To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-06-25:Dear Sirs, Imitation marriage is increasing as ever.
Most of the fake marriage and female exchange students are working in "Sex industry".
The politicians admit their illegal conduct with tacit consent.
They seem to need a comfort woman for any era.
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
Part 1. Japanese spouse visas are said to be universal visas.
If it is a true Japanese spouse,
the Japanese husband should be against his wife working in "Sex industry".
I think that "regulating not to work" will not be a big "human rights issue".
If so, the Immigration Control Act should set the status
of residence to “Japanese spouse”
and “Study Abroad” as “law” that prohibits working in “Sex industry”.
If they can not work in "high income Sex Industry",
they do not have any meaning to live in Japan until they make a fake marriage,
so they almost disappear.
It is a big human rights violation
that it is a bigger human rights violation to inspect even "semen" attached to "sheets"
for "authentic verification" of camouflage marriage.
Originally, the definition of marriage can not be decided clearly.
The reason for divorce in a trial is when it is not "the state of marriage."
If "False Entries in the Original of Notarized Deeds" becomes "Prescription"
and the judiciary can not "punish",
it will be treated under the Immigration Act.
Be careful when switching visas from “Japanese spouse” to “permanent residence”.
Here too, we use the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 "Cancellation of Status of Residence".
If you submit a "fake false document", it will be "deported".
In order to do that, we conduct a "fact investigation".
This is the reason why we submitted "Family Register,
which describes misrepresentation" even though it is not "the state of marriage."
I think that it is the reason that "the false false documents"
of Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Act became "incorrect documents".
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship
with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.