Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-08-21:Dear Sir, If Korea “destroys” “GSOMIA”, the US should destroy the “US-Korea Security Treaty”

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-08-21:Dear Sir,
If Korea “destroys” “GSOMIA”, the US should destroy the “US-Korea Security Treaty”
and withdraw the “US Army” from Korea.
And the US should attack Korea by signing a military treaty with North Korea.
North Korea is “strengthening” the “training”
of missile attacks on South Korea through a “secret agreement” with the United States.


Part 1. But this is a "criminal act". The sin name is “False accusation”.
Philippines who have obtained a false employment contract
and obtained status of residence are subject to the “disposition”
of Article 22-4-4 “Revocation of Status of Residence” in the Immigration Control Act.
“Cancel” of “Resident Status” is as follows.
The Minister of Justice will deliver the “Notification of Cancellation
of Status of Residence” to “in person”.

Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 “Revocation of Status of Residence”.
Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to a Foreign National residing in Japan under a status
of residence listed in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as Refugees as set forth in Article 61-2,
paragraph (1)), the Minister of Justice may revoke the Foreign National's status
of residence in accordance with the procedures provided for by Ministry of Justice Order:
(iv) beyond what is provided for in the cases listed
in the preceding three items, the Foreign National has been granted,
by submitting or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including a certificate pursuant to the provisions
of Article 7-2, paragraph (1), obtained by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry or a visa obtained for the Passport
by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry),
or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing;

The cancellation of the status of residence is an “administrative disposition”
of “forcibly leaving the country”.
Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
and “Sinners Supporting Other Crimes” cannot be applied to “Administrative Disposition”
of “Forcibly Deporting Outside of Japan”.

Therefore, in order to obtain the status of residence in July 2010,
those who made false documents etc. to other foreigners and those
who helped were also subject to “forced deportation”
and “cancellation of status of residence” Added.
(Currently, it has been “integrated” in Article 34 “Forcibly Departing Overseas”).

The article does not state that three
of the Filipinos have been subjected to the immigration law Article 22-4-4
“Revocation of Status of Residence”.
Even if the embassy staff or diplomat “delivered” a “false employment contract”
to the Philippines, the embassy staff and diplomat will not be punished.

“Support” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be made “criminal”
with “reason for crime” as the cause.
Applying the “Sin of Support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code for violations
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is a “breach of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist
who can explain the logic of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
“Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku” Please see “Bill of indictment”
at “Web site” below.
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp