To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-07-25: Dear Sirs, if the Japanese government admits "error in applicable law",
it can be said that Japan is "ruled under the law".
The Japanese government has not yet recognized crimes.
Japan says "Korean government's treaty violation",
but the Japanese government does not observe the ratified "international law".
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment",
you can understand "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
Part 1. I am not doing any criminal activity.
I will not be guilty
at all as a "reason" to "support" Article 70 "Acts outside the qualification"
under the Immigration Act.
However, prosecutors and judges say the following "logic".
The Chinese is the reason for the Immigration Control Act Article 22-4- (4) "Cancellation
of the status of residence" (a false document has been submitted
to obtain status of residence).
I "issued" this "false document" to the Chinese.
Because it is considered as "a sin of support"
of the Article 70 "Acts outside qualification" of the Immigration Act "arbitrarily"
for this reason, I am innocent of anything.
("Subject .." is "replaced" on the way).
The "judgment document" and "bill of indictment" "indicate" the following as "reasons for crime".
I provided the "fake false documents" to the Chinese.
I "support" the violation of Article 22-4- (4) "cancellation of the status
of residence" of the Immigration Control Act of "Chinese".
"Surprised." The court's view on "causal relationship" is as follows.
The "Chinese" in violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act was permitted to "stay" under the status of "Study Abroad".
In other words, it became possible to continue to "stay"
by changing "qualification of residence" and acquiring "qualification of residence" anew.
It is clear that it was "impossible" to carry out "non-qualified activities"
in Japan if they can not "stay".
The "defendant" has "delivered" "documents of a false employment contract
whose content is false" to the Chinese.
So it made it easy for the Chinese to get permission to change the status of residence.
It is "obvious" that there is a "causal relationship" between "the accused's act"
and "the non-qualified activity" of the "Chinese."
(The above "judgment document" about the second "causality").
I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation abroad"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.