Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Opinion from Japanese To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-07-09:This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law. White House staff still do not understand.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-07-09:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".
The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application
of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.
Please see "PDF of Indictment Letter".
This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law.
White House staff still do not understand.
The US government should help the victims of the "American".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "letter of indictment" at the following site.
In this case, it is possible to understand "error of applicable law" only by "indictment letter of indictment".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.

● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. We have not violated the law established in the Japanese parliament.
The actions taken by police officers
and prosecutors are Article 172 of the Penal Code "Crimes of false accusation".
And because they did "illegal arrest and imprisonment",
they are Article 194 "Crimes of abuse of authority by special public officer" of criminal law.

In addition, because the judge made an "unfair" trial,
which ordered "arrest and imprisonment" illegally,
it is the criminal law Article 194 "a crime that a special public employee abused his authority".

It is not necessary to prove "Deliberately" as "Crime composition requirements"
under Article 194 of the Penal Code. (This is an example of the Supreme Court ruling).
It is natural.
There is no reason why the judiciary did not know the law.

I was arrested in 2010 for assistance in violation of the Immigration Control Act,
and in April 2011, I was sentenced to one and a half years of "a punishment for labor"
and a fine of 1 million yen by the Tokyo District Court.
I "appealed" to the Supreme Court.
The court is not a "constitutional violation".
It merely asserts that "application law error".
Therefore, the Supreme Court's "Not a matter to be discussed"
under the "Criminal Procedure Code".
And "rejected" for the reason.
I was imprisoned and was released from jail on March 19, 2013 at "Maturity".

Under the Code of Criminal Procedure,
"claims for retrial" are not permitted for reasons of "error in applicable law".
However, if there is a "criminal fact" of a police officer or a public prosecutor,
you can "request for a retrial."
After being released from prison,
I filed a "criminal complaint" with the "Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"
from around May 2014 to the beginning of August.

I did "indictment" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office about "Chinese".
The Chinese "kinGungaku"
who is considered as accomplice is a "victim" due to the same "violation
of applicable law" as "I".
The four Chinese who have been punished under Article 70
of the Immigration Act "illegal employment due to unqualified activities" are not guilty.
The reason is that the employer has not been "punished"
for immigration control law Article 73-2 "Sin for promoting illegal work".
Therefore it violates international law and violates equality under the law.

The prosecution still "does not admit" the violation of the applicable law.
We need the support of the international community.
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp