Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Appealed to ICC 6. Illegality of misappropriation case application law violation of immigration law

6. Illegality of misappropriation case application law violation of immigration law

 

    Revision 1 March 1, 2016

 

We collaborate with the press, operate information, justify illegal acts contrary to international law, do illegal judicial administration!

 

We abducted and kept a large amount of foreigners who are unable to compare with the Japanese abductees of North Korea illegally as criminals against international law!

 

The Japanese government continues to serious human rights violations not only by Japanese but also many foreigners now than comfort women comfort women!

 

 

Illegitimate Justice Illegally arrested in 2010, illegal act contrary to international law, collusion with the mass media, justification of information, in violation of the Immigration Control Act violating the Immigration Act, initially "illegal employment" With regard to the aid for assistance of the law, since it is the legislative purpose of adhering to international law to prioritize the special law "illegal employment promotion crime" over the general law, the crime law aid criminal act, It insisted that this law should be completed with the logic of the law.

 

Therefore, although it claimed that the application of criminal law aiding criminal was inappropriate due to misappropriation of applicable law, the Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office rejects it as "being an opinion." So, I got to write down.

 

The act of providing a false employment contract, which is the counsel of the complaint, shall be deemed to be "easy to obtain the status of residence", but the conditions for granting a status of residence are not stipulated by law, I am establishing a graduation qualification but I am doing the administration!

 

We abducted and kept a large amount of foreigners who are unable to compare with the Japanese abductees of North Korea illegally as criminals against international law!

 

The Japanese government continues to serious human rights violations not only by Japanese but also many foreigners now than comfort women comfort women!

Since details on permission and rejection of status of residence are deemed to be at the discretion of the Minister of Justice, details (such as notifications) have not been disclosed, but since the submission of employment contracts is as stipulated by the section manager, etc., There is no basis for the law stipulated in Article 31, and criminal punishment can not be done.

 

"Contents of False Employment Agreement Acts Assisting in Cancellation of Status of Residence of 22 Article 4 of the Immigration Act"

And since the Minister of Justice gave it under the standards of the ministerial ordinance, the cancellation is also the administrative penalty of the Minister of Justice, claiming that it can not be criminalized as a criminal assistance criminal act as aiding act of illegal employment, but also reject it .

 

Some lawyers say that based on the training at the Institute for Legal Studies and Training, priority is given to the crime aid crime from the special law that was legislated in the National Assembly.

 

After all, as this country seems not to be ruled under the law, even if it is said that it is "opinion" as one of the citizens, after all I am here to organize this problem and violate the applicable law I will argue.

 

And as soon as possible, we will comply with the international law ratified by the National Assembly, become a country governed and punished under the law established in the Diet, and insist that the basic human rights of the citizens and the people of the world will be protectedPlease listen.

 

 

I. Introduction

The aid for assisting illegal employment of the Immigration Control Act is not a criminal aid for the criminal law but as a special law an "illegal employment promotion crime" has been enacted in the Immigration Control Act, which should be completed by applying this law, Contrary to the purpose of legislation, foreigners only do not punish the business, illegally arrested and arrested, arbitrarily criminal disposition by illegal work crime, we conduct judicial administration contrary to international law.

 

1. Also, in this case, we applied the criminal assistance criminal penalty to administrative penalty acts unfairly, so the actual condition of illegal judicial judgment in Japan against the 31th criminal code has been clarified.

 

In this case, judicial officials collaborate with the mass media and manipulate the information and publicize it as if arrested because they did the act prescribed in "illegal employment promotion crime" to citizens, but the indictment is a criminal assault for murder To the same extent as applied, for the illegal employment of the Immigration Control Act, the assistance criminal act, the general law, was applied and received a penalty.

 

Foreigners of former offenders are arbitrarily contrary to international law, only foreigners are criminalized and punished for "illegal employment crime" and they are deported from abroad.

 

Businesses that illegally worked are not punished at all, and this is an arbitrary act prohibited by international law. It is not a country governed under the law. It is not a country that complies with international law.

 

The Japanese government is still giving human rights violations not only to Japanese but also to the people of the world. In my case and Philippine Embassy affair, I and the diplomats and others are applying criminal law aiding criminal law against illegal work due to the aid of "dismissal of status of residence" irrelevant to illegal work, justice The crime is increasingly escalating. It is exactly the same as North Korea. Japan must be a country governed under the law.

 The National Assembly adheres to international law, and against illegal employment, against the loss of employment opportunities of Japanese who are victims, the punishment of foreigners by illegal work crimes, equality, aiding and promotion of business operators Regarding acts, as Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73, we have enacted Article 2 of the Immigration Act for Promoting Illegal Employment. The National Assembly must correct the judicial administration which ignores legislation.

 

 The judicial administration which ignores legislation of the National Assembly conducts illegal arrest and detention, does not rule Japan under the law, does not respect human rights, does not adhere to international law, it is like judicial dictatorship like the North It is.

 

Moreover, the case abuses the crime aided by the criminal law of the general law, Article 31 of the Constitution, "No one is deprived of its life or freedom unless it follows the procedure prescribed by the law, or can not impose any other punishment Contrary to they assume that the documents instructed by the section manager are false, and the crime aid assistance crime is applied.

 The provision of the law refers to the law established by the National Assembly (including the ordinance established by the local council in the precedents).

 

He tried to punish foreigners arbitrarily by ignoring international law without having to punish business operators, in addition to collaborating with the mass media, seemed to citizens arrested the assistant by illegal employment promotion crime On the other hand, in lieu of businesses who made illegal work by misusing the citizens' immigration to the immigration law,

  By providing a false employment contract with a general law, a criminal assistance offense, the status of residence of technology and humanities international (below)

 

2. Because I was able to live in Japan easily because I was able to get it easily, I was abusing the criminal assistance crime with causality that has nothing to do with illegal work as it was possible to work illegally, but in the logic of the law It is illegal to get out.

As if the provision of false employment contracts is based on the application of criminal law aide as absolute terms of granting status of residenceThere are no provisions in this rule regarding the conditions for granting status of residence.

The only regulation (ministerial ordinance), the Minister of Justice

Technology and Humanities As conditions for giving international status of residence

We have established graduation qualifications (academic background) of universities etcTherefore, important documents to submit are "diplomas" to prove their educational background.

 

 "False Employment Contract" written in the indictment ceremony is determined by the section manager etc. and is not stipulated in the law stipulated in Article 31 of the Constitution, it is not absolute document of the status of residence granted, It can not be said to be a heavyweight document that imposes crime.

 

In addition, the status of residence to give is given to the individuals of the foreigners by the Japanese nation, and work restricts by permitting employment within the status of residence, but the place of employment is not a company offering employment contracts, but which company or organization This is freedom to work.

Technology and Humanities Even if a foreign national who got an international status of residence qualifies to submit a false employment contract and obtain a status of residence, if a diploma with conditions to receive technology and humanities is true, Technology and Humanities It is legitimate to acquire international status of residence. Also, if you work in a qualified position you will not be illegally employed.

 

The causal relation that the former offender became illegal work is knowing that the former offender is the status of residence of technology and humanities international,

Because it is an illegal act of a business operator who worked in a job outside the status of qualification, the penalties are punishment acts including urging aid to illegal employment under Article 2 of Article 73 of the same law, so the penal law of the general law The application of criminal assistance charges is contrary to the law's law.

 

Also, if you do not work at a company applying for a status of residence, when the alien made a criminal act such as illegal work or murder, you provided a false employment contract so that you are in Japan and helped criminal acts If it is applied as a crime aid assistance crime without any causal relationship with crime, the immigration administration in our country will not be established. Moreover, companies can not recruit foreigners with confidence.

 

. The cause-and-effect relationship of the original judgment decision is a judgment that insults abusing assistance crime.

Application of fraudulent criminal law aid forced by force without applying "illegal employment promotion crime" stipulated as an aid / promotion act against illegal employment Contents false provision of employment contracts facilitate acquisition of status of residence I was able to live in Japan. Because it was possible to live in Japan, it is judged that I was able to work illegally, the causal relationship between provision of false employment contract and illegal worker's crime is clear, ignoring the special law, abused the ausal guilty sentence .

 

Content permitting such a judgment, the provision of false employment contracts made it easy to acquire the status of residence and lived in Japan. Because I could live in Japan, it would be obvious that the causal relationship of the murder was clear as a murder, but it is frightening. It is abuse of assistance sins which is not permitted by the logic of law.

 

3. For Japan, foreign labor with simple labor is not allowed except for interns and trainees. However, since the Minister of Justice gives foreign workers with professional skills to the national interests of Japan granting their status of residence of international skills and humanities on the basis of educational background etc., Japan Even if you are in Japan, you can work if you are within your status of residence and there is no causal relationship with illegal work.

AlsoThe status of residence is given to foreign nationals whose Minister of Justice meets certain conditions such as academic background, but the foreign visa to Japan is given by the Foreign Minister.

 

 Furthermore, since the indicia to the visa is given to foreigners, there are also national interests etc. and the standards are not disclosed.

Even if the document instructed by the section manager 's notice is a false employment contract, it is a document without legal grounds that facilitates the status of residence, aided by criminal law with the causal relationship of' the argument that the tubers will profit if the wind blows' Applying crime is contrary to the purpose of Article 31 of the Constitution.

 

The most important thing is that if you illegally work a foreigner who has illegally worked so that it does not arbitrarily discriminate against foreigners as stipulated by the law under international law or international law, We must punish for "illegal employment promotion crime" including assistance and promotion of employment.

 

In the case of illegal employment, since it unambiguously regulates Hu help and promotion acts in the relationship between those who illegally worked and those who let them work illegally, it is not a crime for assistance of the criminal law as a general law, It is needless to say that we must apply the illegal employment promotion crime ".

 

In a document submitted internationally in technology or humanities, in the case of a diploma, a Japanese spouse and a family register of a family register, which is false or false, the Minister of Justice is an absolute requirement giving the status of residence, so his / her will It is to withdraw the status of residence as administrative disposition.

 

An employment contract, a settlement statement, etc. are to be submitted at the direction of the section manager etc., and the content is false, there is no legal basis for criminal punishment, much less illegal that it was made to be in Japan It is not logical law to declare that it is easy to make a status of residence for illegal employment under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law easy due to causal relationship.

 

Even if you submit a true diploma or content of false employment contract or other documents, even if you get a status of residence, because the conditions of granting international technology and humanities international were satisfied, Minister of Justice acquired a status of residence I granted it. In addition,

 

Indeed, the status of residence granted to foreigners was given to foreigners, and if they are in the qualification, no matter where they work, the employer contract provider can not detain foreigners.

 

Even if you submit false contracts of employment and get the status of residence of international or technical skills, you are satisfied with the absolute requirement of academic background, so you are free to work within the given qualifications.

 

Therefore, due to graduation qualification etc. according to the detailed provisions of Immigration Control Act, there is no causal relation between obtaining legal status of residence of technology and humanities international, and illegal employment. Therefore it can not be applied even to criminal law aid acts.

 

III. At the end

 

A policeman by interrogation admitted in the general theory.

The prosecutor will compel a confession by saying,

"I am great, I admit it if I admit it, I am imprisoned if I do not accept it."

 

 Even at trial, the prosecutor asserted that transfer payment of "Kin" to Lefko is from "Gold Military".

As for Chinese, cash is common sense in these money. Indeed it is asserted that it is not 100% to do the transfer by bank transfer only with "family name = family name".

The Chinese are always "family name / first name".

Mr. T clearly denies the interrogation record at the examinations of the only witnesses, but the judge does not adopt the witness as being scared.

There are many things that I would like to argue that such things are false in facts, but I do not like this, but as I will be governed under the law enacted in Japan by the National Assembly, I would like to state only the criminal justice I am pursuing it.

 

Therefore, please dare to clarify and investigate international law violations and law violations that will seriously become international problems.

 

It seems awful, in the Immigration Control Act regulating the treatment of foreigners, complying with the international law, which is the treaty approved by the National Assembly under the Constitution, is a proposition of the State.

 

The Immigration Control Law stipulates that foreign workers who are not entitled to work by foreign nationals who are not eligible to work so as not to dispose of foreigners arbitrarily against illegal employment depriving opportunities of Japanese citizens to work, Of illegal employment crimes committed to employing foreign nationals who do not qualify for work that is a direct cause and effect relationship with that worker, and punishes promotion acts including illegal acts against illegal employment "illegal work Punishment for sin "in an equal fashion will be given priority over the application of the crime law aid, which is a general law.

 

Contrary to the legislative intent of the National Assembly that adheres to international law for many years,

Judicial administration is a dictatorship, against foreigners unlawfully working against illegal employment, without punishing businesses illegally worked illegal workers punishment for promoting illegal employment, only foreigners arbitrarily fined for penalty for illegal work and imprisonment with work penalties I have punished them and have let them leave the country.

 

In this incident and the Philippine Embassy incident, we have made further leaps and we dispose of third parties for criminal assistance for illegal reasons, and the criminal act is escalating.

 

To conduct illegal punishment is carrying out illegal arrest and detention, and it continues the same act as North Korean illegal Japanese abduction.

 

This Tsuke is larger than Japanese abductees and comfort women, and the number of foreign victims is enormous.

If the Japanese government adheres to international law, apologizes to foreigners arbitrarily disposed of, and promptly restores honor and reparations, the international credit of Japan will be harmed and will impose a great price on later generations It becomes.

 

Prime Minister Abe, for the international community and in holding the G7 in Japan, even at the annual parliamentary greetings, Japan is a country governed under the law, protecting fundamental human rights, complying with international law Although I pride himself,

 

Japan must be governed under the law as soon as possible, protected from fundamental human rights, and must comply with international law.

 

                                                                                      Yasuhiro Nagano

 

 

 

6.入管法違反幇助事件適用法誤りの違法性

 

      改定12016年3月1日

 

 マスコミと共謀し情報操作をし、国際法に反する不法行為を正当化し、不法な司法行政を行っています!

 

 北朝鮮の日本人拉致被害者とは比較できないほど大量の外国人らを、国際法に反して、不法に犯罪人にして拉致監禁しています!

 

 日本政府は日本人だけでなく、今も、多くの外国人に対し、従軍慰安婦より深刻な人権侵害を今も続けています!

 

 

 私は2010に不法に逮捕された、入管法違反幇助事件の適用法違反について、当初は、「不法就労」の幇助罪については、入管法に定めた、特別法である「不法就労助長罪」が、一般法である刑法の幇助罪より優先するのが国際法を順守する立法趣旨であるから法の論理で、この法律で完結すべきであると主張したのです。

 

 よって刑法幇助罪の適用は適用法誤りで不当であると主張したが、東京地検は「持論である」として退けるのです。それで、ぐちゃぐちゃ書くはめになりました。

 

 告訴状の訴因である、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提供した行為が在留資格の取得を容易にしたとするが、在留資格の付与条件は、法律の定めはなく、省令で大学等の卒業資格を定めているが、在留資格許否判断については法務大臣の裁量によるものとされているため、その詳細(通達等)は公開されていないが、雇用契約書の提出は課長通達等で定めたものでものであるから、憲法31条で定める法律の根拠がなく、刑事処罰できない。

 

 起訴状の示す「内容虚偽の雇用契約書は入管法の22の4条の4在留資格取消の幇助行為

を指しており、法務大臣が省令の基準で付与したので、取消も法務大臣行政処分であり、不法就労の幇助行為として刑法幇助罪で刑事処分できないと主張するが、これをも退けるのです。

 

 一部の弁護士は、司法研修所での研修を根拠に、国会で立法した特別法より刑法幇助罪が優先すると言う始末です。

 

 やはり、この国は、法の下で統治されていないようですので、国民の一人として、「持論」だと言われようが、やっぱり私は、ここに、この問題を整理して適用法違反を主張します。

 

 そして一日も早く、国会が批准した国際法を遵守し、国会で成立した法の下で統治され処罰される国となり、国民や世界の民の基本的人権が守られることを主張しますので、耳を傾けてください

 

 

.総論

 入管法不法就労に対する幇助罪は、刑法幇助罪でなく、特別法として入管法に「不法就労助長罪」が制定されており、本来この法律を適用することで完結すべきですが、国会の立法趣旨に反し、事業を処罰せず外国人だけ、不法に逮捕監禁し、恣意的に不法就労罪で刑事処分をおこない、国際法に反した司法行政を行っております。

 

 1.また、この事件では、不敵にも行政処分行為に、刑法の幇助罪を適用したので、刑法31条に反する、日本の不法な司法の実態が明らかになっております。

 

 当事件では、司法関係者はマスコミと共謀し情報操作をして、国民には「不法就労助長罪」に規定する行為をしたので逮捕したように広報するが、起訴状は殺人罪の幇助罪適用と同じよ言うに、入管法不法就労に対して、一般法である刑法の幇助罪が適用され、実刑を受けました。

 

 正犯の外国人も、国際法に反して、恣意的に、外国人だけが「不法就労罪」で刑事処罰され、国外退去されています

 

 不法就労させた事業者は、なんら処罰されない状況が続いており、これは国際法が禁じている、恣意的な行為であります。これでは、法の下で統治されている国とは言えません。また国際法を順守している国とは言えません。

 

 日本政府はいまも、日本人だけでなく世界の民に対しても人権侵害を与えているのです私の事件やフィリピン大使館事件では、不法就労とは何ら関係ない「在留資格取消処分」の幇助行為を理由に、私や外交官らが不法就労に対して刑法の幇助罪が適用され、司法の犯罪はますますエスカレートしています。まさに北朝鮮と同じことを起こしているのです。日本こそ、法の下で統治される国にしなければなりません。

 

 国会は、国際法を順守し、不法就労に対しては、被害者である日本人の雇用機会喪失に対し、外国人を、不法就労罪で処罰し、平等に、事業者らの幇助・助長行為について、特別法として入管法73の2条「不法就労助長罪」を制定しています。国会は、立法を無視する司法行政を正さなければなりません。

 

 国会の立法を無視する司法行政は、不法な逮捕監禁を行い、日本を法の下で統治せず、人権を守らず、国際法を順守しない、北朝鮮と同じような、司法による独裁国家にしています。

 

 しかも、当事件は、一般法の刑法幇助罪を乱用し、憲法31条、「何人も、法律の定める手続によらなければ、その生命若しくは自由を奪はれ、又はその他の刑罰を科せられない。」に反し、 課長通達ごときで指示される書類が虚偽であるとして、刑法幇助罪を適用しています。

 法律の定めとは、国会で制定した法律(判例では地方議会で制定した条例も含む)を指します。

 

 事業者を情により処罰せず、国際法を無視して恣意的に外国人をだけを処罰しようとして、さらに、マスコミと共謀し、国民には不法就労助長罪で幇助者を逮捕したように見せかけ、裏では、国民が入管法に疎いことを悪用し、不法就労させた事業者に代わり、幇助者をでっちあげ、

一般法である刑法幇助罪で、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提供することで、技術や人文国際の在留資格、(下記へ)

 

 2容易に取得させることができたとして、日本に在住できたので、不法就労が可能であったとして、不法就労とはなんら関係のない因果関係で刑法幇助罪を乱用しましたが、法の論理に外れ不法です。

 あたかも、内容虚偽の雇用契約書の提供が、在留資格付与の絶対条件のごとく、刑法幇助罪の適用根拠としているが、在留資格の付与条件について本則では何ら規定はありません

  唯一、細則(省令)で、法務大臣技術や人文国際の在留資格を与える条件として大学等の卒業資格(学歴)を定めています。したがって重用な提出書類は学歴を証明する「卒業証書」です。

 

 起訴状に書かれた「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」は、課長通達などで定めたものであり、憲法31条に規定する法律に規定するものではなく、在留資格付与の絶対書類ではなく、ほう助罪を課すほどの重用書類とはいえません。

 

 また、与える在留資格は日本国家が外国人個人に与えるものであり、在留資格内の就労を認めて就労制限しますが、就労場所は雇用契約書提供の会社でなく、どこの企業、団体で就労するこうは自由です。

 技術や人文国際の在留資格を得た正犯の外国人が、仮に内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提出し在留資格を得たとしても、技術や人文国際を受ける条件の卒業証書が真であれば、技術や人文国際の在留資格の取得は正当です。また当該資格内の職で働いていれば、不法就労とはならないものです。

 

 正犯が、不法就労となった因果関係は、正犯が技術や人文国際の在留資格であるのを承知で、

資格外の職で働かせた、事業者の不法行為であり、その処罰は、不法就労に対するほう助を含めた助長行為として、同法73の2条で処罰規定があるので、一般法の刑法ほう助罪よりも優先されるもので、刑法幇助罪の適用は法の論理に反します。

 

 また、在留資格申請企業で働かない場合、その外国人が不法就労や殺人などの犯罪行為をした際、偽の雇用契約書を提供して日本におられるようにしたから、犯罪行為をほう助したものであるとして、犯罪とはなんら因果関係のないのに、刑法幇助罪を適用するのであれば、我が国の入管行政は成り立たちません。また企業は安心して外国人の採用ができません。

 

.原審判決書の言う因果関係は幇助罪を乱用した侮辱する判決です。

 不法就労に対しての幇助・助長行為として定められた「不法就労助長罪」を適用せずに、無理やり刑法幇助罪を適用して、内容虚偽の雇用契約書の提供が在留資格の取得を容易にし、日本に在住できた。日本に在住できたので、不法就労できたとして、内容虚偽の雇用契約書の提供と不法就労罪との因果関係は明白であるとするが、特別法を無視し、幇助罪を乱用した判決です。

 

 こんな判決を許していれば、内容虚偽の雇用契約書の提供が在留資格の取得を容易にし、日本に在住できた。日本に在住できたので、殺人できたとして、殺人罪の因果関係は明白であるとするであろうが、恐ろしいことである。法の論理で許されない幇助罪の乱用であるのです。

 

 3.日本国は、実習生や研修生を除き、単純労働の外国人労働者は認めていません。しかし、日本国の国益に寄する専門能力をもった外国人労働者に対して、法務大臣は、学歴などを根拠に技術や人文国際の在留資格を与えて就労を許可しているので、日本におられたとしても在留資格内であれば就労できるもので、不法就労との因果関係はまったくありません。

 また、在留資格法務大臣が学歴など一定条件を満たす外国人に与えるものですが、日本への入国査証外務大臣が与えるものです。

 

 さらに、査証への証印は外国人に与えるものなので、国益等もありその基準は公開されていません。

 まして課長通達ごときで指示された書類が内容虚偽の雇用契約書だとしても、在留資格を容易にする法律的根拠のない書類で、風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる論法の因果関係で刑法幇助罪を適用するのは憲法31条の趣旨に反するものです。

 

 重用なことは、法の下での平等や国際法で定める、外国人を恣意的に差別しないように、不法就労した外国人を不法就労罪で処罰するならば、共謀した事業者を、不法就労に対する幇助や助長行為を含めた「不法就労助長罪」で処罰しなければなりません。

 

 不法就労の場合は、不法就労した者と不法就労させた者の関係で、ほう助や助長行為を明白に規定しているので、一般法である、刑法の幇助罪でなく、特別法である「不法就労助長罪」を適用しなければならないのは言うまでもありません。

 

 技術や人文国際で提出した書類で、卒業証書、日本人配偶者で戸籍謄本が、虚偽であるとか不実である場合は、法務大臣在留資格付与を与えた絶対条件であるので、自らの意志で、行政処分として在留資格を取消すものです。

 

 雇用契約書、決算書等は、課長通達等の指示により提出するものであり、内容虚偽だとして、刑事処罰するほどの法律的根拠は何もなく、まして日本におられるようにしたとの不当な因果関係で、入管法70条の不法就労に対する在留資格を容易にしたとするのは、まともな法の論理とはいえません。

 

 真の卒業証書や内容虚偽の雇用契約書、その他の書類を提出し、仮に在留資格を得たとしても、重用な技術や人文国際の付与条件が充足していたので法務大臣在留資格取得を付与したのです。 

 

 まして、付与した在留資格は、外国人個人に与えたものであり、資格内であれば、どこで働こうと自由であり、雇用契約書の提供者は外国人を拘束できないものです。

 

  仮に内容虚偽の雇用契約書をも提出して、技術や人文国際の在留資格を得たとしても、学歴の絶対条件を充足しているので、与えられた資格内で働くことは自由です。

 

 よって、入管法の細則規定による卒業資格等で、正当に技術や人文国際の在留資格を得たことと、不法就労とはまったく因果関係がありません。よって刑法幇助行為にすら適用できない。

 

.終わりに

 4.取調べで警察官は「一般論で認めろ」。

検察官は「私は偉いんです、認めれば罰金、認めなければ懲役刑」と言って自白を強要します。

 

 公判でも、検察官は、レフコ社への「キン」なる振込入金は、「金軍学」からだと断言します。

 中国人は、こうした金は現金が常識です。まして銀行振込で振り込み人名を「姓=ファミリーネーム」のみ行うことは、100%ないと断言します。

 中国人は常になのです。

 唯一の証人尋問でT氏は、取調べ調書をはっきり否定しますが、裁判官は、証人は怖がっていたとして採用しません。

 このようなことは事実関係では虚偽だと主張したいことは多数ありますが、私はこのようなことでなく、日本が国会で制定した法律のもとに統治されるように、罪刑法定主義だけを追及しているのです。

 

 ですから、あえて、深刻な国際問題となる、国際法違反や法令違反を追及し解明してください。

 

 くどいようですが、外国人の処遇を規定する入管法においては、憲法の下で、国会が承認した条約である国際法を順守することとは、国家の命題です。

 

 入管法は、例え、日本国民の就労の機会を奪う不法就労に対し、外国人を恣意的に処分しないように、働く資格のない外国人のなした不法就労に対して、外国人を同法の不法就労罪で、また、その直接的因果関係である働く資格のない、その外国人を雇用した事業者を、不法就労に対する、ほう助行為を含めた助長行為を処罰する特別法の「不法就労助長罪」で、平等に処分することは、一般法である、刑法の幇助罪の適用より優先されるものです。

 

 日本は、長年、国際法を順守する国会の立法趣旨に反して、

司法行政は独裁で、不法就労に対し、国際法に反して、不法就労させた事業者を不法就労助長罪で処罰せずに、外国人だけを恣意的に不法就労罪により罰金や懲役刑で処罰し、国外退去させてきたのです。

 

 今回の事件やフィリピン大使館事件では、更に飛躍し、不法な理由で第三者を刑法幇助罪で処分し、その犯罪行為はエスカレートしているのです。

 

 不法な処罰をするということは、不法な逮捕監禁を行っており、北朝鮮の不法な日本人拉致と同じ行為を続けているのです。

 

 このツケは、日本人拉致や従軍慰安婦よりも大きく、外国人犠牲者の数は甚大であす。

日本政府は、国際法を順守し、恣意的に処分した外国人に謝罪し、そして名誉回復と賠償を速やかに行わなければ、我が国の国際的信用は毀損され、後世に大きな代償を背負わせることになるのです。

 

 安倍首相は、国際社会にむけて、またG7を日本で開催するにあたり、年頭の国会挨拶でも、我が国は、法の下で統治され、基本的人権が守られ、国際法を順守する国だと自負するが、

 

 日本国こそ、一日も早く、法の下で統治され、基本的人権が守られ、国際法を順守する国にしなければならないのです。

 

        長野恭博