To President Trump
2019-08-13:Dear Sirs, please support me in order for Japan to rule under freedom, democracy and law.
"ICC" is not "only" for human rights crimes in underdeveloped countries such as African countries.
Human rights crimes in developed countries should be "trialed". Please move the UN.
Part 1. The reason for the "crime" of the bill of indictment is Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act "Revocation of residence status by filing false documents".
It is not possible to "punish" the "supporter"
who violated Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
If the "supporter" is a foreigner, the law amendment on July 1, 2010 clearly stipulates.
(Administrative disposition).
1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) Deportation abroad.
"Chinese people" and "Filipino people" received "Failed documents"
and received "Certificate of residence". Is not ...
Therefore, the prosecutors can not "punish" us for "support reasons"
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "disposal of cancellation of status of residence".
If the prosecutor's office wants to "punish" us, we should change "reasons for crime".
No reason for crime found.
If "Chinese" violates the Immigration Control Act Article 22-4-4,
it should be notified to the Minister of Justice.
The Minister of Justice will take "administrative sanctions"
in accordance with Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
1. Cancel the "Certificate of residence" of the offending Chinese.
2. We will issue a "deportation" to the offending Chinese.
By the law revision on July 1, 2010, this "supporter" was also the same "disposal."
Therefore, the "prosecution" and "judgment" of prosecutors are "intentional",
and it is Article 172 "False Complaint" of criminal law.
In this case, it is Article 194 "Abuse of Authority by Special public officers"
under criminal law 194 because "Arrest and Confinement" has been done.
It is not necessary to "provide proof" for "crime composition requirements"
of Article 194 of the criminal code.
It is established by the fact that I was arrested and imprisoned in office.
"Precedent of the Supreme Court".
For the law of criminal law, please refer to the following (Japanese and English).
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1960
The "rule of law" of Japanese police officers and judges is "insane."
They are still ignoring.
Everyone in the world should stand up one day and support me.
The support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act can not be "turned
into a criminal" as "reason for crime",
In violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act,
the "crimesion of support" in Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code is a "conscious" violation of the applicable law.
That is "False charges".
The prosecution does not yet understand this logic.
I think you can understand that Japan's immigration administration is "rotten".
Thank you to everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist
who can explain the logic of this law to the Japanese government.
I will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment",
you can understand "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
For the law of criminal law, please refer to the following (Japanese and English).
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1960
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
