Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump 2019-01-17: Prosecutors impersonate the applicable law on the grounds of immigration law 22-4-4 "If you obtain false documents by obtaining false documents, you will cancel this status of residence". I will apply "Criminal law Arti


<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To President Trump


2019-01-17: Prosecutors impersonate the applicable law
on the grounds of immigration law 22-4-4 "If you obtain false documents
by obtaining false documents, you will cancel this status of residence".
I will apply "Criminal law Article 62 (1), criminal law 60" to "support" of immigration law 22-4-4.
However, "Penal Code Article 62 (1),
Penal Code 60" can not be applied to administrative punishment "withdrawal of status of residence".
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
It is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law!
Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


Dear sirs. Even after graduating from college,
the four Chinese who failed to get a job at L company continued working
at a restaurant that worked part-time in school days.
So they were arrested in May to June 2010,
"Illegal employment due to activities outside the status of residence",
Article 70-4 of the Immigration Act.

However,
employers of eating and drinking establishments hiring Chinese people are not arrested
under Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73 (a crime that promotes illegal labor).
Employers have not received any disposition.
In case
Looking at "record of interrogation",
employers who hired Chinese people "stated" they neglected to confirm
that the Chinese were "qualified to work".

I and "Kin Gungaku" which is "the Chinese who took charge
of" Chinese recruitment "do not do the act prescribed in" Immigration law 73-2 clause ".

But the prosecutor says like this.
We offered "Contract documents for false content of employment" to "Chinese who will be recruited".
Therefore, the Chinese easily obtained "qualification of stay" of "technology"
or "humanities international".
The Chinese were able to live in Japan because "staying resident qualification" was obtained.
Because the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to do "illegal labor".

Therefore, "causal relationship" between 'act of providing contract document
of false content of employment' and 'illegal work' is obvious.
Therefore, in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
"Article 60 of the Criminal Code," Crime of Assistance "
of Article 62 of the Criminal Code was applied due to the Immigration Act 22-4-4.
We were arrested in June 2010 and charged in July.

In April 2011, I received a ruling from the Tokyo District Court for "one
and a half years of labor and a fine of 1 million yen".
I appealed to the High Court but was rejected in October 2011.
Although I appealed to the Supreme Court,
"Appeal due to misappropriation of application law is not subject to deliberation pursuant
to the provisions of the" Code of Criminal Procedure "was rejected in February 2012.
And I was imprisoned in Tokyo detention center in March 2012.
And in April 2012 I was imprisoned in a prison in Tochigi prefecture.
And, in March 2013, I was "released" after "the sentence of labor" ended.

I lost all my wealth and credit.
The battle for recovery of my honor and reparation began.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.


I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes
of criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano

 

My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************