<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-02-11: The international community tolerates China's human rights abuses.
The world is no longer governed under international treaties and laws.
The world can be governed only by war and terrorism. It's crazy!
Dear sirs. Article 31 of the Constitution stipulates that "no one can be deprived
of its life or liberty unless it is proceeded by law, and can not impose any other punishment."
(The provision of the law refers to the law established by the National Assembly.
Including the ordinance established by the local council).
According to the indictment, the Chinese violated Immigration Act 22-4-4
(get status of residence (in Japan) "by submitting false documents).
"I and Kingungaku" handed "contract documents of employment" to Chinese.
Prosecutors say that "I and Kingungaku" handed "contract documents of employment" to Chinese.
"False document" is "Contract of employment with false content".
The prosecutor knew that "I and Kingungaku" can not be punished
under the support act of article 22-4-4 of Immigration Act.
The prosecutor "creates" the "applicable law" against "support of Article 22-4-4
of Immigration Control Act".
The prosecutor applied "Article 60 and Article 62 of the Criminal Code" against "Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act."
It exceeds the logic of law.
"Offering documents of contracts of false content
of employment" to Chinese people made "acquisition" of "status of residence (in Japan)" easy ".
From this point, the logic to combine Article 70 of the Immigration Act and Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Act begins.
This logic thinks that "the jurist of the world" will "be amazed".
This is the same logic as Japan does war.
We can punish only by law. (Article 31 of the Constitution)
"Documents for employment contracts" submitted
by Chinese to immigration office are not documents stipulated by law.
Therefore, in fact, we clearly state "cancellation of status of residence (in Japan)"
under Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.
"Cancellation of status of residence" is done by the Minister of Justice at "discretion".
I will be persistent. This is not "criminal disposition".
Submission of "documents of employment contract" is not a ministerial order.
"Documents for contract of employment" is based on "Notice of Section Manager" of "Ministry of Justice".
We cooperated with "manager's notice" as "company planning recruitment".
Even if it is false, there is no legal basis to impose criminal penalties
on the case that the Minister of Justice gives at discretion.
The only thing is that the Minister of Justice can cancel the "status of residence"
as an administrative measure rather than a criminal disposition
by the Immigration Control Act as a countermeasure to that.
This mail is also sending the same mail to the "Prime Minister's Official Residence" in Japan,
"LDP" and "Politicians". They still do not have "justice" to rule Japan under the law.
"International people"!
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
God will always support 'justice'.
I certainly believe that justice is "wins".
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
