To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-07-17:Dear Sirs, There are many Chinese victims.
I contacted the Chinese government many times with letters.
The Chinese government still does not understand the "disposal" that violated the law.
The evidence of this crime can be proved by "Japanese law" and "bill of indictment".
Chinese who can understand the law should understand this "bill of indictment" error.
And "request" the Chinese government to rescue "Chinese victims",
please. Justice is important in the Confucian teachings of Chinese culture.
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment", you can understand "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
● Japanese original text “Prosecution letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
Part 1. Supplement.
Article 24-4 of the Immigration Act is an administrative action by the Minister of Justice.
(Cancellation of status of residence) and (forced withdrawal).
Article 60 of the Penal Code can not be applied to Article 24-4 of the Immigration Act.
The reason is not Article 64 of the Penal Code, and it is impossible to punish those without punishment.
Furthermore, if you obtain a status of residence with false documents
and work within the scope of status of residence, the following will not apply.
It is Article 70 Clause 1 4 and 19 Clause 1 Clause 1 of the Immigration Act.
Therefore, to "help" the "Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act" pointed out as the reason
for the crime is not a causal relationship with the "Article 70 Clause 1 No. 4 and Article 19 Clause 1" .
"The crime of support" of Article 70 Clause 1 4 and Article 19 Clause 1 1 of the Immigration Act is prescribed
by Article 73-2 "Sins promoting illegal work" of Immigration Act.
The “Causality” that they have become “a violation of Article 70 Clause 1 4
and 19 Clause 1 No. 1 of the Immigration Control Act” is stipulated in Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act.
That is because there were "supporters" for "illegal labor".
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.