To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2019-09-17: Dear Sir,
The darkness of Japan is that lawyers do not examine the law.
We ask lawyers to deliver “immigration law”
because “Arrest is a violation of applicable law”.
I received the "Ministerial Ordinance" of the Ministry of Justice,
not the "Immigration Law". When I tell the lawyer Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Law,
he says, “There is no point in saying“ procedure theory ”.
They “pretend to know” the law.
Part 1. “Filipinos” who did “unqualified labor” were punished
by the Immigration Act Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
However, employers are not punished by Immigration Act Article 73-2.
However, the prosecutor took a bold illegal act.
The prosecution punished a third party who “provided” the Philippines
with “documents of false employment contracts”.
The third party is the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomat.
“Sin name” is “Sin for supporting other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
The reason for the crime of “bill of indictment” is the reason
for “supporting” immigration law 22-4- (4).
Foreigners who support Immigration Law 22-4- (4) are subject to administrative sanctions
by the Minister of Justice.
With administrative disposal
1) “Cancellation of status of residence”.
2) “Forcibly leaving the country”.
Since "reason for crime" is support of Immigration Law 22-4- (4),
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied.
Immigration Act 24-4- (4) "Activity to support" the act
of "Cancellation of Status of Residence" is not related to Immigration Act Article 70.
The application of Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code requested
by the prosecutor is an illegal act with Crime name being false.
None of the “three Filipinos” have even been “disposed of deportation”
by the Minister of Justice for reasons of “Revocation of Status of Residence”
in Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
The purpose of immigration law, equality under the law,
and in order not to violate international law are as follows.
Employers who hired Philippine people illegally are not “criminally punished”
by immigration law.
That's why Filipinos who worked illegally must say "do not punish".
Arrest and confinement, where only the Filipinos are illegally arrested
and pressure the freedom of decision-making by illegal means,
is a criminal act of “malignant” and “intentional” rather than “mere fault”.
“Crime name” is the article 194 “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only,
but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
