To President Trump
At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "j udicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-05-31:Dear Sirs, "Nature" in the UK accuses the Japanese government
that it can not be scientifically said that "remains" of "Megumi Yokota" is a "fake".
North Korea is "presumption of innocence".
Japan began to move the United Nations and President Donald Trump with the "force" of money.
China and Japan are "crazy".
Part 1. It is a "judgment letter" of "aid / case"
of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Also, the "judicial decision" is written in Japanese to accurately state.
Everyone, please translate correctly.
What I am in dispute is that the reason for the "prosecution" is not a crime.
The criminal reason of the indictment points out Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
The indictment states the same for the four Chinese A, B, C, and D, respectively.
1) Chinese A is working at Restaurant X and reports the "facts"
that violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The "fact" that Nagano created "false documents"
(contract documents with false content) in the "LEFCO company".
3) The fact that "Kin Gungaku", which is regarded as "Complicity",
has passed a "fake document" to Chinese A.
4) "Fact" that Chinese A "attached" false documents ",
went to Tokyo Immigration, and updated" status of residence ".
If it is "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D are violation of Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
However, there are no "facts" that Chinese A, B, C, and D received "disposition"
as a violation of the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) by the Minister of Justice.
Even if it is a "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D do not violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of "status
of residence" received from the Minister of Justice.
The “causal relationship” in which the Chinese A, B, C, D violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act is the “employer”
who hired a non-qualified foreigner prescribed
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Immigration issues are international issues.
Japan accepts foreigners in the name of "technical intern".
They escape from the training site for reasons such as illegal low wages.
"Technical intern" can work only at "the training destination".
Japan's judicial administration punishes foreigners who work illegally
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"Technical intern" is forced to work like "slave".
I also report to "OHCHR".
Ambassadors of African countries say.
"OHCHR" is for Africa. !
Japan is an economical big sponsor of "OHCHR".
"OHCHR" does not say to Japan.
Next week, I will write about foreign victims who violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!