Opinion
Sunday edition, 25 August 2019:
Dear Sir, It seems that the “Summit declaration” announced at the “G7 Summit” held
in France on the 24th to 26th is not “adopted”.
But France should lead the implementation of “digital taxation”.
The “power” of “France” is tested.
I can be strong if you "spread" this.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
Part 1. According to news sources such as Jiji Press,
the “Summit declaration” does not appear to be “adopted”.
A Japanese government official revealed on the 20th.
The reason is that there is a large gap between European
and American opinions on free trade and “climate change measures”.
The publication of “result documents” is expected to be made
in each “individual field” such as “Disparity Issues”.
When no “Summit declaration” is issued at the summit.
Each country is “concerned” that it will increase the influence of China and Russia.
In France, the “Digital Taxation Law” was enacted on the 11th to tax the “part of sales”
of online business in “in France”.
For the United States, where many large IT companies are based,
taxation targeting IT companies could reduce their tax revenues.
For this reason, the US repels that this digital taxation is "unfairly targeting US companies."
We began investigating whether taxation is unfair. Depending
on the outcome, sanctions including tariffs may be considered.
“Mr. Lemer” said at the interview after the end of the meeting on the 17th,
“There remains a“ complex discussion ”on how to specifically deal
with the digitized business!” Said.
It seems that “subtle bargaining” over “specific taxation methods” will continue in the future.
I think France is looking at the “digital business industry” calmly.
Currently, US companies are the main target, but within a few years,
Chinese companies will monopolize a large market.
I think that France should be implemented even with the resistance of the United States,
with the advancement of Chinese companies in mind.
Rather than oppose the French policy,
the United States should make rules that prevent the profits
of the “digital business industry” from being monopolized by China
on the premise of the advance of China.
Continue to next week.
Part 2. The Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office is “crushing” the crimes of prosecutors even
in violation of the Immigration Control Act.
There are a lot of foreigners (uncountable).
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!
Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.
They have been arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act
and have been subjected to "criminal dispositions" such as "a prison term sentence"
and "fine sentence". And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.
I wrote about this yesterday.
The prosecution has arrested a third party for charges
of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is "I and" Kin Gungaku who is Chinese ".
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.
The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:
I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
So, as a crime against foreigner's Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor”,
“Sinners supporting other crimes” of “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” apply.
The “Sin of Support” against Article 70 “Illegal Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act is stipulated in “Sin Promoting Unlawful Employment”
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.
Even if you obtain a status of residence with "false documents",
it is not "illegal labor" if you work within the scope of "status of residence".
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in "Applicable Law".
This is a perfect "False charge".
Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation"
If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.
There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.
Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
