2019-09-16: Dear Sir,
The darkness of the “Immigration Violation Case” is serious.
Immigration law is revised every year.
Parliamentarians know the “purpose” of the Immigration Act and amendments most.
But in reality, legislators don't understand.
In addition, lawyers do not understand immigration law.
Probably there are only a few lawyers in Japan who understand immigration law.
This leads to illegal “indictment” and illegal “trial”.
This is the “actual situation” of “Japanese judicial system”.
Please help everyone.
Part 1. Describes the false name of the sin.
The following scenario is the “causal relationship”
for “Assistance crime” in Article 70 “Unqualified Activities”
of the Immigration Control Act.
1) The Philippine people received a "false employment contract" "provided"
from the Philippine Embassy staff.
This means that we have received support from Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law.
2) Therefore, the Philippine people were able to obtain “Resident Status”
by submitting their “employment contract” to immigration.
They are saying that they committed the violation of Immigration 22-4- (4).
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to violate the Immigration Act Article 70.
This is not a causal offense of the Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor Sin”.
This is the causal relationship between the act
of violating the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submitting false documents
and obtaining status of residence” and the support act.
The violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act will be handled as follows
by the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) Forced removal from overseas.
With the 2010 revision, “supporters” have become “same treatment”.
Say it for reference.
Even if you submit a false document and obtain "Residence Status",
it does not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
if you work within the "Resident Status".
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are therefore completely innocent.
The causal relationship that caused the Philippine people to violate Article 70
of the Immigration Law was because there were employers who hired them.
So the Immigration Act punishes employers in Article 73-2.
But the prosecution is acquitting the employer.
Also, it is illegal "not equal under the law" to punish
only Filipinos without punishing the employer who is the main cause of unlawful labor.
It also violates international law because it punishes only Filipinos “intentionally”.
That's why Philippines who worked illegally are also innocent.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.