<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan
and the law under the Constitution.
"Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid.
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?
Dear sirs. In the Japanese judicial system, there is a "retrial request system",
but "Error in applied law" can not claim.
However, if a crime such as a police officer who "participates" in the incident is confirmed,
you can request a retrial.
Crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges is obvious.
Despite being not a crime they are "arresting and detaining" us.
It is "a crime that a special civil servant abused" authority of duties ".
Despite being not a crime,
they "complained" by "false reasons" so it is "crime of false complaint" of criminal law.
"Intentional" is unnecessary as the reason for constituting the crime
of "crimes of special public servants abusing their authority".
(According to the judicial precedent of the Supreme Court).
So I submitted "indictment" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office
and the Metropolitan Police Department.
Those for Chinese and Philippine people submitted "accusation letters".
However, although I submitted them many times, they "did not accept".
The reason is "Crime is not clear". (See the document on the site)
Since Japan has given prosecutors "monopoly right of indictment",
we can not trial as a criminal case unless the prosecution accepts "indictment" or "accusation letter".
Prosecutors receive "indictment" and "letter of accusation",
and "case" where this is "non-prosecution" has a method of forced prosecution.
It is possible by requesting a "review request" to the "prosecution review board" of the court.
However, the prosecution will not receive 'indictment letter' or 'accusation letter'.
With this, the method of last relief was "exhausted".
I requested a review for the "Tokyo Prosecution Review Board" at "Preparedness to be rejected",
but it was rejected.
The reason is not treated as "Non-prosecution".
Because this case is "force majeure" by the state by the exercise of power,
I think that "statute of limitations runs out is stopping".
It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
The prosecution still ignores it.
It is a villainous crime more than the abduction of Japanese nationals in North Korea.
In the Constitution of Japan, judges are not bound by any constitution.
it is imposed on the Constitution of Japan the obligation to observe the Constitution and the law.
In other words, the judgment that violates the law is a crime.
Even this, can you not understand, or are you not having justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom, democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2 (a crime that promoted illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law" against Article 70
of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Please contact us if you have any questions.