To President Trump
2019-08-20: Dear Sir,
Korea does not follow the treaty with Japan.
The Japanese government, which was angry about this, excluded Korea from the “White List”.
The relations between Japan and Korea are progressing to “breaking diplomatic relations”.
History is back in 1945.In this era, “UN organizations” are useless.
Part 1. The article doesn't say that "landscaping companies and managers" were "punished".
Perhaps you did not "punish" the offender with "extremely close relationship," as usual.
It is international to "punish" only Philippine people who have done "illegal labor"
without "punishing" "landscaping companies and managers"
who illegally hired "Philippines who are not eligible to work"
in violation of the Immigration Act It is against the law.
Immigration Law Article 73-2 “Sin which promotes illegal employment” is the same logic
as “Prostitution Prevention Law”.
“Illegal labor” is not possible without a person who employs “illegal workers”.
Immigration Law Article 73-2 “Punish to Promote Unlawful Employment” is “from the past”.
However, it was revised in July 2010.
"I don't allow excuses that employers didn't know this law" was implemented.
However, the “employer” is often not “punished”
by the “adhesion relationship” between the “police” and the “employer”.
The support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be "criminal"
as "reason for crime"
Applying the “Sin of Support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is a “breach of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.
You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
