Dear Sirs International people.
End of Year & New Year 's December 29, 2018:
ICC prosecutes and punishes responsible individuals for serious crimes
that are international concerns,
preventing similar crimes from repeating in the future. Why does ICC "ignore" Provision?
Dear sirs. Please "listen" to the summary of the ICC complaint.
This allegation is a petition for 'crime against humanity'.
For the purposes of this rule, "crimes against humanity"
As an attack on civilian population and as a part of wide or organizational,
Refers to any one of the following acts while recognizing such an attack.
(a) Murder
(b) act of extinction
(c) enslavement.
(d) Exile or forced transfer of residents
(e) significant deprivation of detention and other physical freedoms
in violation of the basic rules of international law
(f) torture
(g) rape, sexual slavery, compulsory prostitution, continuation of forced pregnancy,
forced separation and all other forms of sexual violence.
(h) Specific reasons based on political, racial, national, ethnic,
cultural or religious reasons, reasons relating to sex,
and reasons universally recognized as being unacceptable
under international law Persecution against a group or community.
(j) Mandatory disappearance of people
(j) apartheid crime
Other inhumane acts with other similar properties
that will deliberately give heavy distress to the physical or mental and physical health
or add serious injuries
We will cover (e) above as part of a broad or organizational one.
(e) significant deprivation of detention and other physical freedoms
in violation of the basic rules of international law
(E) applies to this case.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
I've "claimed" two things in this case.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished with Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, Japan's judiciary "disposses" only foreigners and does not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If "an employer who illegally employed" is innocent, "a foreigner who worked illegally" is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law" against
Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. "Prosecution letter" "as a reason for crime,
It points out the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act (Acquisition of status
of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no criminal penalty against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "crime to support other crimes of criminal law" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "support" a lot of victims with your courage and justice.
I am asking the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for victims" of the victims.
Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
