Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

SOSオピニオン To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-09-05: Dear Sir,So I say, “You should accept your crime with generality”.

To President Trump


2019-09-10: Dear Sir,
The Philippine government should ask the Japanese government for "recovery of honor"
and "compensation" for the people.

A violation of the immigration law of the Japanese government.
From 2014 to 2015, the staff of the Embassy of the Philippines are victims.
Judges must be punished by the constitution and the law according to the provisions
of the constitution. Japan has ratified human rights treaties.


Part 1. This case is a crime in which a “special public officer” punishes
only the Philippine people without “criminal punishment”
for employers who illegally hired Philippine people who are not eligible to work.
The reason is probably “perform great deed”.
This case is very similar to the “Impairment Violation Case”
in 2010 when I and the Chinese were damaged.

The truth is "administrative disposition of deportation".
The reason for the crime of “bill of indictment” points to violations
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Cancellation of visa status,” and support activities.
Japanese “special public servants” are “qualities”
that even the logic of the law cannot be understood.

This incident occurred due to the “success” of “crime”
in “support case” of violation of immigration law (unqualified labor)
in 2010 when “Chinese and I” became victims We are

I think there is a lot of damage besides the Embassy of the Philippines.
I think that “the incident at the Embassy of the Philippines” is already “the tip of the iceberg”.

The damage is spreading every day, so if you do not deal with it as soon as possible,
it will be a serious situation where victims spread all over the world.
The Immigration Act primarily treats and punishes foreigners,
so be serious about the damage that is international.

The following “special public servants” are considered to fall
under the provisions of the Penal Code 172 “Crimes of False accusation”
and the Penal Code 194 “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
So I “accuse” the “special civil servant” asking for “strict punishment”.

The Philippine government should insist on violation of international law
by the Japanese government.
The Philippine government should demand “recovery of honor” and “compensation”
for the “Philippines”.
I sent the materials to the Philippine Embassy and explained them.
At that time, Philippine Embassy staff "to crush" my materials.
I'm sure it was "fallen" in the honey trap of the Japanese government.
If President Rodrigo Roa Duterte knows the truth, he will not forgive them.
The Philippine government should act before the Phillipines speak out throughout the Philippines.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

 

My information ********

 

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

 


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********