<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-02-18: I am sending the same e-mail to Nippon Keidanren and Toyota's labor union.
They ignore the "rule of law".
Do not you have any doubt about buying a "Toyota car"?
Companies' cars ignoring the law will ignore the law.
Do not you think it is dangerous?
Dear sirs. We point out "contract of employment" as the reason
why we supported Chinese "illegal labor".
However, this "contract of employment" is not stipulated by law,
but the section chief of the Ministry of Justice "requested" by "official notice".
The prosecutor says the content of this "contract of employment" is a falsehood.
The judge said that we could "get" the status
of residence (in Japan) "easily" because we "provided" the Chinese with a "contract
of employment of falsehood" content .
And the judge said the Chinese were able to live in Japan,
as "status of residence" was obtained.
that's wrong. The Chinese was able to live in Japan because "entry visa" was obtained
from the foreign minister.
The judge does not know the mechanism of "entry visa".
And the judge said, "Because the Chinese were able to live in Japan,"
illegal labor "was made.
So the judge will link the Chinese immigration law Article 70 "illegal labor other than status
of residence" with the acquisition of status of residence
by submitting the immigration law Article 24-4 "document of falsehood."
It is said that it is "aiding and abetting" of Article 70 of Immigration Control Act.
It is a crazy 'logic of law'.
So we apply Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code "Crime to support other crimes"
against the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act of the Chinese.
the "argument" of such distant "causal relationship" is called "any event can bring bring about
an effect in an unexpected way" theory.
(Kazega hukeba Okeyaga moukaru).
In other words, "causality" is "distortion" of the meaning ".
However, this judge does not understand Immigration Control Act.
Article 24-4 of the Immigration Control Act "Acquisition of" status
of residence "by submitting false documents is not a crime.
The disposition only rescinds "status of residence" granted by Minister of Justice.
It is not "criminal disposition".
Therefore, Article 60 of the Penal Code and Article 62
of the Penal Code can not be applied to "support"
under Article 24-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, the Immigration Control Act was amended on July 1, 2010.
When a foreigner did "support" under Article 24-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
"status of residence" of "that foreigner" was "canceled"
and became "administrative punishment" of "moving out of the country" .
What was stated in the indictment has already been prescribed by the Immigration Control Act.
I was arrested in June 2010. It was July 2010 that the prosecution was charged.
So, police officials, prosecutors and judges had known this amendment sufficiently.
So it is a vicious crime.
In Japan, the practice of applying "crime of support"
under Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code with "distant causal relation" is rooted.
It is a horrible Japanese society that ignored the logic of international law.
With this, anyone can be a criminal.
Such an insane "trial" is done today as well.
Please "relieve" the victim as soon as possible.
This mail is also sending the same mail to the "Prime Minister's Official Residence" in Japan,
"LDP" and "Politicians".
They still do not have "justice" to rule Japan under the law.
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
God will always support 'justice'.
I certainly believe that justice is "wins".
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners,
but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Please contact us if you have any questions.