To President Trump
2019-10-16: Dear Sir,
In case of violation of immigration law, many judges in Tokyo District Court and Tokyo High Court have violated the law. Article 76 of the Constitution states that "Judges are bound only by this constitution and the law". Judges who commit illegal "actions" must be punished. If a judge seems to be running away, it cannot be said that the country is “governed under the law”.
Part 1. It is described in “double”.
The Constitution of Japan, Article 76. Article 76.
All jurisdiction belongs to the Supreme Court and lower courts established by law.
Article 76.The whole judicial power is vested in a Supreme Court
and in such inferior courts as are established by law.
Special courts cannot establish this.
The administrative body cannot make a trial as a final judgment.
No extraordinary tribunal shall be established,
nor shall any organ or agency of the Executive be given final judicial power.
All judges shall exercise their authority independently
in accordance with their conscience and are bound only by this constitution and law.
All judges shall be independent in the exercise of their conscience and shall be bound
only by this Constitution and the laws.
Japan is ranked 4th in the world for “acceptance of immigrants”.
You can see this from the OECD 2015 material.
It is 390,000 in 2015. In 5 years, 120,000 people have increased.
Top 10 in 2015 are: (1) Germany (about 2016,000) (2) United States (about 1051,000)
(3) United Kingdom (479,000) (4) Japan (about 391,000) Thousand people)
As of the end of June last year, the number of foreigners residing in Japan is 2,637,251.
According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications,
the total population of Japan as of July 1, last year was approximately 12,659,000,
and the number of foreign residents in Japan is about 2%.
The number of “permanent residents” is 759,139.
There are 326,190 “special permanent residents”.
“Study Abroad” has 324,245 people.
“Technical training” is 285,776 people.
By nationality and region, China had the largest number of 741,656,
accounting for nearly 30% of the total.
South Korea followed by 452,701, Vietnam by 291491, the Philippines by 266803, Brazil by ...
The case at the Embassy of the Philippines is exactly the same as the 2010 violation
of immigration law (non-qualified activities). Four Chinese have been imprisoned
for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
A Chinese and I were sentenced to 1 year and 6 months of "working punishment"
under Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code and a fine of 500,000 yen.
Police said (Misesime) "public flogging".
Chinese and Philippine people were “bigly reported”.
If you look at the numbers above, you can see that they are “arbitrary”.
In this situation, the number of victims will increase.
I think the responsibility of the Chinese government
and the Philippines government is also great.
In order to eliminate the victims,
the Chinese and Philippine governments should ask the Japanese government to restore
the victim's honor and compensate.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
