Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

SOSオピニオン To President Trump 2019-09-18: Dear Sir, Explain to the "Advisor Lawyer" of the "Former Democratic Party".

To President Trump


2019-09-18: Dear Sir,
Explain to the "Advisor Lawyer" of the "Former Democratic Party".
I explain, “The reason for the bill of indictment's crime is to claim Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act, but this is not a crime.”
However, he showed Article 64 of the Penal Code,
and “The principal offender is imprisonment, so Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code are“ consisting ”.
He can't answer. Please understand the skills of Japanese lawyers.
Everyone in the world! Please help!


Part 1. “Criminal facts” in Article 172 “Crimes of False Complaints”
by the “Police Officers”.
Around June 2004. Filipinos were working in “non-qualified activities”
at “landscaping companies” in Tokyo.

Police officers will not arrest “employers” who hired the Philippines illegally
for “Depending on emotion” on immigration 73-2 “Since promoting illegal employment”.

However, police officers arrested
only Filipinos for immigration law Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.

Police officers who wanted "big achievements" illegally abused their authority.
"Illegal labor" due to "out-of-qualification activities" is an incident that occurs every day.
Many are sent to “immigration facilities”. And “forced repatriation”.
They made a “special response” to Filipinos who violated the Immigration Act Article 70.
It was "planned" to strictly imprisonment in Article 70 "Unqualified Activities"
of the Immigration Control Act.
To this end, in order not to violate international law,
an employer who is a supporter of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act must be punished by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
“A Crime Promoting Unlawful Employment”.
However, because they do not want to punish employers
for “Depending on emotion”, they have made “Third Party” a “Supporter”.

“Third party” is a “supporter” of “Cancellation of status of residence”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act,
but police officers pretend “the name of sin”.
As a "supporter" of Article 70 "Unqualified Activities"
of the Immigration Control Act, he was a criminal with a "lie false name".
“Third Party” is the Philippine Embassy staff (driver) or diplomat.

“Falsified content” has changed “supporter”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act,
which is not a crime, to “supporter” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

1) The Filipinos received "provided" from the embassy staff (driver)
of "documents of false employment contracts".
2) Therefore, the Philippine people were able to obtain “resident status”.
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) Since the Philippine people were able to stay in Japan,
they were able to do “illegal labor”.

In such a scenario, he was designated as a “supporter”
for Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Control Act.

The embassy staff (driver) was subsequently arrested
and "sent to prosecutors" as "supporter" in Article 70 "Unqualified Activities"
of the Immigration Control Act.
Crime name is Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.

The general public and foreigners abuse the fact that they do not understand the law.

The act of support in the Immigration Act 22-4- (4), which is not guilty,
has been replaced with “Sin of Support” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

Much of the work of Japanese lawyers is "civil lawsuits".
There are only a few lawyers who understand immigration law in Japan.
So I think that the “Advisor Lawyer” at the Embassy
of the Philippines does not know the immigration law.

Defending without investigating the law is a violation of attorney law.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ********

 

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

 


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********