Dear Sirs, I am Japanese.
"Reason for crime" written in the "indictment" is not "act of supporting foreign illegal labor"
stipulated in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act, "Crime for promoting illegal employment" .
It is the continuation of the previous day.
In case
Democratic Party "City Council Member" introduced Democratic Party's "Consulting Lawyers."
The lawyer says that the "application" of "sin assistance crime to support" is "right"
because the Chinese who did "illegal labor" are "sentence of prison sentence" as "crime
of illegal labor".
This is not an answer. It merely states "application standard" of "Assistance crime"
of "criminal law".
"Assistance crime" does not apply when "the accused is sentenced to a fine".
"Reason for crime" written in the "indictment" is not "Assistance crime" stipulated
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act as stipulated in "Crime that promotes illegal employment".
Illegal employment has nothing to do with the fact
that the Chinese did an act to become "cancellation of status of residence"
under Immigration Act 24-4-4. A person who provided the Chinese
with "false contract of employment" is "Assistance crime"
under Article 24-4-4 "Revocation of Status of Residence".
I filed a prosecution document in advance with a lawyer.
It is not "Assistance crime" of "illegal work".
This "Crime reason" is not a crime. Lawyers can not understand this.
1. The first half of the "prosecution document" is stating the fact
that the Chinese violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act illegal labor outside the status
of residence ".
2. The latter part of "prosecution document" states
that I and kingungaku did "Assistance crime" for "submitting false documents"
under Article 24-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.
In other words, I and kingungaku handed out "contract documents of false content
of employment" to the Chinese.
And the fact that the Chinese applied for "change of status of residence" to
Tokyo immigration office with the false documents is stated.
However, the "application law" of the prosecutor is "Assistance crime" of "criminal law"
against Article 70 of Immigration Control Act.
This is a violation of the "applicable law".
The lawyer can not state this reason.
According to "logic of law",
the provisions of Article 24-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act are "prioritized",
so "Assistance crime" of the general law "Criminal law" should not be applicable.
"Assistance crime" under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
and "Assistance crime" under Article 24-4-4 of Immigration Control Act are completely different.
This is the skill of a Japanese lawyer.
I will continue tomorrow until you understand.
Ignoring the rule under the law Can the Japanese government be an alliance? Is not it betrayal?
President Donald Trump 's reply encourages me.
President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our American people
and their willingness to stay informed and get involved.
President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Sincerely yours,
Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Contact email
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
