Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump 2019-06-04:Dear Sirs, The Philippine embassy case did not occur suddenly. That is too "crazy". At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in vio


To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-04:Dear Sirs, The Philippine embassy case did not occur suddenly.
That is too "crazy".


Part 1. The judge says in the "judgment".
The following scenario is the reason for assistance to Article 70 of my immigration law.
1) I issued a "content lie fake employment contract" stipulated
in Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) to Chinese.
2) Chinese were easily obtained status of residence.
3) Chinese were able to stay in Japan.
4) Chinese were able to do illegal work because they were able to stay in Japan.
5) Therefore I say that I "helped" "illegal employment" of Chinese.
6) Judges therefore say that the following law applies to Article 70
of the Immigration Act "illegal labor outside of qualification".
That is "Sin that supported other crimes" under Article 62 of the Penal Code.
This is the "skill" of a Japanese judge.
That is too "crazy".

It is just the "forced logic" of the conclusion that "If the wind blows,
the" bucket maker "will make a profit." Such logic is only in Japan. The meaning is crazy.

This Filippin embassy Immigration Act false lie case was completely the same
as the "assistance case" of my "Immigration Act violation"
that received "a prison sentence" in 2010.

The police and prosecutors' "motives" in my case would be:
Since my company was "Preparing to release shares", the capital was over 160 million yen.
"Capital stock" was a "big company",
so "it took" neck "of the president of a big company! ", They did it.

We are deprived of life and physical freedom only
by the law enacted in the Japanese Diet under Article 31 of the Constitution.
In this case, I received "infringement" of "basic human rights"
by police officers, prosecutors and judges.

Prime Minister Abe has called for "government or its representative" to "govern
under the law," but in Japan today, there is no governance under the law.
It is Japan that needs governance under the law.

This can be evidenced by the fact that all the police officers,
prosecutors and judges involved in the case have committed crimes.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation abroad"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore,
"Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************

 

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

 


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************