Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister To President Trump 2019-03-20: The Korean government should rescue the victims of the current immigration case rather than pursue past human rights issues. There are te

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


To President Trump


2019-03-20: The Korean government should rescue the victims of the current immigration case rather
than pursue past human rights issues. There are tens of thousands of victims!
Korean government should demand Japan to recover the honor of Koreans illegally arrested
and compensate for damages! Korea media should report this!

Dear sirs. Those who have submitted false documents and obtained "qualifications
for residence" will be canceled "status of residence".
And "forced to leave" let me do. Since "Minister of Justice" gave it by "discretion",
"Minister of Justice" only cancels it by "discretion". It is not a sin.

Some foreigners living in Japan are subject to "landing permission" etc.
by "false" or other "fraudulent means".
Or, there are people doing "illegal work" or committing a crime without doing "activities that fall
under the status of residence".
There are a number of things that "hinder" fair "immigration control" by them.
For these reasons, the following was "founded" in order to "cope" with "precisely"
in "acts that promote illegal employment".
In "Partial revision" of the Immigration Control Act in 2004, a system of "cancellation
of the status of residence" under Article 22-4 of the Immigration Act was "established".
(Enforced on December 2, the same year).
The legal basis is the cancellation of the status of residence of Article 22-4 of Immigration Control Act.

When the Minister of Justice finds any of the facts listed in each of the following items,
he / she can rescind the status of residence currently residing in a foreigner.
① In case of misjudging the immigration inspector's judgment on the reason for refusal
of landing due to fraudulent or other illegal means and receiving a seal of landing permission etc.
In case
② In case of lying false or other improper means to falsify the activities to be done
in Japan and receiving a seal of landing permission etc. For example,
a case where a person who intends to conduct simple labor in Japan declares
that he / she will perform an activity that falls under the status of residence
of "technology" will be subject to cancellation under this issue. In case
③ When the applicant falsifies facts other than the activities that the applicant intends to do
in Japan and receives a seal of landing permission etc.
For example, the case where the applicant falsely owns his / her background is subject to cancellation
under this issue. In case
④ In cases other than those falling under (1) to (3),
in case of submitting false documents and receiving a seal etc.
of landing permission. In this issue,
it is not a requirement that a false or other unauthorized means is used,
and the applicant is intentional. It is not necessary. In case
⑤ If you have not continued activities related to the status
of residence you currently have (the status of residence (limited to the status of residence (Note)
in the upper column of Appended Table 1 of the Immigration Act No. 1)
for more than 3 months (provided, however,
that you stay without doing such activities There is a justifiable reason for being in.) Except.
Also, in canceling the status of residence, it is supposed to hear opinions
from alien subjects in advance.

Paragraph 4, paragraph 4, item 4, is fake document submission.
Note: A false document is now changed to a misrepresentation document.

As of 2014 it has become the following expression
Omit

It will continue to next week.
I will continue until you understand.

Please "condemn" the crazy 'logic of law' of Japanese judiciary, everyone in the world.
Everyone, please take up this problem at "G20" or "UN Human Rights Council".

This mail is also sending the same mail to the "Prime Minister's Official Residence" in Japan,
"LDP" and "Politicians". They still do not have "justice" to rule Japan under the law.
"International people"!
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom, democracy and human rights are protected.

I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. It is "crazy" that the prosecution "applies" criminal law Article 62 "crime to support other crimes"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
for reasons of support under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of law is out of order.

Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
However, there is no causal relation with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
At all, the logic of law is out of order.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp