To President Trump
2019-10-01: Dear Sir,
Prostitution is “established” because there are “male” who buy “female”.
Japanese prosecutors “think” that “prostitution” can be done
by one woman. Canada makes “male” “guilty”.
And “woman” is acquitted. Japanese justice is crazy.
The international community should guide Japan.
Part 1. Criminal facts of Article 172 "Criticism of False False" committed
by the prosecutor who conducted the investigation.
Around June 2014. Filipinos were working in “non-qualified activities”
at a “landscaping company” in Tokyo.
Prosecutors do not arrest "employees" who hired foreigners illegally
in Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sinners to Promote Unlawful Employment",
and only Filipinos in Immigration Act Article 70 I was arrested.
“The prosecutor who wants to get a meritorious deed” “abused” his “authority”.
They “planned” the illegal work of Filipinos as “working punishment”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Act, unlike the “normal way”.
To do so, employers must be punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
in order not to violate international law.
However, because he did not want to punish the employer for “feeling”,
he arrested the “innocent third party”.
The third party is the “supporter”
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submission of False Documents”.
The reason for the crime is that it supported Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act is not a crime,
so it was named “supporter” of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Prosecutors illegally “disguised” embassy staff (drivers) as “support”
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The Filipinos were provided with a “document of false employment contract”
by the embassy staff (driver).
Then, he obtained “Resident Status” by attaching “Contract Documents for False Employment”.
This is a violation of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.
However, it was forcibly linked to “support” for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic is as follows.
1) The Philippine people received “a contract document of employment with false content”.
2) Philippine people were able to easily obtain “resident status”.
3) Philippines were able to stay in Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
4) Since the Filippins were able to stay in Japan, Article 70 “Illegal Labor” was completed.
afterwards,
The Filipinos were sentenced to "jail sentence"
in Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Act.
They are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired foreigners illegally.
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats were "indicted"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code for reasons of criminal activity supported
by the Immigration Act 22-4-4.
They do not violate Japanese law "even 1mm". They are “false accusation”.
They are “innocent”.
Is the Philippine government still unable to understand?
You should ask foreign governments for “legal support”.
And the Philippine government should demand the "recovery of honor" and "compensation"
of the Philippine people from the Japanese government.
The same applies to the Chinese government.
The Chinese were damaged in 2010.
It will continue tomorrow. The following tasks are ::
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
