To President Trump
2019-09-06: Dear Sir,
I will “publish” the name “Nagano Yasuhiro”! The address is open to "Mihama-ku, Chiba City"! Next,
they will “target” my “life”. Protect me, everyone in the world!
I will do my best until it becomes a country where Japan is governed under the law.
Part 1. Prosecutors should not break any further, “criminal statutoryism”!
Don't drop "any further", Japan's "international status"!
Foreigners who have worked illegally will be “punished”
for “guilty of labor other than status of residence”
in Article 70, Paragraph 1, Item 4 and Article 19, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Immigration Control Act.
And the Immigration Law has a legal system in which employers are equally “punished”
by “equality under the law” and “not violate international law”.
The crimes of employers are stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 73-2 “Sins that promoted illegal employment”.
If you do not “punish” your employer, you should not “punish” “illegally worked Filipinos”.
It is "Arbitrary" that "punishes" only foreigners.
This violates international law.
Therefore, the Philippine people receive no “punishment”.
In this immigration violation case, the cause and effect of illegal labor is crazy.
1) They were able to obtain “status of residence” “easy”
by submitting “documents of false employment contracts”.
2) So they were able to live in Japan.
Due to these causal relationships, embassy staff (drivers) are considered “supporters” for illegal labor.
Again, this “law logic” is illegal in two ways:
1. The reason for the crime is “support” in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
Violators of the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) only receive “administrative disposition”
from the Minister of Justice.
“Punishment” is not possible.
Therefore, it is illegal to apply Article 60 of the Criminal Code
and Article 62 of the Criminal Code "Sinners to Support Other Crimes".
2. Even if you obtain “status of residence” with false documents,
it is not a violation of the Immigration Act Article 70 if you work within the scope of “status of residence”.
Japanese judicial level is too low, so “pointing out” and “guidance”
from the international community are necessary.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!