To President Trump
2019-09-09: Dear Sir,
The Chinese government should ask the Japanese government to restore the honor of the people
and “compensation”. A violation of the immigration law of the Japanese government.
In 2010, the Chinese and I are the victims.
Judges must be punished by the constitution and the law according to the provisions
of the constitution. Japan has ratified human rights treaties.
Part 1. Philippines were punished by the Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor”.
The officials of the Philippine embassy were punished
for “supporting” Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
Philippine Embassy staff (driver),
Philippine diplomat and 2 Philippine Embassy staff
(hereinafter referred to as Crime of assistance).
The “reason for crime” in “bill of indictment” is support
for the “cancellation of visa status” in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Violation of Immigration Law 22-4- (4) is not a "criminal penalty"
“Sin of support” against Article 70 of the Immigration Act is stipulated
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
It is a “false charge” to apply Article 60
and 62 “Sinners to Support Other Crimes” to the Immigration Law Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”
under the “Logic of Law”.
Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) and Immigration Act Article 70 are completely unrelated.
Suppose that “visa status” is obtained by submitting “false documents”
that are the reason for “cancellation of visa status”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
However, if they work within the “visa status” range,
they will not become Article 70 “Illegal Labor outside the qualifications”.
The causal relationship in which they violated the “Immigration Law
Article 70” was because there were employers who hired them.
Therefore, it is stipulated that employers are “punished”
in Article 73-2 “Crime for Supporting Illegal Labor”.
Therefore, the officials of the Embassy of the Philippines cannot "guess" any crime.
The punishment is "false charge" because it is not criminal.
For more information, see the accused's complaint, May 25, 2015, Non-accused,
police officer, prosecutor.
“Three Filipinos” who have engaged in illegal work are “innocent”
because the employers who employed them have not been “punished”
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act “Since to promote illegal employment” .
This is the “Regulation of International Law”.
“Three people” had a visa status of “passport for specific activities”
and “residence status card”.
"Don't confirm" is not a "good reason".
In all cases, “Do not apply” to the employer Article 73-2 “Improving Unlawful Employment”
of Immigration Law is the root of all evil.
The reason is “darkness”.
The Chinese government should insist on the Japanese government's violation
of international law and demand the restoration and compensation of the honor of the “Chinese”.
I sent the materials to the Chinese Embassy and explained them.
At that time, the staff of the Chinese Embassy told me.
“The Chinese government says nothing to the Japanese government.”
It must have fallen into the Japanese government's honey trap.
If this is Hong Kong, I will definitely not forgive it.
The Communist government should act before the Chinese “speak out” throughout China.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it
by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!