Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump 2018-12-20: Mr. Carlos Ghosn's counsel is "2 pairs". American lawyers will get angry. As a Japanese lawyer is a former public prosecutor, he thinks he is normal in Japan. That's why a Japanese lawyer will "defend the judge". This


<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To President Trump


2018-12-20: Mr. Carlos Ghosn's counsel is "2 pairs".
American lawyers will get angry.
As a Japanese lawyer is a former public prosecutor, he thinks he is normal in Japan.
That's why a Japanese lawyer will "defend the judge".
This is not a trial. "stupid"


Dear sirs. It is the continuation of the previous day.
The Japanese judge is on the side of the prosecutor.
In the court, when the witness's "statement" becomes disadvantageous to the public prosecutor,
the judge "guides" the "statement" of the "witness" to be advantageous to the public prosecutor.
But in this trial, the witness "negates" the judge's "guidance".
This is the Japanese judicial system.
If you have any doubts about what I am writing, please look at actual judicial documents.
If you can not get it, I will give you a copy of the material I am managing.

I have said it many times.
This "judge" has not tried "under the law" trial.

You should be able to understand by reading the "indictment" submitted by the prosecutor.
The reason for the crime is Article 22-4-4 itself of Immigration Control Act.
The judge believes in the "law of application" written by the prosecutor.
(Crime to support other crimes of criminal law).
Why does not the judge read the immigration law?
Immigration law is a small law.
Even if you peruse it carefully,
you can understand it as "perfect" if it is several hours.
Understanding the Immigration Control Law,
if you read the "indictment",
you can understand immediately
that it is Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act that the crime "I write in reasons.

It is as written in the Immigration Act that the reason for the offense pointed out
by the prosecutor falls under the act of revoking the "qualification for residence"
of the foreigner.
So I will accept 100% of the prosecution written by the prosecutor.
Even if I approve 100% of the indictment, it will not be a crime.

That's why I do not want to dispute the prosecutor's evidence of "foolish" intention.
I do not want to be swayed by the "foolish logic" of prosecutors and judges.

Everyone in the world, if you can speak Japanese,
please see Japanese immigration law and "indictment".
Instantly you will notice errors in the applicable law.

Well then, I will post "Record of Stupid Judges" again.
The judge asks, "From the beginning you have been testified with stiff faces,
but is not it hard to testify in front of Mr. Nagano?"
Mr. Moriyama answers, "When I say my opinion,
there are things that are a little hard to say,
but I am going to say exactly the facts."
The judge asks, "Is it difficult to say anything other than opinions?"
Mr. Moriyama replies, "There is a part that makes this guess come in,
so it is hard to say that part."
The judge asks questions, can you say clearly the part other than 'guess'? "
Mr. Moriyama answers, "Yes", it can be said clearly.
Mr. Moriyama makes "remarks" to "clear".

Because it is such a trial, Mr. Carlos Ghosn's trial requires monitoring of the media.

The reason for my crime is a mistake in "applicable law", so writing is informative.
I am writing to let people around the world know the Japanese judicial system.

I will continue on next week.
I will continue until you understand.

As Japan like the EU,
do not divide the country into two with the problem of "foreign workers".
The flow of the world does not accept foreign workers into their own country.
If the labor force is insufficient, reduce exports and do not fight with America.
Stop making America the "food"!
This case is a violation of international law.
In each country "treaties ratified" take precedence over "laws of each country".
To "point out" a treaty violation is not "interference of domestic affairs".
The world should be ruled under the law.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The Japanese government is not entitled to claim "abduction of Japanese" by North Korea.
The Japanese government should "resolve" the "abduction of foreigners
by the Japanese government" incident as "top priority issue".

This e - mail is sent to the prime minister 's official every day like everyone.

Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************