Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

#MeToo Human rights victim! To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-01-16: I handed "employment contract" to the Chinese. The Chinese updated the "status of residence" with this "employment contract" attached. The prosecutor points out "support"


<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-01-16: I handed "employment contract" to the Chinese.
The Chinese updated the "status of residence" with this "employment contract" attached.
The prosecutor points out "support" under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act,
"Submitting false documents and renewing your status of residence".
Punishment is "cancellation of status of residence".
The prosecutor applied me to Article 62 (1) of the Penal Code and Penal Code 60
against the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act of the Chinese.
This is Japanese judiciary.
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
It is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law! Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


Dear sirs. I will explain the facts and circumstances of illegal acts in chronological order.
We will explain all matters related to the evaluation and examination of a specific case.
I will explain the facts and circumstances considering "humanitarian crime"
(how the Japanese government infringes our human rights).

History of incident occurrence

"I (Nagano)" who is the president of Company L Inc.
issued a schedule (adoption) for employment to four Chinese who will be hiring regularly
(April 2009) by January 2009 .

However, the schedule for orders for "Lehman shock" that occurred
in autumn 2008 "drastically decreased". So in March 2009,
I canceled the schedule (adoption) of recruitment.
The Chinese who will be hiring has already finished "renewal of status of residence".

Previously, I heard from the Immigration Bureau and understood.
The status of residence is not to be issued to the company to be hired by Japan.
Since Japan is to be issued to foreign nationals,
even if "cancellation of recruitment" is done,
cancellation of the status of residence already issued can not be done.

Also, if "foreigners who obtained status of residence" is "the scope of status of residence",
they received "guidance" that "where they work" is their "freedom".

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners,
but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes
of criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp