To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-05-16:Dear Sirs, I think the Democratic Party's "Green New Deal Bill" is wonderful.
But it is not realistic. I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition
of "coal power generation" with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.
Part 1. February 7, 2019. Democrat Alexander Ocasio Cortes
and Senator Ed Marquee have announced a "Green New Deal Bill" that plans to reverse climate change
within 10 years and eliminate all US carbon emissions.
Already, strong opposition has been raised not only from the Republican Party,
but also from industry and the Democratic Party as a reckless plan that can not be achieved.
Outline of the Green New Deal bill.
Aim to shift carbon emissions from fossil fuels to 100% renewable energy within 10 years.
Launch 14 infrastructures and large industrial projects to realize the project.
And "eliminate" emissions of "greenhouse gases" from all sectors of the economy.
Problems are also pointed out.
(1) There are no concrete measures to abolish fossil fuels and no cost calculation
for conversion to renewable energy.
(2) A portion of the cost will be borne by the carbon tax and the people.
Specifically, the marginal tax rate of income tax for people
with income of over $ 10 million is raised to 70%.
The main investment funds will be borrowed from the newly established New Green Bank's central bank,
but direct lending by such central banks is unprecedented.
(4) The conversion to renewable energy will create 10 million new jobs,
but does not consider the loss of employment related to the fossil fuel economy.
5 The schedule for "modification" of the energy industry is not indicated.
The US energy consumption ratio for 2017 is 37% oil, 29% natural gas, and 14% coal.
Fossil fuel accounts for 80% of the total.
Even in Germany, it aims to abolish the current 40% coal ratio by 2038,
and by 2030 the abolition of 80% fossil fuel thermal power is a non-viable plan.
Even "the bill proponent" Cortez himself admits that it is impossible to achieve with investments
from 585 "millionaires" (a wealthy person with over $ 1 billion in wealth) and businesses across the US .
Achieving an energy ratio of 80% within 10 years is only a dream.
I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of "coal power generation"
with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.
Revenues from “carbon duty” on imported goods should be used to subsidize “renewable energy”
in importing countries.
Everyone, please consider.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
