To President Trump
2019-09-26: Dear Sir,
Many people say.
The act of providing a “false document” that violates Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act is not a crime.
However, the Tokyo District Prosecution will not "accept" a letter of complaint.
This “unacceptable” itself is an act of denying “rule of law”.
This “aging statute of limitation” is “stopped”.
Part 1. Police officers and prosecutors made obvious “errors of applicable laws”.
Police officers cannot explain the reason for the crime.
So they say:
"You should accept (accept)" your crime "in" general theory ". "
I think this is only "Japan".
If you have a "counter objection" to this, see "bill of indictment."
"Judgment document" is the same as "bill of indictment."
The prosecutor says:
“If you accept the crime, I ’ll give you a fine. "
"If you do not accept the crime, I will send you to" Prison ". "
I will say this over and over again.
I say the logic of the law.
Then the young prosecutor says:
“No one believes you (the logic of law)!”.
“My lawyer” says it is “procedural theory”.
There is no point in saying "procedure theory".
Is "my logic" "procedure"? Crazy.
The prosecutor says last.
"It's already over. I'm sending you to jail!"
In fact, I was sent to jail.
Even in jail, "If you don't accept the crime, there is no" temporary release "."
I want to be a beautiful Japanese.
I don't want to "deal" with "bad guys".
I will definitely resolve this case.
At that time, for the first time, Japan will become a “country governed under the law”.
It becomes a country that protects international law.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!