<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-01-14: The Chinese were punished
by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Activities outside the status of residence".
However, employers hiring them will not be punished
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins to Support Illegal Labor".
The prosecutor is punishing consciously foreigners, so it is a violation of international law.
The employed Chinese are innocent. Everyone who can understand the law!
Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?
Dear sirs. Prosecutors and judges said
that "providing" a "false employment contract" made it easy to acquire "status of residence".
Then, we apply the "crime of support" of Article 62 (1) of the Penal Code,
Penal Code 60 "against the Immigration Act Article 70" Illegal Labor ".
This is said that "causal relation" is obvious. But this is "logic" which "insults" the law.
Their claim is "ignorance" itself.
Although it is said that "Residence qualification" was acquired "easily",
the "conditions of grant" of "status of residence" is not stipulated by law.
"Conditions of grant" is unpublished and the Minister of Justice "grants" at "discretion".
Therefore, it can not be said that the "status of residence" was made "easy".
Even if you obtain "status of residence" in the "Contents false employment contract",
the disposition is as stipulated in "Immigration Law 22-4-4" Rescission of Status of Residence ".
"Provision" of "Contents of False Employment Contract" is as prescribed
in "Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act" and is separate
from "Immigration Act Article 70" illegal employment ".
Judicial officials in Japan should read their laws with Japanese language skills.
Suppose that you obtained the "status of residence" of "Technical and Humanities International"
by the Minister of Justice on "False Employment Contract".
However, it is obvious that if you work within the scope of "status of residence"
of "Technology and Humanities International" it will not be "illegal work
(activities outside the status of qualification)" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Therefore, "acquisition of status of residence" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
and the "illegal work outside the status of qualification"
in Article 70 of the Immigration Act are not related at all.
It is clear that it is the responsibility of the employer who hired foreigners
who are not eligible to work that they became "illegal workers".
Prosecutors and judges should understand the purpose of legislation of Immigration Control Act.
Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal relationships" of illegal work
with the Immigration Act 73-2 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners,
but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.
sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
Please contact us if you have any questions.