To President Trump
2019-09-04: Dear Sir,
Police officers, prosecutors, and judges involved in the case are clearly criminal.
Despite the fact that no crimes can be guessed or “no crime”,
“crime facts” are illegally created and the good people are made criminal.
The crimes are Article 172 “Crimes of False Complaints” of the Penal Code
and 194 “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
The sin is a “felony”.
Article 194 of the Penal Code is “No deliberate proof required”.
Part 1. They conspired to make false “acts”.
So all “criminal facts” of “special civil servants” were revealed.
Until now, foreigners who have violated Article 70-2 of the Immigration Control Act
and do not “punish” their employers
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act will be sent to the “Immigration Facility”
if they do not punish.
And they are “repatriated”.
This is “normal processing”.
Ordinary prosecutors do not "punish" because this is "the logic of law".
It is a false litigation because a legal expert wants to get a handle
and makes a criminal accusation (indictment) in an unreasonable scenario.
In practice, it is an illegal arrest warrant,
so it imposes freedom of decision-making and is arrested and confined.
Article 172 A person who submits a false complaint,
accusation or other denunciation for the purpose of having a punishment
or disciplinary action imposed upon another shall be punished
by not less than 3 months but not more than 10 years.
(Abuse of Authority by Special public officers)
Article 194 When a person performing or assisting
in judicial, prosecutorial or police duties, abuses his or her authority
and unlawfully captures or confines another, imprisonment
or imprisonment without work for not less than 6 months
but not more than 10 years shall be imposed.
This is the “summary” of “crime facts” in this “letter of complaint.”
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status
of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62
of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!