To President Trump
2019-09-20: Dear Sir,
My trial materials will be given to the prison.
Multiple prison officers notice my "applicable law" "error"
by looking at my trial records. I am innocent.
What a prison officer can do is "get me released" as soon as possible.
“Judge of the original referee” who is afraid of my “parole” will not allow “parole”.
The prison officer told me "Don't forget this".
I will make Japan a “country governed under the law”.
Part 1. The police and prosecutors "abuse" this because the general public
and Filipinos are not familiar with the law.
The police and prosecutors applied the following persons as substitutes
for “Helper” in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Police and public prosecutors have designated "Helper"
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 as "Helper" in the Immigration Act Article 70.
In the case of the Embassy of the Philippines,
it was disposed of in a causal relationship completely different
from the purpose of the immigration law for “illegal labor”.
Three Filipinos were disposed of under Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Work Crimes”.
The “supporter” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act,
which has nothing to do with the Immigration Act Article 70,
has been disposed of as the “supporter” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The reason for the crime was "providing" "false fake documents" to "Philippines
who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act".
But this is not a crime.
The disposal is an “administrative disposal” by the Minister of Justice.
They are “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced deportation”.
The person whom three Filipinos “acquired” a “false fake employment contract”
is a Philippine embassy employee (driver) (later two embassy staff members
and a diplomat will be additionally sent).
They thought that “meritorious deed” would be great because making
both of them criminals would have a great impact on society.
The purpose of the police officer's crime was to abuse the purpose
of “cancellation of status of residence” established in 2004.
This case is four Chinese offenders who were violated the Immigration Act
in 2010 (non-qualified activities) and were accused of Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
And "I and the Chinese Kin Gungaku", which was regarded as a crime
under the support of Article 70 of the Immigration Act
for the reasons of support of the Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
The Philippine Embassy case is exactly the same as the 2010 case.
Victims "spread" because they do not arrest prosecutors and police judges.
The international community should stop Japan's “human rights violations”.
The “human rights treaty” states that punishment that is not based
on the basic laws of each country is a violation.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!