Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

#metoo Human rights victim! Dear Sirs International people. Sunday version, March 03, 2019: Does the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office know "police officers, prosecutors, judges" each job act "? It is not a crime to support Article 22-4-4 of

<Public mail> #metoo Human rights victim!


Dear Sirs International people.


Sunday version, March 03, 2019:
Does the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office know "police officers, prosecutors,
judges" each job act "? It is not a crime to support Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(cancellation of status of residence).
Acts supporting the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act are irrelevant to the act
of support of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The amendment of Immigration Control Act in July 2010 clearly pointed out.
Everyone, not just laugh at them, please move ICC.

Dear sirs. I think that my explanation has already been understood.
I have done all possible solutions in Japan.
We submitted "complaint letter"
and "accusation letter" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office many times.
Please refer to the "complaint letter" and "accusation letter" on the web.
We will publish the continuation of that part.
Reasons for not accepting are as follows.

Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office,
Special Investigative Division, No. 683
August 4, 2014
Yasuhiro Nagano
Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office
Special investigation team "Tokusyu Cyokoku" team

I saw a letter of five letters titled "a letter of complaint" sent from you.
July 14, 2014 as 1 Letters,
2 Letters dated July 22, 2014,
2 Letters dated July 28, 2014)
And "letter of complaint = a complaint" 1 Letters
(Dated July 14, 2014)
As mentioned in the previous survey,
in the above-mentioned documents, on the basis of what basis each job act such as investigation,
investigation, police officer involved in trial,
immigration inspector, immigration official, prosecutor,
judge, etc., why abuse of duties It is unclear what concrete contents such as the false charge
and the grounds to assert as false accusation.
It is not accepted that criminal facts subject to accusations
and accusations are specified specifically by merely listing claims not based on specific evidence.
Therefore, the document sent from you will be turned back.

In the future, if "similar document" has been sent to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office,
we will not handle it as a complaint or accusation stipulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure.
And, there are also cases where the sent documents etc. do not "return".
Thank you for your understanding.

Requirements of "letter of complaint" and "accusation letter" are completely "cleared".
I am e-mailing everyone to you everyday. I think everyone understands.

Please see the "complaint letter" and "accusation letter" on the web.
"Constituent external element of a crime" is stated.
I will provide "original" if requested.
Many people understand it.

The public prosecutor's office is not a court.
The citizen "provides" the "hint" "information" on which the crime was made to the "prosecution".
It is the work of "prosecutor" and "police officer" to conduct an investigation based on the "hint".
"IIC" requires "providing information".
Japan's judiciary calls for "report" by organizing "constituent external element of a crime".
For example, now people have been killed.
constituent external element of a crime is "such and such."
With this, the people can not "inform". It's crazy.
This is the actual situation of Japanese judiciary.

I will continue with next week.

Please understand Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act.
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Full text is below.
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1934&vm&re

This is the reason for the crime pointed out in the indictment
The prosecution says that we did "aiding and abetting" of Article 22-4-4 "Revocation
of Status of Residence" Immigration Act.
This punishment is the cancellation of "status of residence".

(Revocation of Status of Residence)
Article 22-4 A Minister of Justice may obtain a foreign national who resides
in Japan with the status of residence of the appended table 1
or the upper row of appended table 2 under the recognition of a refugee
under paragraph 1 of Article 61-2 ),
If any of the facts listed in each of the following items is found,
the applicant may revoke the status of residence that the alien actually has
under the procedure specified by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.

1 omitted
2 omission
3 omitted
※ ※ ※ ※
"A bill of indictment" is "posting" 4 below. It's crazy.
Documents submitted to the "Tokyo Immigration Bureau" by the Chinese people fall
under the following 4.
The prosecution "points out" that we have "offered" this document "false document" to Chinese people.

4 In addition to what is listed in the preceding three items,
documents containing misrepresented documents
(certificates and misrepresentations stipulated in Article 7-2, paragraph 1,
which was issued by submission or presentation of documents with misstatements
or drawings Including a visa received by a passport by submitting or presenting a certain document
or drawing of the same) or a seal or the like of landing permission
by submission or presentation of drawings.

5 omitted
(Forced deportation)
(Deportation)
Article 24 For a foreign national who falls under any of the following items,
it is possible to force the eviction from Japan by the procedure prescribed in the next chapter.

* The following was added in 2010 July.
(3) Invalidly illegally giving a certificate under the provisions of the preceding paragraph 1
or 2 illegally to another foreigner, a seal of the landing permit
(including the record under the provisions of Article 9 paragraph 4) or permission,
Forgery or alteration of documents or drawings, creation of false documents or drawings,
forgery or forgery or creation of documents
or drawings for the purpose of allowing permission
for landing pursuant to the provisions of the clause or permission
under the provisions of Section 1 or 3 of the next chapter A person who exercises,
possesses, or provides for altered documents or drawings or false documents or drawings,
or suggests or helps these acts

There is no "good abduction" or "bad abduction" in abduction / confinement. Help me!

There are many victims around the world.
Please support "Appeal to ICC".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

In case
The above translation documents are inaccurate,
so please contact us by e-mail.

Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp