Before reading this document,
Please read "1. Summary of petition".
2. Petition Fact
Explain the facts and circumstances of illegal activities in chronological order and explain.
We will explain all matters related to the evaluation and examination of a specific case.
I will explain the facts and circumstances by considering "criminal offenses on the way" (how we infringe our human rights).
．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．
2-1. History of incident occurrence
I (Nagano), the president of Ｌ Co., Ltd., announced the planned adoption (informalization) by around January 2009 against four Chinese (former offender) who are scheduled to be employed at regular subscription (April 2009) .
However, due to the December 2008 Lehman shock, due to the sharp decline in the schedule of orders, in March 2009 we canceled the planned adoption (informal).
Chinese people planning to adopt have already renewed their status of residence.
Previously, since the Immigration Bureau has not granted the status of residence to the company to be employed, it is issued to individuals in foreign countries, so even if cancellation is made, the status of residence already issued You can not cancel your qualification. Also, if a foreign national who got the status of residence is within the scope of the status of residence, he was told that he / she is free to work at any company.
Even after graduating from university, four Chinese (former offenders) who could not get a job at Lefko Company continue to work at a restaurant that worked part-time in the age of students and continue working from May 2010 to June 2010, Immigration Control Act 70 He was arrested in Article 4 (illegal work due to activities outside the status of residence).
However, business operators of eating and drinking establishments hiring a former offender are not arrested by Article 2 (illegal employment promotion crime) prescribed by the Immigration Act and have not received any disposition.
Looking at the interrogation record, the employers who hired stated that they were negligent in confirming that the four Chinese people are qualified to work.
Although I and the Chinese who was in charge of recruitment, former subordinate, Kin Gungaku (Gold Military University), despite not carrying out the act prescribed in Article 2, Article 2,
Because it provided "False Employment Employment Statement" with no willingness to hire in the former offender who is going to be employed, the former offender could easily obtain the status of "technology" or "humanities international" status of residence.
I was able to live in Japan because I got my status of residence. Because I was able to live in Japan, I was able to work illegally in an offense.
Therefore, the criminal assistance crime as "Contents providing false employment contractor and illegal work is obvious" was applied, was arrested in June 2010 and was charged with the case in July .
I was sentenced in Tokyo District Court in April 2011 to imprisonment for a year and a half and a fine of 1 million yen for criminal punishment and appealed to the Tokyo High Court but was dismissed in October 2011 and the Supreme Court However, "Appeal due to application error mistake is not subject to deliberation under the Criminal Procedure Law" was rejected in February 2012.
In March 2012, he was imprisoned in the Tokyo Detention Center and in the following April he was imprisoned in a prison in Tochigi Prefecture, and he was sentenced in March 2013 with a sentence of sentence.
Kin Gungaku (Gold Military Academy), considered as an accomplice, was the same punishment as myself, but because he admitted his crime, he was not sentenced to imprisonment but was sentenced to suspension and was forcibly repatriated to China at the end of October 2010.
Four former offenders were sentenced to imprisonment for a year and a half for imprisonment by around August 2010, but they have been forcibly repatriated to China due to the suspension of execution.
In addition,
I and the four Chinese former offenders and the Chinese, Kin Gungaku (Golden Military University) who was considered as my complicity,
Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan (equality under the law) paragraph 1,
"All citizens are equal under the law, and by race, creed, gender, social status or entrance,
It is not discriminated in political, economic or social relations. ",
Then, Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution,
"No one is violating anything in the light of the fact that unless depended on the procedures prescribed by the law, no one can be deprived of its life or freedom or undertake any other punishment.
"Procedure prescribed by law" refers to the law legislated in the Diet.
The "International Covenant on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan
Article 2 (1) (3), Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13,
Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17, Article
It is clearly against Article 26,
It is a false charge without being accused of any sin.
In the Japanese judicial system, there is a "retrial request system", but due to the reason of "application error mistake" it can not be claimed. However, when a crime such as a police officer involved in the incident is confirmed, you can request a retrial.
Crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges is obvious. That sin,
Because it was arrested and captured though it did not become any crime, it is the criminal law "abuse of special officials' official abilities."
It is "criminal charges of false charges" of the criminal law because he accused us to impose punishment for false reasons, even though it did not become any crime. As a crime constitution reason, "willful" is not necessary.
So, the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office and the Metropolitan Police Department etc. submit as "a complaint letter" as to the person concerned with me, as "a letter of appeal" to the Chinese and the Filipino, but even if submitting many times, the crime is not clear I will not accept it.
Since Japan has given "prosecution monopoly right" to prosecutors, trial can not be made as a criminal case unless the prosecution accepts "indictment" or "indictment letter".
If the prosecution accepts "indictment" "accusation letter" and sets it "non-prosecution", there is a method of compulsory indictment by making a "request for examination" to the "prosecution review board" of the court,
Since the prosecution is not accepted, the last way of relief has also run out.
We also filed a "request for review" at the "Tokyo Prosecution Review Board" at the premise of dismissal,
Prosecutors have been dismissed for reasons that they are not prosecuted.
Litigation matters of 'special officials' abuse of the authority of official authority' and 'false accusation' are imminent. Please urgently respond to the International Criminal Court.
Because this case is a force majeure by the state by the exercise of power, I think that prescription is stopped.
2-2. The following is based on the complaint of I (Nagano) as an example,
In the criminal facts of police officers and prosecutors, we will state infringement of rights.
1. Police officials illegally abused their own authority around 11:30 on June 14, 2010, and I (Nagano) did not think any crime was a thing of any kind, even though he was not committing criminal acts , Contents The provision of a false employment contract to illegal workers who illegally worked was said to be a criminal offense, and at the Setagaya Department, I (Nagano) was charged with assisting the immigration criminal act (illegal employment due to activities outside the status of qualification) , I pretend to falsely charge the arrest warrant to Tokyo Simplified Court, I (Nagano) abuses the authority I have (Nagano) illegal warrant of content illegal, pressure on freedom of decision, I (Nagano) He undertook illegal arrest / detention and interrogation, and then moved to the Tsukishima station to conduct illegal arrest detention and interrogation. Therefore, the acts of police officers fall under Article 194 of the Criminal Code for abuse of the official authority of a special civil servant.
2. The police officers, illegally abusing the official authority they had about June 15, 2010, I (Nagano) thought that no criminal offense is being considered and he / she does not conduct criminal acts, I (Nagano) I want to obtain a plan to strictly imprisonment the illegally worked principal, which is different from usual countermeasures, to imprisonment with imprisonment with immigration regulations (activities outside the status of qualification), which is not contrary to international law, I have to punish a business operator who is an assistant of illegal employment, but since I do not want to punish because of passion, I planned to punish me (Nagano) as an alternate assistant and punish it with criminal law, content false Due to the allegation of assisting me (Nagano) who was arrested and arrested at Tsukishima Station for violating the Immigration Act (illegal employment due to activities outside the status of qualification), that providing the employment contract to the former offender who worked illegally was a crime, Contents to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office Falsehood with a false criminal name Is what the complaint (prosecutors). The acts of police officers fall under criminal law 172 false charges.
3. Prosecutors illegally abused their own authority around June 16, 2010, and I (Nagano) said that no criminal offense is being considered and despite not conducting criminal acts, false hiring The fact that the agreement was provided to the former offender who worked illegally is said to be suspected of being a criminal offense, suspected me (Nagano) under arrest / detention at the Tsukishima station, for allegedly assisting the immigration of the immigration law (illegal employment due to activities outside the status of qualification) I illegally obtain a detention request, illegally acquire a detention letter, abuse the authority, pressure the freedom of decision making with content ___ ___ ___ ___ 0 ___ ___ 0 ___ ___ 0 There was no illegal arrest detention and interrogation carried out. Therefore, the acts of the prosecutors fall under the criminal offense abuse of the special public officer's office of 194 criminal law.
4. A prosecutor requested the Tokyo District Court for a request for cancellation of detention around June 24, 2010 against a request for detention, but the prosecutor of I (Nagano) requested the opinion of the judge, I illegally abused the authority that I have, illegally issued a notice of cancellation, oppressed the freedom of decision making, I (Nagano) has no obligation, illegal arrest detention I did it. Therefore, the acts of the prosecutors fall under the criminal offense abuse of the special public officer's office of 194 criminal law.
5. Police officials illegally abused their own authority around July 3, 2010, and I (Nagano) no criminal offense is considered, ...
Naka, ... I (Nagano) abuses my authority and is an illegal arrest warrant of false content, squeezing the freedom of decision making, I (Nagano) has no obligation, illegal Arrested and captured, after that, transferred to Setagaya Department and Ogikubo station, illegal arrest detention was made and interrogated. Therefore, the acts of police officers fall under Article 194 of the Criminal Code for abuse of the official authority of a special civil servant.
6. The prosecutor of I (Nagano), illegally abusing the official authority which I have about July 3, 2010, I (Nagano) thought that no criminal offense is considered and no criminal act is done , · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Abusing the official authority and content illegal detention letter urges the freedom of decision making and I (Nagano) has no duty, illegal arrest detention and interrogation I did it. The acts of the prosecutors and the like fall under the criminal abuse of 194 special criminal officials criminal law.
7. The police officers, illegally abusing the official authority they had around July 4, 2010, I (Nagano) thought that no criminal offense is considered and despite the criminal act ... ..Office abbreviation
It is what the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office false charges (additional shipping) with a false criminal name. Therefore, the acts of police officers fall under criminal law 172 false charges.
8. Prosecutors illegally abused their own authority around July 24, 2010, I (Nagano) wants to get a hand in spite of no crime being considered or being a criminal act I (Nagano) planned to severely imprisonment the offense that illegally worked, unlike ordinary countermeasures, by imprisonment with the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of qualification), which aided the inviolation of the Immigration Act We must punish a business entity who is a person with illegal employment promotion crime, but since I do not want to punish because of passion, I planned to make me (Nagano) an imposter of an alternative and punish it with criminal law, content false employment contract As a crime, offering a book to a former offender who worked illegally worked, I (Nagano) who was arrested / captured by the Ogikubo station was fined for assisting the Immigration Act (illegal employment due to activities outside the status of qualification), and a false complaint was filed in the Tokyo District Court Prosecution). Therefore, the acts of public prosecutors fall under criminal law 172 false charges.
9. Prosecutors in charge of trials received handover from the prosecutor of interrogation, and from around late July 2010 until around June 24, 2011, I illegally abused the authority I have, I (Nagano) Despite no criminal being considered or acting as a criminal offense, it is a crime that providing a false employment contract to a former offender who used illegal work is a crime and I am imprisoned in the Tokyo detention center (Nagano ) Was not released as a defendant of aid for invasion of Immigration Act (illegal employment due to activities outside the status of qualification), and at the end of October of the same year, the court began a trial by reading illegal content false indictment in court, Oppressed, I (Nagano) has no duty, I tried to trial illegally arrested and captured.
And the counsel also requests a bail request monthly, but I (Nagano) gives the judge not to give bail to the judge every time, let me issue a notice of dismissal of illegal bail, I pressured freedom, and I (Nagano) did not have any obligation, I carried out a trial by making an illegal arrest and detention. Therefore, the acts of public prosecutors fall under criminal law 172 false charges.
2-3. "What crime does not come to mind and you are not committing criminal acts"
In response to "illegal employment" in Japan,
The foreign national who worked illegally was criminalized under Article 70 of "Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act (hereinafter referred to as" Immigration Act ")" illegal employment crime "
By criminalizing both companies equitably with Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73, "illegal employment promotion crime"
We are legislating not to violate the "Constitutional Under the Law" of the Constitution of Japan and the "International Law" (International Covenant on Citizenship and Political Rights) which prohibits the disposal of foreigners arbitrarily.
However, in reality, we do not dispose of (illegal workers) as "illegal employment promotion crime", but criminalize (illegal workers only) for criminal discrimination against illegal employment crime and make it expelled from abroad.
This is contrary to international law which prohibited foreign discrimination arbitrarily. It is contrary to equality under the law of the Constitution of Japan.
If you do not dispose of businesses with "illegal employment promotion crime" that illegally worked,
Foreign nationals who have been illegally worked are also disciplined (innocent) the law of law.
If so, of course, there is no one to help anyone to work illegally.
This is governance under the law, respect for fundamental human rights, compliance with international law.
In the case of the aid to violate the Immigration Control Act occurred in 2010, I did more criminal acts.
Do not dispose of businesses that illegally worked in the past as "illegal employment promotion crime"
Only foreigners who worked illegally were punished for "illegal working crimes" and were banished from the country,
We created a third party 's "assistant" in place of a business operator of "illegal employment promotion crime"
In order to make it appear as if it had been disposed of equally, we criminalized a third party and banished foreigners who were illegally employed as "imprisonment punishment" instead of being fined.
The third person is Kin Gungaku "Kin Military School", a former subordinate who was convicted with me (Nagano) who provided an employment contract to the former offender who will be hired.
Kin Gungaku "Kin Military Studies", which was deemed concomitant with me, is a special special provision that aims to comply with international law, aided by the aid acts against Chinese illegal employment, to assist aid work and promotion of illegal work Not a law "promoting illegal employment"
Illegally provided "False Employment Agreement" so that the status of residence was easily obtained. So I was in Japan. I was illegally working because I was in Japan. In a causal relationship with,
I was imprisoned with a penal servitude (imprisonment punishment) abused the "criminal sin" of the criminal law which is the general law.
In addition to us, not only of us but also, as far as I can tell, in 2014, the Embassy officials and diplomats of the Philippines have been subjected to criminal penalties under the same illegal logic of "assistance crime".
Since international law violations are taking place on a daily basis, please urgently respond.
So we will file a complaint against the UN High Commission office including this incident.
(Those related to myself have been filed as "complaint letters", those related to Chinese and Filipinos as "complaints" have been submitted but are not accepted.
My argument is that the application of "criminal penalty" of criminal law is a criminal act by violation of applicable law for the following reasons. The offense is a "criminal charges of false charges" of the criminal law, and it is "a crime of abuse of the special public officer's authority."
1. The aid for assisting illegal employment is stipulated in Article 2, Article 73 of the Immigration Act, "Special Law", "Crime of Promoting Illegal Employment."
I and KinGungaku (Gold Military Academy) do not do the act prescribed in "illegal employment promotion crime" so that regular offenses, police officers, prosecutors can also be accepted.
※ The "counsel" written in the indictment is a violation of the applicable law as it refers to the aid act against the cancellation of the status of residence, which is the administrative penalty described in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act .
No employer who hired a former offender has been disposed of as "illegal employment promotion crime" prescribed by Immigration Control Act without disposition.
-
If so, the former offenders who are hired and forced to work illegally are also equal under the law, without disposal. So it is not guilty.
-
If so, that there is no assistant to illegal employment, including me.
-
-
2. Next, it is said that the provision of "content false employment contract" made it easy to acquire the status of residence as a causal relation of the application of "criminal sin" of the criminal law, but it is illegal.
-
In addition,
-
Although it is said that they have acquired the status of residence easily, the conditions for granting status of residence are not stipulated by law, the conditions of granting are unpublished, they are given at discretion by the Minister of Justice and have made the status of residence easier I can not say.
-
-
Even if you get a status of residence under "Contents false employment contract", as stipulated in Article 4 4 of the Immigration Act 22 "Cancellation of Status of Residence", it is separate from illegal employment.
Even if you obtain the status of residence of international or technical skills from the Minister of Justice for "content false employment contract", if you work within the scope of the status of residence of international or technical skills or humanities, you will not become illegal (non-qualified) activities It is a trivial idea. Therefore, acquisition of status of residence and illegal work are not related at all.
Article 31 of the Constitution stipulates that "No person shall be deprived of its life or liberty unless it is made through the procedures prescribed by law, or can not impose any other punishment" (The provision of law refers to the law established in the Diet In addition to the ordinances established by local councils)
Submission of employment contracts is not required by law or ministerial ordinance, but is requested by foreigners for submission by section chief and cooperated as a business operator to be hired,
Even if it is false, there is no legal basis to impose criminal penalty on the case that the Minister of Justice gives at discretion. The only thing is that the Minister of Justice can cancel the "status of residence" as an administrative measure rather than a criminal disposition by the Immigration Control Act as a countermeasure against it.
The granting of status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice is not a law "ministerial ordinance" of the Ministry of Justice, and for technical and humanities international, it is stipulated as granting policy that you have specialized knowledge after graduating from university, junior college etc. As we can guess that "diploma" is a major factor of granting status of residence, it can not be said that employment contracts make it easier to obtain a status of residence.
I was in Japan because I got my status of residence. He said that he was able to work illegally because he was in Japan,
The status of residence is provided by the Minister of Justice at the discretion for undisclosed conditions.
Even after receiving the status of residence, furthermore the immigration permission (seal on the passport) is also unpublished permission conditions, allowing the foreign minister to reside (enter) by giving permission at the discretion. Therefore, even if the employment contract is false, it can not be said that it is easy to influence the discretionary authority of both Ministers.
In addition,
As a fact, since the Minister of Justice gives the status of residence at the discretion, I (Nagano) was explained and operated as follows on the status of residence, such as by questioning with immigration.
1) If the status of residence qualification is satisfied in "diploma" and expert knowledge is found, if employment company is inappropriate or employment contract is false etc, please let foreigners change employment contract company and reapply I am doing.
2) Foreign residents who have engaged in employment contracts will be granted a status of residence to foreign individuals even if they do not enter the company with their status of residence, and after granting, they will work anywhere within the scope of status of residence (skills and humanities) This is free.
3) After acquiring the status of residence, even if you can not join the employment contract company, you can find employment in the range of your status of residence and work within a certain period of time, rather than immediately rescission of your status of residence.
Therefore, it can not be said that the provision of "Contents false employment contract" made it easy to acquire the status of residence, and there is no causal relation between aid assistance for acquisition of status of residence and illegal employment.
As mentioned above, even if you obtain the status of residence of international and technical skills and humanities at discretion from the Minister of Justice in the "Contents false employment contract", if you work within the scope of the status of residence of technology and humanities international, you will not become illegal It is obvious that it is clear that there is no relationship between "content false employment contract" and illegal employment.
It is self-evident that they became illegal workers being the responsibility of employers who employed and worked foreigners with status of residence without the qualification to work.
As described above, according to the purpose of legislation of Immigration Control Act, aiding and promoting acts against illegal employment are unjustifiable as stipulated in "illegal employment promotion crime" and the application of assistance charges is illegal.
In 2015, in Osaka, a Chinese international student whose status of residence is "study abroad" was hostessed and criminalized as "illegal work (off-qualification activity)" and became "deportation", but as unjustified We have fought in trial and are innocent.
The reason for the judgment at this time is that it is not the Immigration Act Principle (law) but the by-law (the ministerial ordinance) that it does not permit working hours restriction of 28 hours a week or "non-qualified employment" in sex business as a non-qualification activity , He dismissed prosecution as not being in violation of the law.
It is human rights abuses against foreigners to declare foreigners to live in Japan if they do crime. And if foreigners can live in Japan, it is abuse of assistance to assume that foreigners commit crimes if they commit a crime, people can not live with peace of mind.
In relation to illegal employment made by a foreigner, it was not a "crime for promoting illegal employment" that stipulated the punishment for that aid act, but because of making it possible for him to live in Japan, it was a causal relationship to criminal punishment It is illegal to abuse assistance charges to apply the criminal law "assistance crime" on the grounds of the aid of "action to cancel the status of residence".
Because I offered "(Contents false) Employment Contract" (requested by the section manager) to the former offender for the reason for assisting illegal employment, it was possible to obtain the status of residence easily (at the discretion of the Minister of Justice).
Because I got my status of residence, I gained immigration visa (at the discretion of Minister for Foreign Affairs) and I was able to live in Japan.
I was able to work illegally because I was able to live in Japan. The criminal law assistance crime is applied in a causal relationship with,
As mentioned above, even if it is a "false employment contract document", there is no legal basis for "delivery of status of residence" or "delivery of immigration visa", there is no clear causal relation To make it criminal as it was in Japan, it is malignant discrimination against foreigners, it is human rights violation, and it is illegal because of abuse of assistance crime.
In Japan, we refer to such a far-cryptic reasoning theory as "argue-making argument if wind blows". If the wind blows, why will the tuya be profitable ...? If you talk about causality, it is long.
And there are various scenarios. In other words, the cause-and-effect relationship is "frustration".
These customs of applying assistance crime by far causal relationship are rooted, and it is a terrible Japanese society.
In addition,
I made it possible to live in Japan, so I was able to "work illegally". Therefore, although it says that the causal relationship is obvious, I lent a room of apartment to a foreigner so that I could live in Japan. As being able to live in Japan, it is possible for homicide to be able to be applied to the owner of the apartment, the aiding crime of "murder guilt" can be applied? What? What? As this answer,
The interrogation police officer said, "President, because the Chinese have worked illegally, we can financially assist illegal work ... but if the Chinese were murderers, it would be an aid for murder guilt! Please put on! "
We are already applying "murder guilt" of murder to the owner of the apartment.
If you think that Japanese who treat foreigners equally is not interesting, we are doing the murder as an assistant to this Japanese in discretion. The root of human rights abuses is because arbitrary foreign exclusion habits are rooted.
Therefore, the offense of police officers and prosecutors is "criminal charges of false charges" of the criminal law and is "crime of abuse of the special public officer's authority."
"Crime of abuse of the special public servant's authority" is a crime established by abusing its authority and arresting and imprisoning others.
Criminal constitution requirements of official abuses of special public officials As to the suitability,
① The principal is a special civil servant, · · · facts It is police officers, prosecutors and judges.
② Having arrested and confined a person · · · It was arrested and confined as a fact.
③ abuse of authority, established by. .... Whether abusing official authority, but abuse is the fact that by illegally exercising authority on duties,
In addition to assault and intimidation, lawfully and virtually against victims,
To the extent that we can not help accepting the result,
It is supposed to be sufficient as long as it squeezes freedom of decision making.
Regarding job authority, as for police officers,
Article 189 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Police officers shall perform duties as judicial police officials, respectively, pursuant to other laws or by the National Public Safety Commission or the prefectural public safety commission.
When judicial police officials think that there is a crime, they will investigate the perpetrator and evidence.
It is stipulated.
Therefore, it is illegal to conduct investigation, arrest and confinement, even though crime is not imagined, that is, it is not in violation of any law, it is a crime of abuse of the special public officer's authority.
We illegally disclose express warrant arrest warrants, etc. to oppose freedom of decision making and exercise authority on duties.
Criminal offense is established because this obvious illegal act is abuse of official absence because abuse of special officials abuses official abilities does not require deliberation.
2-4. Quality of Japanese lawyers
Democratic councilor members introduced to the Democratic counsel lawyer.
Lawyers' answers,
Since the former offender (alien of illegal employment crime) is imprisoned for illegal work,
It is an answer that application of assistance crime is effective.
This is not an answer. It merely states the effectiveness of assistance crime in criminal law.
Assistance charges are not imposed for assistance in case of "fine offense is fine".
The number of charges written in the indictment is prescribed in the "illegal employment promotion charges" prescribed by Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73,
It is not an aiding act against illegal employment.
Illegal employment is not related, refers to the act of revocation of the status of residence that the former offender is administrative punishment,
The provider of "content false employment contract" is said to be an aiding act of illegal employment,
We are counting on it.
If the event of the case is true, will the criminal aid crime be applied more than "cancellation of status of residence" prescribed by Article 4 of the Immigration Act 22 which is a special law prescribing this event?
I can not state the reason for this.
Of course, if it states, since the provision prescribed by the special law takes precedence over the law of law,
The criminal assistance crime should not be applicable. This is the qualification of a Japanese lawyer.
2-5. Police officers and public prosecutors are not guilty of applied crime by the logic of law.
The policeman says, in the interrogation,
"Do not lick Sakuradamon (a place name of the Metropolitan Police Department)! Accept (sin) in general theory!"
The prosecutor, in an interrogation, says,
"Admit (sin) in general theory! (Fines),
if you accept it (fines), you will be sentenced to a fine,
if you do not approve (crime) you will be sentenced to imprisonment]
There is no other country than a country that makes a criminal in general theory.
What I'm directly concerned with is that four Chinese who occurred in 2010, both of whom worked at a restaurant, were illegally employed (illegal work) (violation of the Immigration Act) (four activities) Employment contracts ", and I was considered as an aid and an accomplice in Gungaku (Gold Military University) who was deemed to assist the illegal employment crime. (I am not accepting but I am complaining and accusing)
Drivers related to the Philippine Embassy, which occurred in 2014 and 2015, were reported to have worked in a landscaping shop, and all of them were illegally working in violation of Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of qualification), " Embassy officials and diplomats in the Philippines, who were deemed to have assisted against the illegal workers' hands as if they handed in an employment contract, are exactly the same as mine incidents occurred in 2010, they are stated. (I am not accepting, but I am charged with it)
The Government of Japan will submit it as a proof of conducting contrary to international law on a daily basis.
Although this is described as a reference, the Japanese government, for illegal employment,
It is not unchanged not to illegally dispose of employed businesses as "illegal employment promotion crime"
For foreigners, we operate with two standards.
1. If an alien who becomes an administrative punishment for withdrawal from overseas already has illegally worked in a state of violation of Immigration Act, it is allowed to leave the country without having to dispose of it as "illegal work crime" I am sending a facility and leaving the country for overseas reasons.
2. In the case of illegal employment of activities other than the status of residence with regular status of residence, only foreigners are made a violation of Immigration Act (illegal employment due to activities other than the status of immigration), imprisoned for a small amount, criminalized, I am allowed to leave the country because of being disposed of.
However, even in this case, it is an arbitrary disposition against foreigners, so it is a violation of international law.
Most cases are this case, so there are countless victims.
I think that there are a few cases of imprisonment for imprisonment for us in 2010 or Philippine people in 2014 to 2015 due to illegal employment crimes contrary to international law, or imprisonment of criminal law for violation of applicable laws,
In any case, it is a serious human rights violation of International Law violation, so please respond promptly.
The reason why "illegal employment promotion crime" is not applied is,
Because the business says "I did not know such a law", because it is not applied,
In the revision of July 2010, the Diet was implemented with a grace period of 3 years, with the addition of the provision that "Such laws are unknown unknown" clause,
Even in the case of the Philippine Embassy in 2014 - 2015, as evidenced by the fact that illegally employed businesses have not been disposed of, illegally employed foreigners are arbitrarily criminalized as they are proved Please urgently, please relieve.
この文書を読む前に、
「１．申立ての要約』をお読みください。
２．申立ての事実
違法行為の事実と状況を時系列順に詳述して説明します。
特定のケースの評価と検討に関連する可能性のある事項をすべて含めて説明します。
事実や状況が『道上の犯罪』（私たちの人権をどのように侵害』をしているかを考えて説明します。
．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．
２－１．事件の発生経緯
株式会社Ｌ社の社長である私（長野）は、定期入社（２００９年４月）で採用予定の中国人４人（正犯）に対し、２００９年１月頃までに採用予定（内定）を出した。
しかし２００８年秋のリーマンショックで、受注予定が激減したため、２００９年３月に、採用予定（内定）を取り消した。
採用予定の中国人は、既に、在留資格の更新を終えていた。
以前、入国管理局からは、在留資格は、日本国が、雇用予定の会社に対して交付するものではなく、外国人個人に交付するものなので、 採用を取消をしても、既に発行した在留資格の取消はできない。また、在留資格を得た外国人が、在留資格の範囲であれば、どこの会社で働くかは自由であると指導を受けていた。
Ｌ社に就職できなかった中国人４人（正犯）は、大学卒業後も、学生時代にアルバイトで働いていた飲食店で、引き続き働いていて、２０１０年５月から６月に、入管法７０条の４（在留資格外活動による不法就労）で、逮捕された。
しかし、正犯を雇用した飲食店の事業者は、いずれの事業者も、入管法で定める７３の２条（不法就労助長罪）で逮捕されず、何の処分も受けていない。
取調べ調書をみると、雇用した事業者は、いずれも、中国人4人が、働く資格があることを、確認することを、怠っていたと供述している。
私および元部下である採用を担当した中国人、KinGungaku（金軍学）は、７３の２条に規定する行為をしていないにも関わらず、
採用予定の正犯に、雇用する意思がないのに「内容虚偽の雇用雇用書」を提供したので、正犯は容易に、「技術」や「人文国際」在留資格が得られた。
在留資格が得られたので、日本に在住できた。日本に在住できたので、正犯は不法就労をすることができた。
よって、「内容虚偽の雇用契約者を提供した行為と不法就労との因果関係は明白である。」としての刑法の幇助罪が適用され、２０１０年６月に逮捕され、７月に起訴された。
私は、東京地方裁判所で２０１１年4月に、懲役1年半の実刑、および罰金１００万円の刑事罰がで下され、東京高等裁判所へ控訴するが２０１１年１０月に棄却され、最高裁判所に上告するが、「適用法誤りによる上告は刑事訴訟法上審議対象外」として、２０１２年２月棄却された。
そして、２０１２年３月、東京拘置所に収監され、翌４月、栃木県の刑務所に収監され、２０１３年３月に刑の満期で出所しました。
共犯とされた、KinGungaku（金軍学）は、私と同じ刑罰でしたが、彼は罪を認めたので、実刑でなく、執行猶予となり、２０１０年１０月末、中国へ強制送還された。
正犯4人は、２０１０年８月ころまでには、懲役１年半及び罰金刑となりましたが、執行猶予で中国に強制送還されています。
私および中国人の正犯４人や私の共犯とされた中国人KinGungaku（金軍学）は、
「すべて国民は、法の下に平等であって、人種、信条、性別、社会的身分又は門地により、
政治的、経済的又は社会的関係において、差別されない。」、
そして、日本国憲法の３１条、
「何人も、法律の定める手続によらなければ、その生命若しくは自由を奪はれ、又はその他の刑罰を科せられない。 に照らして、何の違反もしていません（後述）。
「法律の定める手続」とは国会で立法された法律を言います。
なお、日本国も批准している「市民権と政治的権利に関する国際規約」
第2条（1）（3）、第4条（1）、
第5条（2）、
第9条(1) (5)、
第13条、
第14条（６）、
第15条（1）、
第16条、
第17条、第
26条、に明確に反しており、
なんら罪に問われることはなく冤罪です。
日本の司法制度では、「再審請求制度」がありますが、「適用法誤り」の理由では、請求できません。但し、事件にかかわった警察官などの犯罪が確定すると、再審請求ができます。
警察官や検察官、裁判官の犯罪は明らかです。その罪は、
何ら犯罪にならないのに、逮捕・監禁したので、刑法の「特別公務員職権乱用罪」です。
何ら犯罪にならないのに、虚偽の理由で刑罰を科そうとして告訴したので、刑法の「虚偽告訴罪」です。犯罪構成理由として、「故意」は必要ありません。
それで、東京地方検察庁や警視庁などに、私に関するものは「告訴状」として、中国人やフィリッピン人に対するものは「告発状」として提出しますが、何度、提出しても、犯罪が明らかでないとして、受理しません。
日本は、検察官に「起訴独占権」を与えていますので、検察が「起訴状」「告発状」を受理しない限り、刑事事件として裁判ができません。
検察が、「起訴状」「告発状」を受理し「不起訴」とした場合は、裁判所の「検察審査会」に「審査請求」をすることで、強制起訴の方法がありますが、
検察が不受理ですので、最後の救済の方法も枯渇してしまいました。
「東京検察審査会」にも、棄却を覚悟で「審査請求」をしましたが、
検察が、不起訴としていないとの理由で、棄却されました。
「特別公務員職権乱用罪」および「虚偽告訴罪」の提訴事項が、迫っております。国際刑事裁判所には、緊急に、対応をお願いいたします。
この事件は、国家による、権力の行使で、不可抗力ですので、時効は停止していると考えます。
２－２．以下は、例として私（長野）の告訴状をもとに、
警察官および検察官の犯罪事実で、権利の侵害を記載します。
１．警察官らは、平成２２年６月１４日１１時半頃、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、私（長野）は何ら犯罪が思科されないし、犯罪行為をしていないにもかかわらず、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を不法就労した正犯に提供したことは、犯罪が思科されるとして、世田谷署において私（長野）を入管法違反（資格外活動による不法就労）の幇助罪の容疑で、事前に東京簡易裁判所に逮捕令状を嘘偽請求し、私（長野）は持っている職権を乱用し内容嘘偽の不法な逮捕令状で、意思決定の自由を圧迫し、私（長野）には何の義務もない、不法な逮捕・監禁を行ない取調べを行ない、その後も、月島署に移送して不法な逮捕監禁を行ない取調べを行ったものです。よって、警察官らの行為は、刑法１９４条 特別公務員職権濫用罪に該当します。
２．警察官らは、平成２２年６月１５日前頃、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、私（長野）は何ら犯罪が思科されないし、犯罪行為をしていないにもかかわらず、手柄を得たい私（長野）は、不法就労した正犯を通常の対処と異なり、入管法違反（資格外活動）で厳しく懲役刑にすることを画策し、それには国際法に反しないために、入管法の幇助者である事業者を不法就労助長罪で処罰せねばならないが、情により処罰したくないので、私（長野）を代わりの幇助者としてでっち上げ刑法で処罰させることを画策し、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を不法就労した正犯に提供したことは、犯罪であるとして、月島署に逮捕監禁中の私（長野）を入管法違反（資格外活動による不法就労）の幇助罪の容疑などで、東京地方検察庁に内容嘘偽の罪名で虚偽告訴（送検）したものです。警察官らの行為は、刑法１７２条 虚偽告訴罪に該当します。
３．検察官は、平成２２年６月１６日頃、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、私（長野）は何ら犯罪が思科されないし、犯罪行為をしていないにもかかわらず、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を不法就労した正犯に提供したことは、犯罪が思科されるとして、月島署に逮捕・監禁中の私（長野）を入管法違反（資格外活動による不法就労）の幇助罪の容疑などで、不法に勾留請求を行ない、勾留状を不法に取得して、職権を乱用し内容嘘偽の不法な勾留状で、意思決定の自由を圧迫し、私（長野）には何の義務もない、不法な逮捕監禁を行ない取調べを行ったものです。よって、検察官らの行為は、刑法１９４条 特別公務員職権濫用罪に該当します。
４．検察官は勾留請求に対し、平成２２年６月２４日頃、弁護人は、拘留取消の請求を東京地方裁判所へ請求したが、私（長野）の検察官は裁判官の意見の求めに対し、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、不法にも、取消を認めずの通知を発行させ、意思決定の自由を圧迫し、私（長野）には何の義務もない、不法な逮捕監禁を行なったものです。よって、検察官らの行為は、刑法１９４条 特別公務員職権濫用罪に該当します。
５．警察官らは、平成２２年７月３日頃、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、私（長野）は何ら犯罪が思科されないし、・・・
中略、・・・・私（長野）は持っている職権を乱用し内容嘘偽の不法な逮捕令状で、意思決定の自由を圧迫し、私（長野）には何の義務もない、不法な逮捕・監禁を行ない、その後も、世田谷署及び荻窪署に移送して、不法な逮捕監禁を行ない取調べを行ったものです。よって、警察官らの行為は、刑法１９４条 特別公務員職権濫用罪に該当します。
６．私（長野）の検察官は、平成２２年７月３日頃、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、私（長野）は何ら犯罪が思科されないし、犯罪行為をしていないにもかかわらず、・・・・中略・・・職権を乱用し内容嘘偽の不法な勾留状で、意思決定の自由を圧迫し、私（長野）には何の義務もない、不法な逮捕監禁を行ない取調べを行ったものです。検察官らのの行為は、刑法１９４条 特別公務員職権濫用罪に該当します。
７．警察官らは、平成２２年７月４日前頃、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、私（長野）は何ら犯罪が思科されないし、犯罪行為をしていないにもかかわらず、・・・・中略・・・
東京地方検察庁に内容嘘偽の罪名で虚偽告訴（追加送検）したものです。よって、警察官らの行為は、刑法１７２条 虚偽告訴罪に該当します。
８．検察官は、平成２２年７月２４日頃、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、私（長野）は何ら犯罪が思科されないし、犯罪行為をしていないにもかかわらず、手柄を得たい私（長野）は、不法就労した正犯を通常の対処と異なり、入管法違反（資格外活動）で厳しく懲役刑にすることを画策し、それには国際法に反しないために、入管法の幇助者である事業者を不法就労助長罪で処罰せねばならないが、情により処罰したくないので、私（長野）を代わりの幇助者としてでっち上げ刑法で処罰させることを画策し、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を不法就労した正犯に提供したことは犯罪として、荻窪署に逮捕・監禁中の私（長野）を入管法違反（資格外活動による不法就労）の幇助罪で、東京地方裁判所に虚偽告訴（起訴）をしたものです。よって、検察官らの行為は、刑法１７２条 虚偽告訴罪に該当します。
９．公判担当の検察官は、取調べの検察官より引き継ぎを受け、平成２２年７月下旬頃より、平成２３年６月２４日頃まで、持っている職権を不法に乱用して、私（長野）は何ら犯罪が思科されないし、犯罪行為をしていないにもかかわらず、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を不法就労した正犯に提供したことは、犯罪であるとして、東京拘置所に収監中の私（長野）を入管法違反（資格外活動による不法就労）の幇助罪の被告として釈放せず、そして同年１０月末頃、公判において不法な内容虚偽の起訴状を読み上げ公判を開始し、意思決定の自由を圧迫し、私（長野）には何の義務もない、不法な逮捕監禁をして公判を行った。
そして又、弁護人は保釈請求を毎月のように請求するが、私（長野）は毎回、裁判官に保釈を認めない意見を出し、不法な保釈請求却下の通知書を発行させ、意思決定の自由を圧迫し、私（長野）には何の義務もない、不法な逮捕監禁を行ない公判を行ったものです。よって、検察官らの行為は、刑法１７２条 虚偽告訴罪に該当します。
２－３．「何ら犯罪が思科されないし、犯罪行為をしていないとは」は
日本は、「不法就労」に対して、
不法就労した外国人を「出入国及び難民認定法（以下「入管法」と言う）」７０条「不法就労罪」で刑事処分し、
不法就労させた事業者を入管法７３の２条「不法就労助長罪」で、両者を平等に刑事処分することで、
日本国憲法の「法の下での平等」や恣意的に外国人を処分することを禁じた「国際法」（市民権と政治的権利に関する国際規約）に反しないように立法しています。
しかし、実態は、（不法就労させた事業者）を「不法就労助長罪」で処分せず、（不法就労した外国人だけ）を「不法就労罪」で刑事処分し、国外追放にしています。
これは、外国人を恣意的に差別することを禁じた国際法に反しています。日本国憲法の法の下での平等にも反しています。
不法就労させた「不法就労助長罪」で事業者を処分しないのであれば、
不法就労させられた外国人も、処分なし（無罪）が法の論理です。
そうであれば当然、如何なる、不法就労の幇助者もいないということです。
これが法の下での統治であり、基本的人権の尊重であり、国際法の遵守です。
２０１０年に発生した入管法違反幇助事件では、もっと悪質な、犯罪行為をしました。
不法就労した外国人だけを「不法就労罪」で罰金刑にして国外追放していたのですが、
「不法就労助長罪」の事業者にかわる、第三者の「幇助者」をでっち上げ、
平等に処分したように見せかけるため、第三者を刑事処分して、不法就労した外国人を罰金刑でなく「懲役刑」にして国外追放したのです。
第三者とは、採用予定の正犯に雇用契約書を提供した私（長野）と共犯とされた元部下の中国人KinGungaku「金軍学」です。
私と共犯とされたKinGungaku「金軍学」は、中国人の不法就労に対して、その幇助行為をしたとして、国際法を遵守するため創設された、不法就労に対する幇助行為や助長行為を規定した特別法である「不法就労助長罪」でなく、
不法にも、「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」を提供したから、在留資格が容易に得られた。それで日本におられた。日本におられたから不法就労できた。との因果関係で、
一般法である刑法の「幇助罪」を乱用され実刑（懲役刑）を受けました。
こうした事件は、私たちだけでなく、私の知る限り、２０１４年、２０１５年にはフィリピン大使館職員や外交官まで同様の不法な論理で「幇助罪」が適用され刑事処分されております。
もはや、日常的に、国際法違反が行われていますので、緊急に対応をお願いします。
それで、この事件も含めて、国連高等弁務官事務所に苦情の提訴をいたします。
（私自身に関係するものは「告訴状」、中国人やフィリッピン人に関係するものは「告訴状」として、提出してきましたが、不受理になっております。
私の主張は、 刑法の「幇助罪」適用は、以下の理由により適用法違反による犯罪行為です。罪名は刑法の「虚偽告訴罪」であり、「特別公務員職権乱用罪」です。
１．不法就労に対する幇助罪は、特別法にあたる、入管法の７３の２条「不法就労助長罪」で規定されています。
正犯や警察官、検察官も認めるように、私やKinGungaku（金軍学）は、「不法就労助長罪」に規定する行為はしていません。
※起訴状に書かれている「訴因」は、入管法第２２の４条の４に記載する、行政処分である、在留資格の取消行為に対する、幇助行為を指していますので、適用法違反です。
正犯を雇用した事業者は何れも、処分なしで、入管法が規定する「不法就労助長罪」で処分されていません。
そうであれば、雇用され不法就労させられた正犯も、処分なしが、法の下での平等です。したがって無罪です。
そうであれば、私を含め、不法就労に対する、如何なる幇助者も存在しないということです。
2．次に、刑法の「幇助罪」適用の因果関係として、「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」の提供が、在留資格の取得を容易にしたと言いますが、不当です。
在留資格を容易に取得させたというが、在留資格の付与条件は法律で規定されておらず、付与条件は未公開で、法務大臣が裁量で付与するものであり、在留資格を容易にしたとは言えません。
仮に、「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」で在留資格を得たとしても、入管法２２の４条の４「在留資格取消」で規定するとおり、不法就労とは別個のものです。
仮に「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」で法務大臣より技術や人文国際の在留資格を得たとしても、技術や人文国際の在留資格の範囲で働いていれば、不法就労（資格外活動）にならないことは自明の理です。したがって在留資格の取得と不法就労とは何ら関係のないものす。
憲法３１条に 「何人も、法律の定める手続によらなければ、その生命若しくは自由を奪はれ、又はその他の刑罰を科せられない。」（法律の定めとは、国会で制定した法律を指します。地方議会で制定した条例も含む）に照らして、
雇用契約書の提出は、法律でも、省令でもなく、課長通達で外国人に提出を求めるもので、採用予定の事業者として協力したものであり、
仮に虚偽であるとしても、法務大臣が裁量で与える事案について、刑事罰を科す根拠法がありません。唯一あるのは、法務大臣は、その対処として、入管法で、刑事処分ではなく、行政処分として、「在留資格」を取消ことができるとしています。
在留資格の付与は法務大臣の裁量ですが、法務大臣は法律ではない法務省の「省令」で、技術や人文国際については、大学、短大等を卒業して専門知識をもっていることを付与方針として規定していますので、「卒業証書」であれば在留資格付与の大きな要因だと推測できますが、雇用契約書が在留資格の取得を容易にするとは言えません。
在留資格を得られたから本邦におられた。本邦におられたから不法就労できたと言うが、
在留資格は付与条件を未公開で法務大臣が裁量で与えるものです。
在留資格を受けても、更に入国許可（パスポートへの証印）も許可条件を未公開で、外務大臣が裁量で許可を与えて在住（入国）が可能になるものです。よって、雇用契約書が虚偽だとしても両大臣の裁量権限を容易に左右できるとは言えません。
事実として、在留資格は法務大臣が裁量で付与するものですから、私（長野）は、入管との質疑などで在留資格について次のように説明され運用させられていました。
１）「卒業証書」で在留資格要件が満たされ専門知識があれば、雇用会社が不適当若しくは雇用契約書が虚偽などの場合は、外国人に対して、雇用契約会社を変えさせて再申請させている。
２）雇用契約書を交わした外国人が在留資格を受けて入社しなくとも、在留資格は外国人個人に付与するもので、付与後は、在留資格（技術や人文国際）の範囲でどこで働こうと自由である。
３）在留資格を取得後、雇用契約会社に入社できなくとも、直ちに在留資格が取消されるのではなく、一定期間内に、在留資格の範囲で雇用先を見つけ就労できる。
よって、「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」の提供が、在留資格の取得を容易にしたとはいえず、また、在留資格の取得に対する幇助行為と不法就労とは何ら、因果関係はありません。
前記したように「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」で、法務大臣より裁量で、技術や人文国際の在留資格を得たとしても、技術や人文国際の在留資格の範囲で働けば、不法就労にならないことは明白で、「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」と不法就労とが、関係のないことは自明の理です。
彼等が不法就労者になったのは、働く資格のない在留資格の外国人を、雇用して、働かせた事業者の責任であることは自明の理であります。
以上により、入管法の立法趣旨どおり、不法就労に対する幇助・助長行為は「不法就労助長罪」に規定するとおりで処分しなければ不当であり、幇助罪の適用は不法です。
２０１５年、大阪で、在留資格が「留学」である、中国人留学生がホステスをして「不法就労罪（資格外活動）」で刑事処分され「国外退去」になりましたが、不当だとして裁判で争い、無罪になっています。
このときの判決理由は、資格外活動として、週に２８時間の就業時間制限や風俗営業での「資格外就労」を認めていないのは、入管法本則（法律）ではなく細則（省令）なので、法律違反ではないとして起訴を退けたのです。
外国人を、日本に在住できるようにしたら、犯罪をすると断定するのは、外国人に対する人権侵害です。そして、外国人を日本に在住できるようにしたら、その外国人が犯罪を犯せば幇助罪だとするのは幇助罪の乱用で、国民は安心して生活できません。
外国人のした不法就労に対して、その幇助行為の処罰を定めた「不法就労助長罪」でなく、日本に在住できるようにしたから犯罪ができた、との因果関係で、何ら刑事罰にならない「在留資格取消行為」の幇助を理由にして、刑法の「幇助罪」を適用するのは、幇助罪の乱用で違法です。
不法就労の幇助理由に、（課長通達で要求された）「（内容虚偽の）雇用契約書」を正犯に提供したから、（法務大臣の裁量であるが）在留資格が容易に取得できた。
在留資格が得られたから、（外務大臣の裁量で）入国査証が得られ、日本に在住できた。
日本に在住できたから不法就労ができた。との因果関係で刑法の幇助罪を適用していますが、
前記したように、仮に「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」であっても「在留資格の交付」や「入国査証の交付」とは、何ら法的な根拠がなく、明らかに因果関係がなく、又、日本におられるようにしたから犯罪ができるとすることは、外国人に対する悪質な差別であり、人権侵害であり、また、幇助罪の乱用で違法です。
日本では、こうした遠い因果関係の論法を「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる論法」と言います。風が吹けば、何故、桶屋が儲かるのか・・・？因果関係を話せば長いのです。
そしてシナリオは色々あります。つまり、因果関係は「こじつけ」なのです。
こうした、遠い因果関係で幇助罪を適用する習慣が根付いており、恐ろしい日本社会です。
日本に在住できるようにしたから「不法就労」ができた。よって、因果関係は明白であると言うが、外国人にアパートの一室を貸して、日本に在住できるようにした。日本に在住できたから殺人ができたとしてアパートのオーナーに「殺人罪」の幇助罪が適用できるのでしょうかか？？？この答えとして、
取調べの警察官は、「社長、中国人が不法就労したから、不法就労に対する幇助罪で済むけど・・・・中国人が、殺人をしていたら、殺人罪に対する、幇助罪ですよ！気をつけてくださいよ！」と言いました。
既に、アパートのオーナーに、殺人罪の「幇助罪」を適用しているのです。
外国人を平等に扱う日本人を面白く無いと思えば、この日本人に対して、裁量で殺人の幇助者にもしているのです。人権侵害の根本は、恣意的な外国人排除の習慣が根付いているからです。
よって警察官や検察官らの罪名は刑法の「虚偽告訴罪」であり、「特別公務員職権乱用罪」です。
「特別公務員職権濫用罪」は、その職権を濫用して、他人を逮捕、監禁することによって成立する罪です。
特別公務員職権濫用罪の犯罪構成要件該当性については、
①主体が特別公務員であること、・・・・事実 警察官、検察官や裁判官らです。
②人を逮捕・監禁したこと 、・・・・事実として逮捕・監禁されました。
③職権を濫用したこと、によって成立します。・・・・職権を濫用したか否かですが、濫用とは、職務上の権限を不法に行使することで、その手段や方法は、
暴行・脅迫だけでなく、法律上・事実上、被害者に対して、
その結果を受け入れざるえない程度に、
意思決定の自由を圧迫するものであれば足りるとされています。
職務権限について、警察官について言えば、
刑事訴訟法 第百八十九条 警察官は、それぞれ、他の法律又は国家公安委員会若しくは都道府県公安委員会の定めるところにより、司法警察職員として職務を行う。
司法警察職員は、犯罪があると思料するときは、犯人及び証拠を捜査するものとします。
と規定されています。
よって、犯罪が思料されない、つまり、なんら法に違反していないのに、捜査、逮捕、監禁することは、不法な行為であり、特別公務員職権乱用罪にあたります。
不法な内容嘘偽の逮捕状等を提示するなどして意思決定の自由を圧迫し職務上の権限を行使しています。
特別公務員職権濫用罪は故意を必要としていませんので、この明らかな不法な行為は、職権乱用であるので、犯罪は成立します。
２－４．日本の弁護士の資質
弁護士の答は、
幇助罪の適用は有効との回答です。
これは答えになっていません。単に刑法における幇助罪の有効を述べているだけです。
幇助罪は「正犯が罰金刑」の場合は幇助罪は科されなません。
起訴状に書かれた訴因は、入管法７３の２条が規定する「不法就労助長罪」に規定する、
不法就労に対する幇助行為ではありません。
不法就労とは、関係がない、正犯が行政処分である在留資格の取消行為をしたことを指して、
「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」の提供者は、不法就労の幇助行為であると言わんとして、
訴因としてますす。
事件の事象が真実ならば、この事象を規定している、特別法である入管法２２の４条４が規定する「在留資格取消』よりも、刑法の幇助罪が適用されるか？
この理由を述べらることが出来ないのです。
もちろん、述べるのであれば、法の論理により、特別法で規定のある条文が優先されるので、
刑法の幇助罪は適用できないはずです。これが日本の弁護士の資質です。
２－５．警察官や検察官は、法の論理で、適用される罪が言えないのです。
警察官は、取調べにおいて、こう言うのです。
「桜田門（警視庁のある地名)を舐めるんじゃない！一般論で（罪を）認めろ！」
検察官は、取り調べで、こう言うのです。
「一般論で（罪を）認めろ！（罪を）認めれば罰金刑にする、（罪を）認めなければ懲役刑にする」
一般論で犯罪人にする国は、日本以外にありません。
私に直接関係するのは、2010年に発生した、中国人4人が、いずれも飲食店で働いたとして入管法違反の不法就労罪（資格外活動）、その4人に、「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したとして、その不法就労罪に対する幇助罪とされた、私および共犯とされたinGungaku（金軍学）です。（不受理ですが告訴・告発をしている）
2014年、2015年に発生した、フィリッピン大使館に関係する運転手らが、いずれも造園屋で働いたとして入管法違反の不法就労罪（資格外活動）、その運転手らに「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したとして、その不法就労罪に対する幇助罪とされた、大使館職員やフィリッピン国外交官は、2010年に発生した私の事件とまったく同じですから、記載したものです。（不受理ですが告発をしている）
日本政府は、国際法に反する行為を日常的に行っている証として、提出するものです。
これは参考として記載しますが、日本政府は、不法就労に対して、
雇用した事業者を「不法就労助長罪」で、不法に処分しないことは変わりませんが、
外国人に対しては、二つの基準で運用しています。
１．オーバーステイなどで、すでに、国外退去の行政処分となる外国人が、入管法違反の状態で、不法就労をした場合は、「不法就労罪」で処分しなくとも、国外退去させられますので、入管施設送りにして、オーバーステイなどの理由で国外退去させています。
２．正規の在留資格で、資格外活動の不法就労をした場合は、外国人だけを、入管法違反（資格外活動による不法就労）にして、少額の罰金刑にして、刑事処分をして、刑事処分されたことを理由に国外退去させています。
しかし、この場合も、外国人に対する恣意的な処分ですから、国際法違犯です。
ほとんどのケースが、このケースですから、被害者は無数にいます。
2010年の私たちや2014－2015年のフィリッピン人に対する、国際法に反する不法就労罪で懲役刑にしたり、適用法違反で刑法の幇助罪適用による懲役刑は少数のケースと思いますが、
いずれにしても、国際法違反の重大な人権違反ですので、速やかに対応をお願いします。
なお、「不法就労助長罪」の適用しないのは、
事業者が、「そんな法律は知らなかった」と言うので適用でしていないとの理由で、
国会は、2010年7月の改正で、「そんな法律は知らなかったはゆるさない」条項を追加して、3年間の猶予期間をおいて実施されましたが、
2014－2015年のフィリッピン大使館事件でも、証明されるように、相変わらず、不法に雇用した事業者は処分されずに、不法に雇用された外国人だけが、恣意的に刑事処分されていますので、緊急に、救済して下さい。
