To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2019-08-19:Dear Sir,
I'm amazed by the incompetence of the Japanese "Diet member"
They don't understand Article 31 of the Constitution. "Diet member" makes the law.
"Diet member" should have "responsibility" for "law".
This is the right and obligation of "Diet member".
"Diet member" seems to be only "politicians" who insist only on their rights.
Part 1. “Crime of aiding and abetting” for “illegal labor”
by Article 70 “Unqualified Activities” in violation
of the Immigration Act is Article 73-2 “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.
Article 73-2 (1) A person falling under any of the following items is to be punished
with imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine not exceeding 3 million yen,
or is to be subject to the cumulative imposition of imprisonment and a fine:
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
The landscaping company and the person responsible for hiring foreigners
who are not eligible to work are subject to disposal.
The punishment for three people is unfair.
In this case, the “landscaping companies and managers”
who employed them are not “punished” under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
so they are “innocent” by “equality under the law” and “international law”.
And "support" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be used as "reason
for crime" and "supporter" cannot be "criminal"
It is (Revocation of Status of Residence).
Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to a Foreign National residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as Refugees as set forth in Article 61-2, paragraph (1)),
the Minister of Justice may revoke the Foreign National's status of residence
in accordance with the procedures provided for by Ministry of Justice Order:
(iv) beyond what is provided for in the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the Foreign National has been granted, by submitting
or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including a certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry
or a visa obtained for the Passport by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry), or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing;
Applying the “sin of support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code for violations
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act is a “conscious” “violation of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.
You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
