Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-06-17:Dear Sirs,In this "case", police officers, Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis o


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-17:Dear Sirs,In this "case", police officers,
prosecutors and judges do not know the relationship between "status of residence" and "Visa".
Please understand what procedure the Japanese government "issuing" "Visa".
"Status of residence" and "visa" are different.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1. It is the actual practice affairs of obtaining status of residence (Visa) of working.
Foreigners are regulated by the Ministry of Justice in accordance
with the type of status of residence.
It has "standard" of "grant" such as "degree" necessary for qualification "is set".
Foreigners enter Japan after receiving a "Visa" according to the following procedure.

As an example, the case of "inviting" the "Chinese" of "resident in China"
with the status of residence such as "technology" is described.
Chinese send "status of residence" application form, resume, transcripts,
diploma (original), certificate photo etc to "inviting company".
The company that invites them submits it to the Immigration Control
with the employment contract, employment reason statement, company's registered copy,
financial statement, company information, etc.

After one or two weeks,
the immigration office will ask you to submit "Additional Materials" such as "Question calls"
and "cost accounting" details, "Person's plans" and "Customers' orders".
This is the "fact investigation".

In the case of "invite", we did not come to the company and investigate. But,
If you apply for a change of status of residence from "spouse visa" to "permanent visa",
there is a "fact investigation" because "spoofed marriage" is suspected.
The Immigration Official enters the apartment room.
And toothbrushes, pajamas, ...
and the end seems to check up to the "presence" of "semen"
of the sheet to check the "presence" of sex.
(The immigration inspector has been given "right to investigate facts",
so no court permission is required.)

Most Chinese club hostess are international students or "spoofed marriages".
They are relieved about "regular customer",
so anything honestly talks about the "actual situation".

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.


Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp