Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "repa

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims.
If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines,
the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of illegal labor related immigration laws.
(1) It is the "sin" of a foreigner who has illegal labor.
"Sins of unlawful labor" of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be sentenced to imprisonment
or imprisonment of 3 years or less or a fine of 3 million yen or less,
or both the imprisonment or contraindication and a fine together.

1) A person who has entered Japan in violation of the provisions of Article 3
2) Those who landed in Japan without receiving permission from the immigration inspector
3) Those who have been canceled from the status of residence under the provisions
of Article 22-4, paragraph 1 (limited to items pertaining to item 1 or item 2) in Japan
Person who received designation of period by rule of 2 of Article 2 4 of Article 22 4
(including the cases where it applies mutatis mutandis
in Article 2 of paragraph 2 of 2 of Article 61); What remains in
(Illegal work by non-qualifying activities)
4) Activities that "does" only activities that run businesses with income
or activities that receive "remuneration" in violation of the provisions
of Article 19, paragraph 1

(2) It is a punishment of a person who illegally hires a foreigner.
Immigration Act Article 73-2 "illegal employment promotion crime"
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be liable to imprisonment
of up to three years or a fine of up to 3 million yen, or both.

(1) A person who has made foreign workers illegally work in business activities
(Ii) A person who has put it under his control
in order to cause foreigners to carry out illegal work activities
A person who holds an act of causing foreigners to engage in illegal work activities
or an act of the preceding item
«Revision» Flat 16 Law 073
・ "Don't delete 1 item" Flat 21 method 079
Persons who have conducted an act that falls under each item
of the preceding paragraph can not escape punishment under the provisions
of the same paragraph because they do not know that they fall under any of the following items.
But it is not this limit when there is no fault.
(I) The activity of the said foreigner is an activity to operate a business
with income that does not belong to the activity according to the status
of residence of the foreigner, or an activity that receives a reward.
(Ii) The foreigner has not obtained the permission under Article 19 paragraph 2
in performing the activities of the foreigner.
Iii The relevant foreigner shall be from Article 70, paragraph 1,
item 1 to item 2, item 3, item 5, item 7 to item 7 or item 7 to item 7,
item 2 to item 8 to item 4. Being "a person to raise"

(3) In the "basic", we are moving foreigners to their home countries.
Because it has been examined and entered in accordance with the provisions
of the Immigration Control Act, if it violates, it is only "to leave the country."
However, it is against international law if arbitrary "forced eviction" is carried out,
so Japan's position will decline in the international community,
so we need to be careful.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************

 

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

 


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************