To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-05-06:Dear Sirs, President Donald Trump says "Government under the law".
It's great. However, the issue of "illegal immigration" is not "sin" of "illegal immigrants" alone.
The government should "punish" "employers" who employ "illegal immigrants" by law.
Unless there are those who employ "illegal immigrants,"
"illegal immigrants" have no meaning to enter the United States.
If so, the United States does not need the Mexican wall.
Part 1. I am Japanese. I am more familiar with "immigration issues" than anyone else.
Because the Japanese government is doing the same thing.
Japan is almost impossible to enter illegally like the United States.
What I am concerned with is a punishment for foreigners who have a legal "stay visa"
but have worked outside the "qualification of residence".
Please see "Part 1 of 2" below.
When I pointed out this problem,
the Japanese government did something worse than the US government.
The prosecution made me "offender" by falsely applying the applicable law.
I handed the "employment contract documents" to the Chinese in order to hire the Chinese.
Prosecutors say that this "employment contract document" is "false."
I accept 100% of the prosecutors' claims. (Because it is not a crime).
The "act" that "indictment" points out is an act
that "supports" Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
A Chinese who "violates" Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act will
only "cancel" the "status of residence".
Since "status of residence" is canceled, it will be "deported abroad".
"Chinese" got "status of residence status" by graduating from Japanese university.
However, there was a Lehman shock in 2008.
I stopped hiring Chinese.
The Chinese were arrested because they were working at a "restaurant"
who was working in "student days".
It is a violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
It is "labor other than status of residence".
The "employers" who employed them knew that they could not "employ".
However, the "employer" who hired them is not arrested
for violation of Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
This problem is the same in the United States.
American employers are innocent, they say, "I thought they had the qualification to work".
In Japan, employers are acquitted if they apologize for saying "I'm sorry".
However, it is guilty if a foreigner apologizes for saying "I'm sorry".
Moreover, they are foreigners with "status of residence", unlike American "illegal immigrants".
Everyone, please do not be with American "illegal immigrants".
So, I "appeal" that this correspondence violates "international law".
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation abroad"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum
and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
