<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-03-18: (CFO) Mr. Mongoliao (Mr. Mongwang) of "Huawei" is not the only Chinese.
The Chinese government should help poor Chinese who worked in Japan.
Chinese media should report the illegal arrest and trial of the Japanese government!
Communism belongs to the people!
Dear sirs. For foreigners staying in Japan,
occupation is restricted for each status of residence except
for qualifications such as "permanent residence" or "spouse of Japanese."
If you earn income for activities other than those stipulated
for "status of residence" you will be punished under Article 70
of the Immigration Act as "illegal work".
Of course, foreigners whose period of stay is over are "illegal stay" so it is "illegal work".
"Illegal labor" is "established" by "foreigners not eligible to work"
and "employers hiring foreigners who are not eligible to work".
That is why "business entities" are punished under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Act as "a crime that promotes illegal employment".
Under the Immigration Control Law, both foreigners who "work illegally"
and businesses (employers) who illegally employed foreigners are punished.
Let's first know the immigration law of the relationship
1. If foreigners who are not qualified to work work illegally to earn money,
they will be "punished" by "crime of illegal labor".
The legal basis is "work outside the status of qualification"
in Article 70-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
Article 70 Any person who falls under any of the following items shall be "imprisonment"
or "imprisonment" of 3 years or less or "fine" of 3 million yen or less.
Or "compulsory" of "imprisonment with work" or "imprisonment without work" and "fine".
(I) A person who entered Japan in violation of Article 3
(Ii) A person who has landed in Japan without receiving permission
from the immigration inspector for landing
(Iii) Those who have been rescinded of their status of residence and remain
in Japan pursuant to the provisions of Article 22-4,
Paragraph 1 (limited to those pertaining to item 1 or item 2)
A person who has been designated a period pursuant to the provisions of Article 22-4,
Paragraph 7 (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-2-8,
Paragraph 2) What remains
(Iv) Persons who are clearly authorized to exclusively engage in activities that operate revenue
or receive compensation, in violation of Article 19, paragraph 1.
It will continue to next week.
I will continue until you understand.
Please "condemn" the crazy 'logic of law' of Japanese judiciary, everyone in the world.
Everyone, please take up this problem at "G20" or "UN Human Rights Council".
This mail is also sending the same mail to the "Prime Minister's Official Residence" in Japan,
"LDP" and "Politicians". They still do not have "justice" to rule Japan under the law.
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom, democracy and human rights are protected.
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law" against Article 70
of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. It is "crazy" that the prosecution "applies" criminal law Article 62 "crime to support other crimes"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
for reasons of support under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of law is out of order.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
However, there is no causal relation with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
At all, the logic of law is out of order.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Please contact us if you have any questions.