<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-01-31: "Crime against humanitarian"
in the case of "violation of immigration law" I am appealing is
(e) remarkable deprivation of detention or other physical freedom
which violates the basic rules of international law. is
Dear sirs. The prosecutor illegally abused the authority it has about July 24, 2010.
I can not guess the crime.
Prosecutors abused their authority despite I am not committing criminal acts.
"The prosecutor who wants to earn" achievement "planned to make the Chinese
who illegally worked" not "fine" but "real punishment".
Prosecutors planned not to violate international law.
Prosecutors disguised me as an alternative supporter without punishing employers
who are supporters of "illegal labor"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins that promote illegal labor".
The prosecutor said that it is a crime that I handed over the "false employment contract"
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act to the Chinese.
However, violation of Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act is cancellation
of status of residence.
Therefore, support for breach of Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act can not be punished.
Prosecutors "utilized" that "people do not know the law".
Prosecutors therefore planned to punish them under Article 60, Article 62 of the Penal Code.
The prosecutor gave me the "arrest / confinement" to the Ogikubo police station
by "the crime of support (Article 60 of the Criminal Law,
Article 62 of the Criminal Law)" against illegal employment
by the Immigration Act 70 (illegal employment
by activities outside the status of qualification) ",
the Tokyo District Court "False complaint" (indictment) was made.
Therefore, the acts of the prosecutors fall
under the Criminal Code Article 172 "Crime of false complaint".
The prosecutor pointed out the crime for the support of Article 22-4-4 of the immigration law,
and the offense is a crime of support of article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Prosecutors are making a fool of law at all.
It is a crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan.
The prosecution still ignores it.
It is a villainous crime more than the abduction of Japanese nationals in North Korea.
In the Constitution of Japan, judges are not constrained by anyone in the Constitution.
However, judges are obliged to observe the Constitution
and the law according to the constitution of the Japanese Constitution.
In other words, the judgment that violates the law is a crime.
Even this, can you not understand, or are you having no justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue with next week.
I will continue until you understand.
God will always support 'justice'.
I certainly believe that justice is "wins".
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners,
but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Please contact us if you have any questions.