Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

#MeToo Human rights victim! To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1,

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister

2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists
on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1,
criminal law 60" against "support" of Immigration Act 22-4-4 as "reason for crime".
However, "offense" applies "Article 62 (1) of the Penal Code,
Criminal Code 60" to the Immigration Act 70 "Extracurricular Activities".
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
This is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law! Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?

Dear sirs. "Kin Gungaku" who was considered "accomplice" was the same "punishment" as I was,
but because he admitted his sin,
he became "suspended execution" instead of "punishment for actual labor".
He was "forcibly repatriated" to China at the end of October 2010.
Four Chinese had become "sentence of labor one and a half" and "fine for punishment"
by around August 2010.
They are "deported" to China in "suspended execution".
In case
I and 4 Chinese people and Chinese Kin Gungaku are not protected
by the Constitution of Japan.

Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan (Equality under the Law) Paragraph 1.
"All citizens are equal under the law and are not discriminated against in political,
economic or social relations by race, creed, gender, social status or entrance."

Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan.
"No one shall be deprived of its life
or liberty unless it is in accordance with the procedures prescribed by law,
and no other punishment can be imposed."
"Procedure prescribed by law" refers to the law legislated in the Diet.

It is clearly contrary to "International Covenant
on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan. It is the following article.
Article 2 (1) (3), Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13,
Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17, Article
Article 26,

We have not committed any crime.
This is "False charges".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
Because the Japanese government will not accept it,
"condemnation" of the international community is necessary.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on next week.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano

It is open to the program below.

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.