To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
Opinion from Japanese
2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".
The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application
of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.
Please see "PDF of Indictment Letter".
The fact that “Chinese people” violated Article 70 paragraph 1 item 4 of the Immigration Act.
The fact that "Chinese people" submitted Article 22-4- (4)
of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents".
The fact that "I and Kingungakuga" "granted" false documents "to" Chinese "is described.
This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law.
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
Please see "letter of indictment" at the following site.
In this case, it is possible to understand "error of applicable law" only by "indictment letter of indictment".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
Part 1. An incident that assisted the Immigration Control Act violation
In May 2010, a "Chinese" was arrested
for violating the Immigration Act 70-1- (4) "extra-qualification activity."
In May 2010, Company L received a "home investigation" on suspicion
of "helping" Article 70-1- (4) of the Immigration Control Act "non-qualified activity".
I was arrested on June 14, 2010.
The reason is that “we issued” “Chinese people”
with “Contents lie fake Employment contract documents” described in Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is Article 62 of the Penal Code "Sin to Support Other Crimes"
for the violation of Article 70-1- (4) "Actual Status of Residence" for "Chinese".
Do you understand? The "Applying Law" is "changing".
I. Acts prescribed by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sin to promote unlawful employment",
which is "a crime of assistance" against "unlawful employment"
of Article 70, paragraph 1 and Article 19, paragraph 1 of the Immigration Act I did not.
The police officer said, "You should admit the crime in the" general theory ".
And the police "sent" me to the "Tokyo District Public Prosecution."
I said to the prosecutor that the act of "supporting"
under the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4), which is the "reason for crime"
of "Indictment Letter", is "not a crime".
The prosecutor said "everyone does not" credit "your" telling ".
"The lawyer" asked the prosecutor to release me.
The prosecutor "rejected" the "request" because "the trial can not be maintained".
And the prosecutor "indicted" me.
Japan is the only country that makes people criminal in the "general theory".
However, the Constitution of Japan stipulates in Article 31 that punishment can only be punished by the law enacted in the Diet.
The "reason for prosecution" and the "decision reason" were
that I issued "documents of employment contract" whose "content is false" to the Chinese,
so the Chinese were able to easily obtain "qualification of residence",
So they were able to "stay" in Japan.
Because they were able to stay in Japan, they said that they were able to "illegal working."
However, if a foreigner submits a "contract document
for employment with false content" and "acquires status of residence",
it is "cancellation of status of residence" in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act. .
The “employment contract document whose content is false” is written as “falsehood documents”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
"Falsehood documents" has been changed to "documents with misrepresented" in subsequent changes.
All four Chinese have not received "cancellation of status of residence"
and "administrative disposition" of "deportation" from the Minister of Justice
for having submitted "false documents".
Even if it receives it, it is an "administrative disposition" of "deportation".
Therefore, he asserted that Article 60
of the Criminal Code "Sin to support other crimes" is not applicable.
The prosecution still "does not admit" the violation of the applicable law.
We need the support of the international community.
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.