To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-07-19:Dear Sirs, There are many Korean victims.
I contacted the Korean government many times with letters.
The Korean government still does not understand the "disposal" in violation of the law.
The evidence of this crime can be proved by "Japanese law"
and "bill of indictment".
Koreans who can understand the law should understand this "bill of indictment" error.
And "request" the Korean government to rescue "Korean victims", please.
“Comfort women” and “war time laborers” are resolved by the “Japan-Korea Treaty”.
However, the “immigrants' victims” are unresolved. Current victims should also be 'rescue'.
You can check the latest full text
of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment", you can understand "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
● Japanese original text “Prosecution letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
Part 1. This case does not "fight" the "relation of facts" such as evidence.
For “prosecutors” and other “facts of crime”,
“bill of indictment” and “law” are enough.
In Japan, everyone is deprived of "life and freedom" only
by the law established in the Diet, and "punished" (Article 31 of the Constitution).
I have not violated Japanese law.
Look at "bill of indictment".
Look at "reasons for crime" in the "bill of indictment".
For the Immigration Act Article 70 "illegal work (non-qualification activities)",
It does not mention "facts of crime" under "Criminal Code Article 62 (crime of aiding)".
"The Sin of Support of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" is not "Article 62
of the Penal Code (crime of aiding)."
As "special law", it is regulated
by Immigration Act 73-2 Article "Sin to promote illegal work".
“The reason for the crime” is the fact described
in Article 22-4- (4) “Revocation of Status of Residence” under the Immigration Act.
This is a "copy" of the provisions of Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act ("Foreigners who obtain a status of residence
with a false document will cancel their status of residence").
"Prosecutors" have "the provision" as "the fact of crime of support crime"
of the Immigration Act Article 70 "illegal work (non-qualified activity)".
It's a "lie" "complaint".
The Chinese have not been "canceled of the status of residence"
for the reason that they have submitted "a lie document"
from the Minister of Justice and obtained "qualification of residence".
We have not received the "measures"
under Article 22-4- (4) "Revocation of Status of Residence" under the Immigration Act.
※ As a result, it will be "deport from the country",
but this is because it received "the punishment of labor" in Article 70 of the Immigration Act "illegal work (non-qualification activity)".
(We have not received “cancellation of status of residence”
and “deportation” for reasons of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) described
in “reason for crime” in the indictment.)
It will continue next week.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Act on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.