To President Trump
2019-04-30:Dear Sirs, when Mrs. Carroll wrote a letter to French President Macron,
he replied, "I will do everything I can for the former President of Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France should insist on international treaties.
The judicial independence and sovereignty of each country should be protected
under the ratified treaty.
Part 1. It is yesterday's continuation.
I was punished for supporting a Chinese who violated Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
There is no punishment under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
It only cancels the granted status of residence.
The "International Human Rights Code B" prohibits arrest, confinement
and punishment in violation of basic laws.
If this is only me or Chinese, it will not be an international issue.
Because this "error of applicable law" and punishing foreigners "arbitrarily" are routinely done,
it causes many foreign victims.
So I appeal to "everyone."
The Chinese government does not pursue the Japanese government
because the Chinese government violates human rights.
The Philippine government can not protest the Japanese government
because it does not have human resources who understand international law and human rights.
The US government does not protest against customers who buy weapons (Japan).
France, the world's human rights police officer, should protest Japan.
The “hostage justice” in Japan's prosecutors is human rights abuses.
I was not granted "Bail" even after the trial decision.
I was imprisoned for over a year.
Those who claim innocence do not "release".
The prosecutor's office does not "release" until his body weakens, lies and admits sin.
Those who claim innocence do not give "probation of execution" to prison sentences.
(In principle, a prison sentence of up to three years
on first offense is "probation of execution").
Even in prisons, they do not give "parole" if they do not admit crimes.
(Principle: If the punishment ends two thirds, it is a "parole").
The future of Carlos Ghoon's suspect is the same fate as me.
The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Covenant B has also been ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified by the "International Covenant
on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro
My information ***************************************************
Zip code
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
