To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-07-05:Dear Sirs, "Xi Jinping Jintao" defends "Meng Wanzhou CFO" of Fawei
from the United States and the Government of Canada.
However, he does not protect the "poor Chinese"
who have received illegal "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
Chinese should "learn" Hong Kong people. Chinese should "provide protests" to the government.
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
"Improper support of the Immigration Control Act" incident I received in 2010.
"Immigration Act violation (non-qualification activity) case"
Company L made a "provisional contract" for "joining" with
four Chinese who are planning to graduate in March 2009 in the fall of 2008.
As of April 1, 2009, the "employment contract" was "signed" and "granted".
In order to change “Certificate of residence” from “Study Abroad” to “Technology,
Humanities, International Business”,
“4 Chinese” attached the required documents and applied
for “Change of Status of Residence” to Tokyo Immigration.
The examination of "application for change of status of residence" passed.
A postcard saying "Granting a new status of residence" was received from the immigration.
After graduating in March, four Chinese went to Tokyo Immigration with a diploma
and received a "Visa" stamp on their passport in exchange for a postcard.
Company L did not recruit Chinese
who are scheduled to graduate because the work scheduled
to receive orders has been sharply reduced due to the “Lehman Shock”
that occurred in the fall of 2008.
So, four Chinese were illegally working outside the qualification at a tavern etc.
who worked as part-time job as foreign students in order to wait for the recovery
of Japan's economy.
So they were arrested by the Metropolitan Police Department in May 2010
for "unqualified activities" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
It should be noted that none of the "responsible employees" of the restaurant
where four Chinese were working have been arrested.
It will continue next week.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.