<Public mail> Please help me!
Dear Sir or Madam, UK Prime Minister Teliza May, February 2, 2018
NO 1:
In the Yomiuri Shimbun editorial, in the heading "Can you overcome the confrontation of the trump speech US Congress?"
Emphasizing results such as large tax cuts, deregulation, stock price increase, employment increase, etc., declared the arrival of a "new era of the United States". The support rate remains around 40% of the lowest postwar postwar level. It is no doubt that he emphasized the appeal of achievement with consciousness of the November middle election. The future focus is whether we can realize a huge investment in infrastructure development such as transportation network and maintain a strong economy.
The immediate task is to eliminate the gap over immigration policy. We will build a wall at the Mexican border in line with the government's commitment primarily. As a remedy for young people of illegal immigrants demanded by the Democratic Party, 1.8 million people will open a way to acquire citizenship. Mr. Trump brought up a reform plan on immigration that set these as a set in a speech.
Below, I agree. In order to encourage bipartisan consensus, should we reconsider the opposition forces by Twitter, and also reconsider the approach to assert its own validity unilaterally? I did not mention about reviewing to TPP! It is still unclear how much importance is placed on international cooperation. President Cardo thinks that it is necessary to rush to flesh out the Indo - Pacific strategy, including coping with China 's ocean advancement and military expansion.
How about discussing the immigrant refugee problem with the EU? For Britain 's withdrawal from the EU, President Trump should persuade Britain to remain in the EU.
NO 2:
In the Immigration Control Act, foreign nationals who suggested, assisted, or promoted the acquisition of a status of residence are completed by the administrative sanction of "deportation compulsion". For brokers, etc., when managing illegal workers under control or arranging for illegal workers, they are subject to criminal penalties under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act, "illegal employment promotion crime".
In this way, although the Diet legislates to clearly make immigration administration by administrative penalty of "cancellation of status of residence" and criminal disposition of "criminal promotion of illegal employment", police officers, prosecutors, and judges, I am committing the crime to mock up the Diet legislation.
If a special civil servant (policeman, prosecutor, judge) is not adhered to the business operator by "illegal employment promotion crime", if it is applied according to the legislative purpose of the Diet, illegal work can not be done and illegal workers will not occur .
If you can not do illegal work, you can not stay in Japan because there is no income, so there are no illegal residents.
That way, opportunities for Japanese workers will increase and wages will rise as well.
Continue to NO: 008. In case
NO 3:
Please support humanitarian crimes concerning treatment of immigrants and refugees by the Japanese state. Not only Japanese law but international law violation.
Not only me but a lot of foreigners such as Chinese and Filipinos are being sacrificed. Please save from 'humanitarian crime' by the Japanese government. Please submit the materials to be submitted to ICC as below.
Teliza May, Prime Minister Gambare. And please help us! Best regards.
Contact email
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
