Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.2019-05-21:Dear Sirs, Why does the Philippine government not protest the Japanese government

To President Trump


At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-05-21:Dear Sirs, Why does the Philippine government not protest the Japanese government
for the "Immigration Act violation case" that occurred at the Philippine Embassy
in Japan in 2013-2014? Embassy officials and diplomats are "innocent."
I have sent letters and emails many times.
We also send emails daily to the Philippine media!


Part 1. There are two types of this case.
Embassy officials and diplomats give "employment agreement" to the Philippine people
for employment as their driver.
So the Philippines got a "specific visa".
But they worked in the "Landscaping shop" without working as their driver.
So they were arrested for violation of section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act
(a crime of earning income by working outside the scope of the status of residence).
Employers who have hired unqualified Philippines have not been arrested.
I insist that they are "Not guilty" like Chinese.

The reason is the same as the previous day's Chinese.

The embassy staff and diplomats
who have handed over the Employment Contract to the Philippines are not guilty.
They gave the Philippine driver a "false employment contract".
So they were punished.
The name of the crime is the criminal code 69 & 62 "sin of aiding"
for violation of the Immigration Control Act 70 (4).
This is a violation of the "applicable law".
Suppose that they recognize 100% of the "charged fact" of "bill of indictment."
It states that the reason for the crime is described in Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Act.

Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien resident in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of an attached Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2, paragraph (1)),
the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status of residence
in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance.

(iv) Inclusion to the cases listed in the precedent three items,
the alien has received,
by subscribing or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including the certificate to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
paragraph (1), acquired by submitting or presenting a document or drawing
that contains a false entry and a visa acquired for the passport
by subscribing or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry)
or a drawing that contains a false negative action .

A Filipino driver who has submitted a "contract document of false employment"
and obtained "status of residence" will be canceled as "status of residence"
and become "Deportation".
This is an order by the Minister of Justice. It is not a punishment.

Therefore, the "aiding" of Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Act is "innocent."
However, the “Revision, Immigration Control Act”,
which was constructed from July 1, 2010, is as follows.
Foreigners who have conducted "aiding"
under Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Control Act will receive "administrative sanctions"
from the Minister of Justice in the same way as violators under Article 22-4 (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
They are the cancellation of the status of residence and the deportation.

What is the Philippine government doing? It's crazy.
The Philippine government should protest the Japanese government
and demand their "recovery of honor" and reparations.

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************

 

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

 


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************