<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To President Trump
At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence
from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'.
He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work"
at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
Part 1. It is a "husband" of a Chinese female employee of "L company".
Her "husband" is scheduled to graduate from "Master's program
at Graduate School of Engineering at Chiba University"
and has decided to join "F Bank Computer Service".
Her "husband" submits the "Change of Status of Residence" to "Immigration"
with the "Employment Contract Documents" created by "F Bank Computer Service" attached.
Her "husband" has no desire to "join" F Bank Computer Service.
From "F Bank Computer Service", "year-end present" will reach her "husband".
A colleague's female employee blames her wife.
Your "husband" should immediately say "Decline"
of "joining" to "F Bank Computer Service"! "I rebuke" her.
But she just says, "No problem at all."
If you graduate in March, you will receive a "Visa".
So, finally he sends "Decline" to "F Bank Computer Service".
He "joins" a Chinese-owned company.
The job is "salesmanship".
I am an employee of L company.
He has renewed the "Certificate of Residence" of "Technology".
And on the third day I will not come to the company saying "I will retire".
As a matter of course, the manager
of the administration department asks the immigration authorities to cancel the status
of residence.
However, immigration does not accept protests.
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
