loi applicable pour le motif "Soumettre un faux document et obtenir le statut de résidence annulera ce statut de résidence".
Je vais appliquer "l'article 62 (1) du droit pénal, l'article 60 du code pénal" au "soutien" de la loi sur l'immigration 22-4-4.
Toutefois, les "articles 62.1 du Code pénal, Code pénal 60" ne peuvent pas être appliqués aux sanctions administratives "retrait du statut de résident".
C'est "topsy-turvy" "confus". C'est de la comédie.
Tous ceux qui comprennent la loi! Veuillez enseigner au gouvernement japonais "la logique du droit".
Combien de temps le gouvernement japonais poursuivra-t-il cette "comédie"?

Chers Messieurs. Quatre Chinois qui n’ont pas trouvé de travail dans l’entreprise L, même après avoir obtenu leur diplôme universitaire,
J'ai continué à travailler dans un restaurant où je travaillais à temps partiel pendant mes années d'école.
Donc, ils seront en mai - juin 2010,
Il a été arrêté en vertu de "l'article 70-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration (emploi illégal pour des activités autres que le statut de résident)".

Cependant, les employeurs de restaurants qui employaient des Chinois
Il n’est pas arrêté en vertu de l’article 2 de la loi sur l’immigration 73 (crime favorisant le travail illégal)].
Les employeurs n'ont reçu aucune disposition.

En regardant "enregistrement de l'interrogatoire", les employeurs qui ont embauché les Chinois,
Il a déclaré avoir omis de confirmer que les Chinois étaient "qualifiés pour travailler".

Moi et "Kin Gungaku" qui est "le Chinois qui était responsable du" recrutement chinois "
Je n'ai pas accompli l'acte prescrit à l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Mais le procureur dit comme ça.
Nous avons offert "Documents contractuels pour faux contenu d'emploi" aux "Chinois qui seront recrutés".
Par conséquent, les Chinois ont facilement obtenu la "qualification de séjour" de "technologie" ou "d'humanités internationales".
Les Chinois ont pu vivre au Japon grâce à l'obtention de la "qualification de résident permanent".
Parce que les Chinois ont pu vivre au Japon, ils ont pu faire du "travail illégal".

Par conséquent, le "lien de causalité" entre "acte de fourniture d'un document contractuel contenant un faux contenu d'emploi" et "travail illégal" est évident.
Par conséquent, en violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration, l'article 60 du code pénal intitulé "Crime d'assistance" de l'article 62 du code pénal a été appliqué en raison de la loi sur l'immigration 22-4-4.
Nous avons été arrêtés en juin 2010 et inculpés en juillet.

En avril 2011, j'ai reçu une décision du tribunal de district de Tokyo pour "un an et demi de travail et une amende d'un million de yen".
J'ai interjeté appel devant la Haute Cour, mais j'ai été rejeté en octobre 2011.
J'ai interjeté appel devant la Cour suprême, mais "les appels en raison d'erreurs dans les lois appliquées ne sont pas sujets à délibération conformément aux dispositions du Code de procédure pénale"
Il a été rejeté en février 2012.
Et j'ai été emprisonné au centre de détention de Tokyo en mars 2012.
Et en avril 2012, j'ai été emprisonné dans une prison de la préfecture de Tochigi.
Et, en mars 2013, j'ai été "relâché" après la fin de "la peine de travail".

J'ai perdu toute ma richesse et mon crédit.
La bataille pour la récupération de mon honneur et de la réparation a commencé.

Même cela, vous ne pouvez pas comprendre?
Ou avez-vous pas de justice?

Je continuerai demain.
Je vais continuer jusqu'à ce que vous compreniez.

Je "fais appel" des deux choses.

C'est une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme par le gouvernement japonais.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et compensation" soit effectué.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais un étranger est innocent.

L'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration "Péchés du travail illégal" était puni par les étrangers.
D'autre part, la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration utilise des employeurs qui sont des "relations de cause à effet" de travail illégal au sens de la Loi sur l'immigration 73-2
(Un crime qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, le pouvoir judiciaire japonais ne "jette" que des étrangers, mais il ne dispose pas des employeurs.
Cela viole évidemment le "principe d'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international interdisant l’élimination consciente des étrangers.

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement un étranger est innocent, un étranger qui a travaillé illégalement est innocent.
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe personne «qui ait soutenu d’autres crimes de droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate dans le pays philippin, membre du personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La "cause du crime" à laquelle l'accusation applique "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" est la suivante.
Les étrangers ont commis l'acte prévu à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration (acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" contre cela.
La décision est "annulation du statut de résidence" du "ministre de la Justice" et "retrait forcé à l'étranger".
Par conséquent, "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" ne peut pas être appliqué.

Le gouvernement japonais "écrase" les plaintes.
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir de l'Etat, c'est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Le matériel est en dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
S'il vous plaît "sauver" beaucoup de "victimes" avec "courage et justice".
Je demande au gouvernement japonais de "récupérer son honneur" et de "dédommager la victime" de la victime.

Cordialement, Yasuhiro Nagano

Il est ouvert au programme ci-dessous.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer! Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten 2019-01-17: Staatsanwaltschaft ist Einwanderungsgesetz 22-4-4 Wir werden das geltende Recht aus dem Grund fälschen, dass "ein falsches Dokument eingereicht wird und der Status

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer!

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten

2019-01-17: Staatsanwaltschaft ist Einwanderungsgesetz 22-4-4
Wir werden das geltende Recht aus dem Grund fälschen, dass "ein falsches Dokument eingereicht wird und der Status des Wohnsitzes diesen Status des Aufenthalts annulliert".
Ich werde "Strafrecht Artikel 62 Absatz 1, Strafrecht 60" auf "Unterstützung" des Einwanderungsgesetzes 22-4-4 anwenden.
"Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 62 Absatz 1, Strafgesetzbuch 60" kann jedoch nicht auf die Verwaltungsstrafe angewandt werden, nämlich "Rückzug des Aufenthaltsstatus".
Dies ist "verrückt" "verwirrt". Es ist eine Komödie.
Jeder, der das Gesetz verstehen kann, lehre die japanische Regierung "Logik des Gesetzes".
Wie lange wird die japanische Regierung diese "Komödie" fortsetzen?

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Vier Chinesen, die trotz ihres Universitätsabschlusses keinen Job bei der Firma L bekommen haben,
Ich arbeitete weiter in einem Restaurant, das ich während meiner Schulzeit nebenberuflich arbeitete.
So werden sie im Mai - Juni 2010 sein,
Er wurde auf der Grundlage von "Artikel 70-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes (illegale Beschäftigung aufgrund anderer Tätigkeiten als des Aufenthaltsstatus)" verhaftet.

Allerdings Arbeitgeber von Restaurants, die Chinesen beschäftigten
Es wird nicht gemäß Artikel 2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes 73 (ein Verbrechen, das illegale Arbeitskraft fördert) festgenommen.]
Die Arbeitgeber haben keine Verfügung erhalten.

Mit Blick auf "Aufzeichnungen der Befragung" haben Arbeitgeber, die die Chinesen eingestellt haben,
Er erklärte, er habe es versäumt zu bestätigen, dass die Chinesen "qualifiziert sind, um zu arbeiten".

Ich und "Kin Gungaku", dh "der Chinese, der für die" chinesische Rekrutierung "verantwortlich war
Ich habe die in Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes vorgeschriebene Tat nicht getan.

Aber der Staatsanwalt sagt so.
Wir haben den "Chinesen, die rekrutiert werden" "Vertragsdokumente für falsche Beschäftigungsinhalte" angeboten.
Daher erlangten die Chinesen leicht die "Aufenthaltsqualifikation" von "Technologie" oder "Geisteswissenschaften international".
Die Chinesen konnten in Japan leben, weil sie die "Qualifizierung als Aufenthaltsberechtigter" erhalten hatten.
Weil die Chinesen in Japan leben konnten, konnten sie "illegale Arbeit" verrichten.

Daher ist ein "Kausalzusammenhang" zwischen "Vertragsbeleg über falschen Arbeitsinhalt" und "illegaler Arbeit" offensichtlich.
Daher wurde unter Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Artikel 60 des Strafgesetzbuchs" Verbrechen der Unterstützung "des Artikels 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs aufgrund des Einwanderungsgesetzes 22-4-4 angewandt.
Wir wurden im Juni 2010 verhaftet und im Juli angeklagt.

Im April 2011 erhielt ich vom Bezirksgericht Tokio ein Urteil wegen "eineinhalb Jahren Arbeit und einer Geldstrafe von 1 Million Yen".
Ich habe beim High Court Berufung eingelegt, wurde aber im Oktober 2011 abgelehnt.
Ich habe beim Obersten Gerichtshof Berufung eingelegt, aber "Einsprüche wegen fehlerhafter Gesetze unterliegen keiner Beratung gemäß den Bestimmungen der Strafprozessordnung."
Es wurde im Februar 2012 abgelehnt.
Ich war im März 2012 in der Strafanstalt von Tokio inhaftiert.
Im April 2012 war ich in einem Gefängnis in der Präfektur Tochigi inhaftiert.
Und im März 2013 wurde ich "entlassen", nachdem "die Arbeitsstrafe" endete.

Ich habe mein gesamtes Vermögen und meine Anerkennung verloren.
Der Kampf um die Wiedererlangung meiner Ehre und Wiedergutmachung begann.

Auch das kannst du nicht verstehen?
Oder hast du keine Gerechtigkeit?

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.
Ich werde weitermachen, bis du verstanden hast.

Ich "appelliere" an die beiden Dinge.

Es ist eine "internationale" Verletzung der Menschenrechte durch die japanische Regierung.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Ehreerhebung und Entschädigung" erfolgt.

1. Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsgenehmigung" durch. Aber ein Ausländer ist unschuldig.

Nur Ausländer wurden durch Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden illegaler Arbeit" bestraft.
Auf der anderen Seite verwendet das Immigration Control Act Arbeitgeber, die "Ursache-Wirkungs-Beziehungen" illegaler Arbeit im Rahmen des Immigration Act 73-2 sind
(Ein Verbrechen, das illegale Beschäftigung förderte).

Die japanische Justiz "entsorgt" jedoch nur Ausländer, verfügt jedoch nicht über Arbeitgeber.
Dies verstößt offensichtlich gegen den "Grundsatz der Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal beschäftigt hat, unschuldig ist, ist ein Ausländer, der illegal gearbeitet hat, unschuldig.
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, "der andere strafrechtliche Verbrechen unterstützt hat" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat im philippinischen Land, ein Mitarbeiter der philippinischen Botschaft" ist unschuldig.

2 Der "Grund für ein Verbrechen", auf das die Staatsanwaltschaft Anwendung findet "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" lautet wie folgt.
Ausländer führten die in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes vorgeschriebene Tat durch (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente).
Dagegen gibt es keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Disposition ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" durch "Justizminister" und "obligatorischer Rückzug ins Ausland".
Daher kann "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" nicht angewandt werden.

Die japanische Regierung "zermalmt" Beschwerden.
"Zerquetschen" durch Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Das Material ist unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Bitte "retten" Sie viele "Opfer" mit "Mut und Gerechtigkeit".
Ich fordere die japanische Regierung auf, "die Ehre zurückzugewinnen" und "das Opfer zu entschädigen".

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Yasuhiro Nagano

Meine Informationen ***************

Es ist offen für das Programm unten.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

(Yasuhiro Nagano)

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

#MeToo Human rights victim! To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-01-17: Prosecutors impersonate the applicable law on the grounds of immigration law 22-4-4 "If you obtain false documents by obtaining false documents, you will cancel this stat

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister

2019-01-17: Prosecutors impersonate the applicable law
on the grounds of immigration law 22-4-4 "If you obtain false documents
by obtaining false documents, you will cancel this status of residence".
I will apply "Criminal law Article 62 (1), criminal law 60" to "support" of immigration law 22-4-4.
However, "Penal Code Article 62 (1),
Penal Code 60" can not be applied to administrative punishment "withdrawal of status of residence".
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
It is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law!
Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?

Dear sirs. Even after graduating from college,
the four Chinese who failed to get a job at L company continued working
at a restaurant that worked part-time in school days.
So they were arrested in May to June 2010,
"Illegal employment due to activities outside the status of residence",
Article 70-4 of the Immigration Act.

However,
employers of eating and drinking establishments hiring Chinese people are not arrested
under Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73 (a crime that promotes illegal labor).
Employers have not received any disposition.
In case
Looking at "record of interrogation",
employers who hired Chinese people "stated" they neglected to confirm
that the Chinese were "qualified to work".

I and "Kin Gungaku" which is "the Chinese who took charge
of" Chinese recruitment "do not do the act prescribed in" Immigration law 73-2 clause ".

But the prosecutor says like this.
We offered "Contract documents for false content of employment" to "Chinese who will be recruited".
Therefore, the Chinese easily obtained "qualification of stay" of "technology"
or "humanities international".
The Chinese were able to live in Japan because "staying resident qualification" was obtained.
Because the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to do "illegal labor".

Therefore, "causal relationship" between 'act of providing contract document
of false content of employment' and 'illegal work' is obvious.
Therefore, in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
"Article 60 of the Criminal Code," Crime of Assistance "
of Article 62 of the Criminal Code was applied due to the Immigration Act 22-4-4.
We were arrested in June 2010 and charged in July.

In April 2011, I received a ruling from the Tokyo District Court for "one
and a half years of labor and a fine of 1 million yen".
I appealed to the High Court but was rejected in October 2011.
Although I appealed to the Supreme Court,
"Appeal due to misappropriation of application law is not subject to deliberation pursuant
to the provisions of the" Code of Criminal Procedure "was rejected in February 2012.
And I was imprisoned in Tokyo detention center in March 2012.
And in April 2012 I was imprisoned in a prison in Tochigi prefecture.
And, in March 2013, I was "released" after "the sentence of labor" ended.

I lost all my wealth and credit.
The battle for recovery of my honor and reparation began.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes
of criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano

It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump 2019-01-17: Prosecutors impersonate the applicable law on the grounds of immigration law 22-4-4 "If you obtain false documents by obtaining false documents, you will cancel this status of residence". I will apply "Criminal law Arti

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!

To President Trump

2019-01-17: Prosecutors impersonate the applicable law
on the grounds of immigration law 22-4-4 "If you obtain false documents
by obtaining false documents, you will cancel this status of residence".
I will apply "Criminal law Article 62 (1), criminal law 60" to "support" of immigration law 22-4-4.
However, "Penal Code Article 62 (1),
Penal Code 60" can not be applied to administrative punishment "withdrawal of status of residence".
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
It is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law!
Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?

Dear sirs. Even after graduating from college,
the four Chinese who failed to get a job at L company continued working
at a restaurant that worked part-time in school days.
So they were arrested in May to June 2010,
"Illegal employment due to activities outside the status of residence",
Article 70-4 of the Immigration Act.

However,
employers of eating and drinking establishments hiring Chinese people are not arrested
under Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73 (a crime that promotes illegal labor).
Employers have not received any disposition.
In case
Looking at "record of interrogation",
employers who hired Chinese people "stated" they neglected to confirm
that the Chinese were "qualified to work".

I and "Kin Gungaku" which is "the Chinese who took charge
of" Chinese recruitment "do not do the act prescribed in" Immigration law 73-2 clause ".

But the prosecutor says like this.
We offered "Contract documents for false content of employment" to "Chinese who will be recruited".
Therefore, the Chinese easily obtained "qualification of stay" of "technology"
or "humanities international".
The Chinese were able to live in Japan because "staying resident qualification" was obtained.
Because the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to do "illegal labor".

Therefore, "causal relationship" between 'act of providing contract document
of false content of employment' and 'illegal work' is obvious.
Therefore, in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
"Article 60 of the Criminal Code," Crime of Assistance "
of Article 62 of the Criminal Code was applied due to the Immigration Act 22-4-4.
We were arrested in June 2010 and charged in July.

In April 2011, I received a ruling from the Tokyo District Court for "one
and a half years of labor and a fine of 1 million yen".
I appealed to the High Court but was rejected in October 2011.
Although I appealed to the Supreme Court,
"Appeal due to misappropriation of application law is not subject to deliberation pursuant
to the provisions of the" Code of Criminal Procedure "was rejected in February 2012.
And I was imprisoned in Tokyo detention center in March 2012.
And in April 2012 I was imprisoned in a prison in Tochigi prefecture.
And, in March 2013, I was "released" after "the sentence of labor" ended.

I lost all my wealth and credit.
The battle for recovery of my honor and reparation began.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes
of criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano

My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************